The last round in restructuring the city: Urban regeneration becomes a state policy of disaster prevention in Turkey

Cities

Volumn 50, Issue , 2016, Pages 40-53

  Güzey, Özlem ^a  

^a GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Disaster prevention; Disaster risk; Squatter housing; Turkey; Urban regeneration

Indexed keywords

DISASTER MANAGEMENT; INFORMAL SETTLEMENT; INNER CITY AREA; REGENERATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; URBAN AREA; URBAN HOUSING; URBAN POLICY;

TURKEY;

EID: 84940533415     PISSN: 02642751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2015.08.010     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bektaş Y. Bir kentleşme stratejisi olarak yasanin kentsel mekani dönüştürmedeki etkisi: Ankara örneği. Planlama 2014, 24(3):157-172.
2. Blaikie P., Cannon T., Davis I., Wisner B. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability, and Disasters 1994, Routledge, London.
3. Çabuk N., Çabuk A., Bakiş R. Landscape based urbanism enriched with geospatial understanding against landscape urbanism: Regeneration project proposal for Antakya City. African Journal of Agricultural Research 2013, 8(9):832-843.
4. Cutter S.L., Barnes L., Berry M., Burton C., Evans E., Tate E., et al. A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change 2008, 18(4):598-606.
5. Dinçer I˙. The impact of neoliberal policies on historic urban space: Areas of urban renewal in Istanbul. International Planning Studies 2011, 16(1):43-60.
6. Dwyer A., Zoppou C., Nielsen O., Day S., Roberts S. Quantifying social vulnerability: A methodology for identifying those at risk to natural hazards 2004, Geoscience Australia, Canberra, Australia.
7. Gunder M. Planning as the ideology of (neoliberal) space. Planning Theory 2010, 9(4):298-314.
8. Güzey Ö. Türkiye'de kentsel dönüşüm uygulamalari: neo-liberal kent politikalari, yeni kentsel aktörler ve gecekondu alanlari. I˙deal Kent 2012, 7:64-83.
9. Güzey Ö. Evaluation of urban regeneration as a government-assisted revenue strategy in Turkey: The global imperative. Companion to urban regeneration 2013, 66. Routledge. M.E. Leary, J. McCarthy (Eds.).
10. Işik O., Pinarcioğlu M. Nöbetleşe Yoksulluk, Sultanbeyli Örneği 2001, I˙letişim Yayinlari, I˙stanbul.
11. Johnson C. Creating an enabling environment for reducing disaster risk: Recent experience of regulatory frameworks for land, planning and building in low and middle-income countries. Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction 2011.
12. Karaman O. Urban renewal in Istanbul: Reconfigured spaces, robotic lives. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2012, 37(2):715-733.
13. Köktürk E., Köktürk E. Deprem ve kentsel gönüşüm ilişkileri. Jeodezi-Jeoinformasyon, Arazi Yönetimi Dergisi 2007, 97:57-64.
14. Kuhlicke C., Komac B., Zorn M. Toward more resilient societies in the field of natural hazards: Caphaz-Net's lessons learnt 2010, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ.
15. Kurtuluş H. Kentsel dönüşüme modern kent mitinin çöküşü çerçevesinden bakmak. Planlama 2006, 2:7-12.
16. Kurtuluş H. Gated communities as a representation of new upper and middle classes in Istanbul. I˙.Ü. Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi 2011, 44:49-65.
17. Peck J., Tickell A. Neoliberalizing space. Antipode 2002, 34(3):380-404.
18. Pike A., Dawley S., Tomaney J. Resilience, adaptation and adaptability. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 2010, 3(1):59-70.
19. Satterthwaite D. What role for low-income communities in urban areas in disaster risk reduction?. Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction 2011.
20. Smith N. New globalism, new urbanism: Gentrification as a global urban strategy. Antipode 2002, 34(3):427-450.
21. Swyngedouw E., Moulaert F., Rodriguez A. Neoliberal urbanism in Europe: Large-scale urban development projects and the new urban policy. Antipode 2002, 34(3):542-577.
22. Taşan-Kok T. Entrepreneurial governance: Challenges of large-scale property-led urban regeneration projects. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 2010, 101(2):126-149.
23. Türkün A. Urban regeneration and hegemonic power relationships. International Planning Studies 2011, 16(1):61-72.
24. Ulusoy A. Kentsel dönüşüm ve Ankara'da toplu konut uygulamalari. Mülkiye Dergisi 2008, 32:151-160.
25. Uzun C.N. Yeni yasal düzenlemeler ve kentsel dönüşüme etkileri. Planlama 2006, 2:49-52.
26. Wallace D., Wallace R. Urban systems during disasters: Factors for resilience. Ecology and Society 2008, 13(1):18.
27. (01.06.2015). http://www.3dkonut.com.
28. (28.11.2014). http://www.arkitera.com/haber.
29. (08.01.2015). http://www.bahtiyarcetinbas.com.
30. (13.01.2015). http://www.bizimcografya.com.
31. (24.12.2013). http://www.google.com.tr/search?q=ankara+ilceleri.
32. (28.11.2014). http://www.google.com.tr/search?q=turkiye+deprem+haritasi.
33. (28.11.2014). http://www.haberler.com.
34. (24.03.2015). http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ekonomi/28355148.asp.
35. (10.01.2015). http://www.konuttimes.com.
36. (28.11.2014). http://www.toki.gov.tr.
37. (10.01.2015). http://www.toplumsol.org/istanbulda-rantin-adi-riskli-alan.
38. (10.01.2015). http://www.yapi.com.tr.