Advantage of hyperspectral EO-1 Hyperion over multispectral IKONOS, GeoEye-1, WorldView-2, Landsat ETM+, and MODIS vegetation indices in crop biomass estimation

ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing

Volumn 108, Issue , 2015, Pages 205-218

  Marshall, Michael ^a,b   Thenkabail, Prasad ^b  

^a WORLD AGROFORESTRY CENTRE ICRAF   (Kenya)

^b United States Geological Survey   (United States)

Author keywords

Broadbands; Crop yield; Earth observation; Narrowbands; Remote sensing

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; BANDWIDTH; BIOMASS; COTTON; DATA MINING; RADIOMETERS; REMOTE SENSING; SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION; VEGETATION;

BROADBANDS; CROP YIELD; EARTH OBSERVATIONS; HYPERSPECTRAL SENSORS; MODIS VEGETATION INDICES; NARROWBANDS; REMOTELY SENSED DATA; SPECTRAL INFORMATION;

CROPS;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ALFALFA; BROADBAND DATA; CROP YIELD; DATA MINING; EOS; GEOEYE; HYPERION; IKONOS; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; MAIZE; MODIS; PHYTOMASS; SATELLITE DATA; SPECTRAL REFLECTANCE; SPECTRAL RESOLUTION; WORLDVIEW;

GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM; MEDICAGO SATIVA; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84940536749     PISSN: 09242716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Arlot S., Celisse A. A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Statist. Surv. 2010, 4:40-79.
2. Asner G.P. Biophysical and biochemical sources of variability in canopy reflectance. Remote Sens. Environ. 1998, 64:234-253.
3. Bretherton C.S., Smith C., Wallace J.M. An intercomparison of methods for finding coupled patterns in climate data. J. Clim. 1992, 5:541-560.
4. Carter G.A. Primary and secondary effects of water content of the spectral reflectance of leaves. Am. J. Bot. 1991, 78:916-924.
5. Casa R., Jones H.G. Retrieval of crop canopy properties: a comparison between model inversion from hyperspectral data and image classification. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2004, 25:1119-1130.
6. Cetin M., Musaoglu N. Merging hyperspectral and panchromatic image data: qualitative and quantitative analysis. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2009, 7:1779-1804.
7. Dettinger M.D., Cayan D.R., Meyer M.K., Jeton A.E. Simulated hydrologic responses to climate variations and change in the Merced, Carson, and American River Basins, Sierra Nevada, California, 1900-2099. Climatic Change 2004, 62:283-317.
8. Dorigo W.A., Zurita-Milla R., De Wit A.J.W., Brazile J., Singh R., Schaepman M.E. A review on reflective remote sensing and data assimilation techniques for enhanced agroecosystem modeling. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2007, 9:165-193.
9. Elvidge C.D., Chen Z. Comparison of broad-band and narrow-band red and near-infrared vegetation indices. Remote Sens. Environ. 1995, 54:38-48.
10. 2 from land-use change?. Tellus B 2010, 62:337-351.
11. Houghton R.A., Hall F., Goetz S.J. Importance of biomass in the global carbon cycle. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci. 2009, 114(G2):G00E03.
12. Gitelson A.A., Keydan G.P., Merzlyak M.N. Three-band model for noninvasive estimation of chlorophyll, carotenoids, and anthocyanin contents in higher plant leaves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2006, 33:L11402. 10.1029/2006GL026457.
13. Goetz A.F.H. Three decades of hyperspectral remote sensing of the Earth: A personal view. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113:S5-S16.
14. Grossman Y.L., Ustin S.L., Jacquemoud S., Sanderson E.W., Schmuck G., Verdebout J. Critique of stepwise multiple linear regression for the extraction of leaf biochemistry information from leaf reflectance data. Remote Sens. Environ. 1996, 56:182-193.
15. Hair J.F., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., Black W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis 1998, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. fifth ed.
16. Hansen P.M., Schjoerring J.K. Reflectance measurement of canopy biomass and nitrogen status in wheat crops using normalized difference vegetation indices and partial least squares regression. Remote Sens. Environ. 2003, 86:542-553.
17. Huete A., Didan K., Miura T., Rodriguez E.P., Gao X., Ferreira L.G. Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sens. Environ. 2002, 83:195-213.
18. Kenny J.F., Barber N.L., Hutson S.S., Linsey K.S., Lovelace J.K., Maupin M.A. Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2005 (No. Circular 1344) 2009, United State Geological Survey, Reston, VA, p. 52.
19. Jacquemoud S., Baret F., Andrieu B., Danson F.M., Jaggard K. Extraction of vegetation biophysical parameters by inversion of the PROSPECT+SAIL models on sugar beet canopy reflectance data. Application to TM and AVIRIS sensors. Remote Sens. Environ. 1995, 52:163-172.
20. Jacquemoud S., Verhoef W., Baret F., Bacour C., Zarco-Tejada P.J., Asner G.P., Francois C., Ustin S.L. PROSPECT + SAIL models: a review of use for vegetation characterization. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113(Supplement 1):S56-S66.
21. Lu D. The potential and challenge of remote sensing-based biomass estimation. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2006, 27:1297-1328.
22. Mariotto I., Thenkabail P.S., Huete A., Slonecker E.T., Platonov A. Hyperspectral versus multispectral crop-productivity modeling and type discrimination for the HyspIRI mission. Remote Sens. Environ. 2013, 139:291-305.
23. Marshall M., Thenkabail P.S. Developing in situ non-destructive estimates of crop biomass to address issues of scale in remote sensing. Remote Sens. 2015, 7:808-835.
24. Marshall M., Thenkabail P. Biomass modeling of four leading world crops using hyperspectral narrowbands in support of HyspIRI Mission. Photogrammetric Eng. Remote Sens. 2014, 80:757-772.
25. Merton R., Huntington J. Early Simulation Results of the ARIES-1 Satellite Sensor for Multi-Temporal Vegetation Research Derived from AVIRIS 1999, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA.
26. Michaelsen J. Cross-validation in statistical climate forecast models. J. Climate Appl. Meteorol. 1987, 26:1589-1600.
27. Ollinger S.V. Sources of variability in canopy reflectance and the convergent properties of plants. New Phytol. 2011, 189:375-394.
28. Perry E.M., Roberts D.A. Sensitivity of narrow-band and broad-band indices for assessing nitrogen availability and water stress in an annual crop. Agronomy J. 2008, 100:1211-1219.
29. Richards J.A. Correcting and registering images. Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis 2013, 27-77. Springer, Berlin, New York, NY.
30. Serele, C.Z., Gwyn, Q.H.J., Boisvert, J.B., Pattey, E., McLaughlin, N., Daoust, G., 2000. Corn yield prediction with artificial neural network trained using airborne remote sensing and topographic data. In: Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, vol. 1, pp. 384-386.
31. Simon K. Hyperion Level 1GST (L1GST) Product Output Files Data Format Control Book (DFCB): Earth Observing-1 (EO-1) (No. Version 1.0) 2006, United States Geological Survey, Sioux Falls, SD.
32. Sonnentag O., Hufkens K., Teshera-Sterne C., Young A.M., Friedl M., Braswell B.H., Milliman T., O'Keefe J., Richardson A.D. Digital repeat photography for phenological research in forest ecosystems. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2012, 152:159-177.
33. Soulard C.E., Wilson T.S. Recent land-use/land-cover change in the Central California Valley. J. Land Use Sci. 2013, 10.1080/1747423X.2013.841297.
34. Spencer T., Altman P. Climate Change, Water, and Risk: Current Water Demands are not Sustainable 2010, Natural Resources Defense, New York, NY, p. 4.
35. Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., Midgley, P.M. (Eds.), 2013. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group I Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5). Cambridge Univ Press, New York.
36. Thenkabail P.S. Inter-sensor relationships between IKONOS and Landsat-7 ETM+ NDVI data in three ecoregions of Africa. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2004, 25:389-408.
37. Thenkabail P.S., Enclona E.A., Ashton M.S., Van Der Meer B. Accuracy assessments of hyperspectral waveband performance for vegetation analysis applications. Remote Sens. Environ. 2004, 91:354-376.
38. Thenkabail P.S., Mariotto I., Gumma M.K., Middleton E.M., Landis D.R., Huemmrich K.F. Selection of Hyperspectral Narrowbands (HNBs) and Composition of hyperspectral twoband vegetation indices (HVIs) for biophysical characterization and discrimination of crop types using field reflectance and hyperion/EO-1 data. IEEE J. Selected Topics Appl. Earth Observations Remote Sens. 2013, 6:427-439.
39. Thenkabail P.S., Smith R.B., De Pauw E. Hyperspectral vegetation indices and their relationships with agricultural crop characteristics. Remote Sens. Environ. 2000, 71:158-182.
40. Thenkabail P.S., Ward A.D., Lyon J.G., Merry C.J. Thematic mapper vegetation indices for determining soybean and corn growth parameters. Photogrammetric Eng. Remote Sens. 1994, 60:437-442.
41. Thorp K.R., Tian L., Yao H., Tang L. Narrow-band and derivative-based vegetation indices for hyperspectral data. Trans. ASAE 2004, 47:291-299.
42. Tu, K.P., 2000. Modeling plant-soil-atmosphere carbon dioxide exchange using optimality principles, PhD. Dissertation. University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH.
43. Tucker C.J. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sens. Environ. 1979, 8:127-150.
44. Umbach, K.W., 1997. A Statistical Tour of California's Great Central Valley. California Research Bureau, California State Library, Sacramento, CA. Retrieved from http://www.library.ca.gov/.
45. Ustin S.L., Roberts D.A., Gamon J.A., Asner G.P., Green R.O. Using imaging spectroscopy to study ecosystem processes and properties. Bioscience 2004, 54:523-533.
46. Vermeulen S.J., Challinor A.J., Thornton P.K., Campbell B.M., Eriyagama N., Vervoort J.M., Smith D.R. Addressing uncertainty in adaptation planning for agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2013, 110:8357-8362.