Disability studies, the social model and legal developments

International Studies in Human Rights

Volumn 100, Issue , 2009, Pages 3-16

  Traustadóttir, Rannveig ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940660973     PISSN: 09244751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1163/ej.9789004169715.i-320.7     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Barnes, C., Oliver, M. and Barton, L. (eds.) (2002). Disability Studies Today. Cambridge: Polity Press;
2. Barton, L. (ed.) (2001). Disability, Politics and the Struggle for Change. London: David Fulton;
3. Campbell, J. and Oliver, M. (1996). Disability Politics: Understanding Our Past, Changing Our Future. London: Routledge;
4. Hahn, H. (2002). Academic Debates and Political Advocacy: The US Disability Movement. In C. Barnes, M. Oliver, and L. Barton (eds.), Disability Studies Today (pp. 162-189). Cambridge: Polity Press.
5. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, GA Res. 61/106 (2007).
6. Barnes, Oliver, and Barton, supra note 1; Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan;
7. Thomas, C. (1999). Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
8. Gustavsson, A., Tøssebro, J. and Traustadóttir, R. (2005). Introduction: Approaches and Perspectives in Nordic Disability Research. In A. Gustavsson, J. Sandvin, R. Traustadóttir and J. Tøssebro (eds.), Resistance, Reflection and Change: Nordic Disability Research (pp. 23-44). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
9. Albrecht, G. L. (2002). American Pragmatism, Sociology and the Development of Disability Studies. In C. Barnes, M. Oliver and L. Barton, (eds.), Disability Studies Today (pp. 18-37). Cambridge: Polity Press
10. Bank-Mikkelsen, N. E. (1969). A Metropolitan Area in Denmark: Copenhagen. In R. Kugel and W. Wolfensberger (eds.) Changing Patterns in Residential Services for the Mentally Retarded (pp. 227-254). Washington, DC: President's Committee on Mental Retardation;
11. Grünewald, K. (1969). A Rural County in Sweden. In Kugel and Wolfensberger (eds.), ibid., (pp. 255-287);
12. Nirje, B. (1969). The Normalization Principle and Its Human Management Implications. In Krugel and Wolfensberger (eds.), ibid., (pp. 179-195).
13. Wolfensberger, W. (1985). Social Role Valorization: A New Insight, and a New Term for Normalization. Australian Association for the Mentally Retarded Journal, 9(1), 4-10.
14. Davis, L. (ed.) (2006). The Disability Studies Reader (2nd edition). New York: Routledge;
15. Goodley, D. and Van Hove, G. (eds.) (2005). Another Disability Studies Reader? People with Learning Difficulties and a Disabling World. Antwerpen: Garant;
16. Johnstone, D. (2001). An Introduction to Disability Studies (2nd edition). London: David Fulton.
17. Bell, C. (2006). Introducing White Disability Studies: A Modest Proposal. In L. Davis (ed.), The Disability Studies Reader (2nd edition) (pp. 275-282). New York: Routledge;
18. Grue, L. and Heiberg, A. (2006). Notes on the History of Normality: Reflections on the Work of Quetelet and Galton. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 8(4), 232-246;
19. Snyder, S. L., Bruggemann, B., Thomson, R. G. (eds.) (2002). Disability Studies: Enabling the Humanities. New York: Modern Language Association;
20. Mitchell, D. T. and Snyder, S. L. (eds.) (1999). The Body and Physical Difference: Discourses of Disability. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
21. Snyder, Bruggemann and Thomson, ibid.; Davis, supra note 8; Shakespeare, T. (ed.) (1998). The Disability Reader: Social Science Perspectives. London: Cassell;
22. Snyder, S. L. and Mitchell, D. T. (2006). Cultural Locations of Disability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Campbell and Oliver, supra note 1; Longmore, P. L. and Umansky, L. (eds.) (2001). The New Disability History: American Perspectives. New York: New York University Press.
24. Campbell and Oliver, supra note 1; DeJong, G. (1981). The Movement for Independent Living: Origins, Ideology and Implications for Disability Research. In A. Brechin, P. Liddiard and J. Swain (eds.), Handicap in a Social World. Sevenoaks: Hodder and Stoughton, in association with the Open University;
25. William, P. and Shoultz, B. (1982). We Can Speak for Ourselves: Self-Advocacy by Mentally Handicapped People. London: Souvenir Press.
26. Briadotti, R. (2002). The Uses and Abuses of the Sex/Gender Distinction in European Feminist Practices. In G. Griffin and R. Briadotti (eds.), Thinking Differently: A Reader in European Women's studies (pp. 285-307). London: Zed Books;
27. Thomas, supra note 3; Traustadóttir, R. and Kristiansen, K. (eds.) (2004). Gender and Disability Research in the Nordic Countries. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
28. Briadotti, ibid.; Butler, J. (1999). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
29. Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability Rights and Wrongs. London: Routledge; Thomas, supra note 3.
30. Mercer, G. (2002). Emancipatory Disability Research. In C. Barnes, M. Oliver, and L. Barton (eds.), Disability Studies Today (pp. 228-249). Cambridge: Polity Press;
31. Oliver, M. (1992). Changing the Social Relations of Research Production. Disability, Handicap & Society, 7(2), 101-114;
32. Traustadóttir, R. (2001). Research with Others: Reflections on Representation, Difference and Othering. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 3(2), 9-28;
33. Walmsley, J. and Johnson, K. (2003). Inclusive Research with People with Learning Disabilities: Past, Present and Futures. London: Jessica Kingsley.
34. Grue, L. (2004) Funksjonshemmet er bare et ord (Disability is Just a Word). Oslo: Abstract forlag;
35. Gustavsson, A. and Zakrzewska-Manterys, E. (eds.) (1997). Social Definitions of Disability. Warsaw: Zac;
36. Kasnitz, D. and Shuttleworth, R. (2003). A Sociocultural Model of Impairment - Disability. Conference paper. Disability Studies: Theory, Policy and Practice, 4-6 September Lancaster University, UK;
37. Thomas, C. (2007). Sociologies of Disability and Illness: Contested Ideas in Disability Studies and Medical Sociology. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
38. Oliver, M. (2004). The Social Model in Action: If I had a Hammer. In C. Barnes and G. Mercer (eds.), Implementing the Social Model of Disability: Theory and Research (pp. 18-31). Leeds: The Disability Press.
39. Finkelstein, V. (1980). Attitudes and Disabled People: Issues for Discussion. New York: World Rehabilitation Fund;
40. Oliver, M. (1990). The Politics of Disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
41. Barnes, C. (1991). Disabled People in Britain and Discrimination: A Case for Anti-discrimination Legislation. London: Hurst & Co;
42. Barnes, C. and Mercer, G. (2003). Disability. Cambridge: Polity;
43. Barnes, C. and Mercer, G. (2001). The Politics of Disability and the Struggle for Change. In L. Barton (ed.). Disability, Politics and the Struggle for Change (pp. 11-23). London: David Fulton; Barnes and Mercer, supra note 22.
44. Corker, M. and French, S. (eds.) (1999). Disability Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press;
45. Shakespeare, T. and Watson, N. (2001). The Social Model of Disability: An Outdated Ideology? In S. Barnatt and B. M. Altman (eds.), Exploring Theories and Expanding Methodologies: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go. Research in Social Sciences and Disability, (pp. 9-28). London: Elsevier Science.
46. Corbett, J. (1996). Bad Mouthing: The Language of Special Needs. London: Falmer Press;
47. Corker, M. (1998). Deaf and Disabled or Deafness Disabled? Buckingham: Open University Press; Goodley and Van Hove, supra note 8.
48. Shakespeare and Watson, supra note 28; Shakespeare, T. (2004). Social Models of Disability and Other Life Strategies. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 6(1), 8-21.
49. Crow, L. (1996). Including All of Our Lives: Renewing the Social Model of Disability. In J. Morris (ed.) Encounters with Strangers: Feminism and Disability (pp. 206-226). London: The Women's Press.
50. Thomas, C. (2001). Feminism and Disability: The Theoretical and Political Significance of the Personal and the Experiential. In L. Barton (ed.), Disability, Politics and the Struggle for Change (pp. 48-58). London: David Fulton.
51. Thomas, C. (2002). Disability Theory: Key Ideas, Issues and Thinkers. In C. Barnes, M. Oliver, and L. Barton, (eds.), Disability Studies Today (pp. 38-57). Cambridge: Polity Press;
52. Thomas, C. (2004). Rescuing the Social Relational Understanding of Disability. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 6(1), 22-36.
53. Grünewald, K. (ed.) (1971). Manniskohantering på totala vårdinstitutioner: Från dehumanisering til normalisering. (Treatment of People in Total Institutions: From Dehumanization to Normalization). Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.
54. Grünewald, K. (ed.) (1989). Medicinska omsorgsboken (The Book of Medical Care). Stockholm: Natur och Kultur;
55. Kristiansen, K. (1993). Normalisering og verdsetjing av social rolle (Normalization and Social Role Valorization) Oslo: Kommuneforlaget;
56. Stangvik, G. (1987). Livskvalitet for funksjonshemmede (Quality of Life for the Disabled). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
57. Tøssebro, J. and Kittelsaa, A. (eds.) (2004). Exploring the Living Conditions of Disabled People. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
58. Tøssebro, J. (2002). Leaving the Individual Out: Practical and Logical Problems. Paper presented at a Plenary Symposium "Understanding Disability: The UK Social Model and the Nordic Relational Approach" at the 6th NNDR Conference, Disability Research, Theory and Practice, 22-24 August, Reykjavík, Iceland;
59. Tøssebro, J. (2004). Understanding Disability: Introduction to the Special Issue of SJDR. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 6(1), 3-7.
60. Rioux, M. H. (2002). Disability, Citizenship and Rights in a Changing World. In C. Barnes, M. Oliver, and L. Barton (eds.), Disability Studies Today (pp. 210-227). Cambridge: Polity Press.
61. Ingstad, B. and Whyte, S. R. (eds.) (1995). Disability and Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press;
62. Bowe, F. (1978). Handicapping America. New York: Harper and Row.
63. Amundsen, R. (1992). Disability, Handicap, and the Environment. Journal of Social Philosophy, 23(1), 105-118.
64. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps, World Health Organization (1980).
65. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, World Health Organization (2001).
66. Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities, GA Res. 48/96(1993), Introduction, para. 5.
67. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, GA Res. 61/106(2007), Preamble, para. e.