Prognostic value of surgical margin status in gastric cancer patients

ANZ Journal of Surgery

Volumn 85, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 678-684

  Liang, Yuexiang ^a   Ding, Xuewei ^a   Wang, Xiaona ^a   Wang, Baogui ^a   Deng, Jingyu ^a   Zhang, Li ^a   Liang, Han ^a  

^a TIANJIN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Gastric carcinoma; Positive surgical margin; Prognosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CANCER STAGING; CHINA; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GASTRECTOMY; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STOMACH; STOMACH NEOPLASMS; SURVIVAL RATE; TRENDS; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHINA; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GASTRECTOMY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STOMACH; STOMACH NEOPLASMS; SURVIVAL RATE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84940596362     PISSN: 14451433     EISSN: 14452197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ans.12515     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Songun I, Bonenkamp JJ, Hermans J, van Krieken JH, van de Velde CJ. Prognostic value of resection-line involvement in patients undergoing curative resections for gastric cancer. Eur. J. Cancer 1996; 32: 433-437.
2. Shen JG, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Kim J, Choi SH, Noh SH. Influence of a microscopic positive proximal margin in the treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma of the cardia. World J. Gastroenterol. 2006; 12: 3883-3886.
3. Chan WH, Wong WK, Khin LW, Chan HS, Soo KC. Significance of a positive oesophageal margin in stomach cancer. Aust. N. Z. J. Surg. 2000; 70: 700-703.
4. Kim SH, Karpeh MS, Klimstra DS, Leung D, Brennan MF. Effect of microscopic resection line disease on gastric cancer survival. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 1999; 3: 24-33.
5. Wang SY, Yeh CN, Lee HL etal. Clinical impact of positive surgical margin status on gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2009; 16: 2738-2743.
6. Cho BC, Jeung HC, Choi HJ etal. Prognostic impact of resection margin involvement after extended (D2/D3) gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a 15-year experience at a single institute. J. Surg. Oncol. 2007; 95: 461-468.
7. Nagata T, Ichikawa D, Komatsu S etal. Prognostic impact of microscopic positive margin in gastric cancer patients. J. Surg. Oncol. 2011; 104: 592-597.
8. Morgagni P, Garcea D, Marrelli D etal. Resection line involvement after gastric cancer surgery: clinical outcome in nonsurgically retreated patients. World J. Surg. 2008; 32: 2661-2667.
9. Shin D, Park SS. Clinical importance and surgical decision-making regarding proximal resection margin for gastric cancer. World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2013; 5: 4-11.
10. Wanebo HJ, Kennedy BJ, Chmiel J, Steele G Jr, Winchester D, Osteen R. Cancer of the stomach. A patient care study by the American College of Surgeons. Ann. Surg. 1993; 218: 583-592.
11. Dicken BJ, Bigam DL, Cass C, Mackey JR, Joy AA, Hamilton SM. Gastric adenocarcinoma: review and considerations for future directions. Ann. Surg. 2005; 241: 27-39.
12. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric. Cancer 2011; 14: 113-123.
13. Etoh T, Sasako M, Ishikawa K, Katai H, Sano T, Shimoda T. Extranodal metastasis is an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with gastric carcinoma. Br. J. Surg. 2006; 93: 369-373.
14. Torp SH, Skjørten FJ. The reliability of frozen section diagnosis. Acta Chir. Scand. 1990; 156: 127-130.
15. Yokota T, Yamaguchi T, Sawai K, Takahashi T. Intraoperative immunostaining for detection of invasive cells at the resection margin of Borrmann type 4 gastric carcinoma using monoclonal antibody S202. Br. J. Surg. 1989; 76: 690-692.
16. Keighley MR, Moore J, Lee JR, Malins D, Thompson H. Peroperative frozen section and cytology to assess proximal invasion in gastro-oesophageal carcinoma. Br. J. Surg. 1981; 68: 73-74.