Federalism and foreign relations: the nascent role of the Indian states

Asian Studies Review

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 463-489

  Sridharan, Kripa ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940565076     PISSN: 10357823     EISSN: 14678403     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10357820308713389     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aldecoa, Francisco, and Keating, Michael, eds. 1999. Paradiplomacy in action: The foreign relations of subnational governments, London: Frank Cass.
2. Bajpai, Nirupam, and Sachs, Jeffry D., 1999. The state of state government finances, I and II. Hindu, 6–7 December
3. Bass, Arts. 2001. Non-state actors in international relations, Aldershot: Ashgate.
4. Bullman, U. 1996. The politics of the third level. Regional and Federal Studies, 6 (2)
5. Burton, John. 1972. World society, London: Cambridge.
6. Chelliah, Raja. 1996. Towards sustainable growth: Essays in fiscal and financial sector reforms in India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
7. Copland, Ian, and Rickard, John. 1999. Federalism: Comparative perspectives from India and Australia, New Delhi: Manohar.
8. Craven, Greg. 1993. “ Federal constitutions and external relations ”. In Foreign relations and federal states, Edited by: Hocking, Brian. 9–26. London: Leicester University Press.
9. De Castro, Jose Luis. 1999. “ The other dimension of third level politics in Europe: The congress of local and regional powers of the Council of Europe ”. In Paradiplomacy in action: The foreign relations of subnational governments, Edited by: Aldecoa, Francisco, and Keating, Michael. London: Frank Cass.
10. Duchacek, Ivo. D., Latouche, Daniel, and Stevenson, Garth. 1988. Perforated sovereignties and international relations: Trans-sovereign contacts of subnational governments, New York: Greenwood Press.
11. Duchacek, Ivo D., 1991. “ Comparative federalism: An agenda for research ”. In Constitutional design and power sharing in the post-modern epoch, Edited by: Elazar, Daniel J., 23–42. Lanham: University Press of America.
12. Elazar, Daniel J., 1991. Constitutional design and power sharing in the post-modern epoch, Lanham: University Press of America.
13. Ganguly, Rajat. 1998. Kin-state interventions in ethnic conflicts: Lessons from South Asia, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
14. Hermann, Charles. 1983. “ Foreign policy ”. In Encyclopedia of policy studies, Edited by: Nagel, Stuart S., 269–97. New York: Marcel Dekker.
15. Hicks, U. K., 1978. Federalism—Failure and success: A comparative study, New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Hocking, Brian. 1993a. Localising foreign policy, London: Macmillan.
17. Hocking, Brian. 1993b. “ Patrolling the frontier: Globalization, localization and the actorness of non-central governments ”. In Paradiplomacy in action, Edited by: Aldecoa, Francisco, and Keating, Michael. 17–40. London: Frank Cass.
18. Hudson, Valerie. 1995. Foreign policy analysis: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Mershon International Studies Review, 39 (supplement 2): 209–39.
19. Hulsemeyer, Axel. Economic treaties and the problem of federal states. Paper presented at the 43rd Annual ISA Convention. March24–27, New Orleans.
20. May 2001. India and the WTO: A monthly newsletter, May, New Delhi: Ministry of Commerce & Industry.
21. Iyer, Ramaswamy R., 2001. “ Three river water treaties ”. In Conflict and peacemaking in South Asia, Edited by: Sahadevan, P., 363–95. New Delhi: Lancer's Books.
22. Jain, Purnendra. Forging new bilateral relations: Japan's sub-national governments in China. Paper presented at Conference on Contemporary China-Japan Relations. August1–2, Singapore. East Asian Institute.
23. Jenkins, Rob. 1998. “ The developmental implications of federal political institutions in India ”. In The democratic developmental state: Politics and institutional design, Edited by: Robinson, Mark, and White, Gordon. 186–214. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Jenkins, Rob. 1999. Democratic politics and economic reforms in India, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Josselin, Daphne, and Wallace, William. 2001. Non-state actors in world politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
26. Khan, Rasheeduddin. 1997. Rethinking Indian federalism, Shimla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study.
27. Kincaid, John. 2001. “ Roles of constituent governments ”.
28. Keohane, Robert O., and Nye, Joseph S., 1977. Power and interdependence: World politics in transition, Boston: Little Brown.
29. Keohane, Robert O., and Nye, Joseph S., 1972. Transnational relations and world politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Krasner, Stephen. 1993. “ Westphalia and all that ”. In Ideas and foreign policy: Beliefs, institutions and political change, Edited by: Goldstein, Judith, and Keohane, Robert. 235–64. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
31. Yuan, Lee Tsao. 1991. Growth triangle: The Johore-Singapore-Riau experience, Singapore: ISEAS.
32. Michaelman, Hans J., 1990. “ Conclusion ”. In Federalism and international relations: The role of sub-national units, Edited by: Michelman, Hans J., and Solidatos, Panayotis. 310Oxford: Clarendon Press.
33. Mitra, Subrata K., and Singh, V. B., 1999. Democracy and social change in India: A cross-sectional analysis of the national electorate, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
34. Paul, Samuel. 2000. Do states have an enabling environment for industrial growth? Some evidence from Karnataka. Economic and Political Weekly, 28 October: 3861–69.
35. Painchaud, Paul. 1977. Territorialization and internationalism: The case of Quebec. Publius, 7 (4): 161–75.
36. 1996. People's Commission on GATT: On the constitutional implications of the Final Act embodying the results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, New Delhi: Centre for the Study of Global Trade System and Development.
37. Putnam, Robert D., 1993. “ Diplomacy and domestic politics ”. In Double-edged diplomacy: International bargaining and domestic politics, Edited by: Evans, Peter B., and et al. 431–68. Berkeley: University of California Press.
38. Riker, W. 1975. “ Federalism ”. In The handbook of political science, Edited by: Greenstein, F., and Polsby, N., 93–172. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
39. Riker, W. 1996. “ European federalism: The lessons of past experience ”. In Federalizing Europe: The costs, benefits and pre-conditions of federal political systems, Edited by: Hesse, J., and Wright, V., 9–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Rosenau, James. 1972. The scientific study of foreign policy, New York: Free Press.
41. Rosenau, James. 1988. Patterned chaos in global life: Structure and process in the two worlds of world politics. International Political Science Review, 9 (4): 327–64.
42. Rosenau, James. 1990. Turbulence in world politics: A theory of change and continuity, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
43. Rudolph, Susan, and Rudolph, Lloyd. 2001. Iconisation of Chandrababu: Sharing sovereignty in India's market economy. Economic and Political Weekly, 5 May: 1541–52.
44. Saez, Lawrence. 2002. Federalism without a centre: The impact of political and economic reforms on India's federal system, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
45. Segal, Gerald. 1994. “ Deconstructing foreign relations ”. In China deconstructs: Politics, trade and regionalism, Edited by: Goodman, D. S. G., and Segal, Gerald. 322–55. London: Routledge.
46. Smith, Graham. 1995. Federalism: The multi-ethnic challenge, London: Longman.
47. Tsebelis, George. 1995. Decision-making in political systems: veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science, 25: 289–325.
48. Vithal, B. P. R., and Shastry, M. L., 2001. Fiscal federalism in India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
49. Wenger, Andreas, and Perovic, Jeronim. 1998. Russland zwisschen Zerfall und Grossmach-tanspruch. Zurcher Beitrage zur Sicherheitspolitik und Konfliktforshung, (English translation from the Web).
50. Yadav, Yogendra. 1999. Electoral politics in the times of change: India's third electoral system, 1989–1999. Economic and Political Weekly, 34 21–28 August: 2399