Positive distending pressure produced by heated, humidified high flow nasal cannula as compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants

Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 119-124

  Al Alaiyan, S ^a   Dawoud, M ^a   Al Hazzani, F ^a  

^a KING FAISAL SPECIALIST HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTER   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

CPAP; Esophageal pressure; High flow nasal cannula; Premature infants; Respiratory support

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; ASSISTED VENTILATION; BIRTH WEIGHT; BRADYCARDIA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSDUCER; ESOPHAGUS PRESSURE; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEATED HUMIDIFIED HIGH FLOW NASAL CANNULA; HUMAN; INFANT; MALE; NASAL CANNULA; NASAL PRONG; NEONATAL VENTILATOR; NEWBORN APNEA; OPEN STUDY; OXYGEN SATURATION; PILOT STUDY; PNEUMOTHORAX; POSITIVE DISTENDING PRESSURE; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PREMATURITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPIRATORY GAS HUMIDIFIER; ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE; CATHETERIZATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; HEAT; INFANT, PREMATURE, DISEASES; NEWBORN; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; NOSE CAVITY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AIR PRESSURE; BRADYCARDIA; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; FEMALE; HOT TEMPERATURE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; INFANT, PREMATURE, DISEASES; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS, NEONATAL; MALE; NASAL CAVITY; PILOT PROJECTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84940529456     PISSN: 19345798     EISSN: 18784429     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/NPM-1474113     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Lindner W, Vossbeck S, Hummler H, Pohlandt F. Delivery room management of extremely low birth weight infants: Spontaneous breathing or intubation? Pediatrics 1999;103(5 Pt 1):961-7.
2. Locke RG, Wolfson MR, Shaffer TH, Rubenstein SD, Greenspan JS. Inadvertent administration of positive enddistending pressure during nasal cannula flow. Pediatrics 1993;91(1):135-8.
3. Gittermann MK, Fusch C, Gittermann AR, Regazzoni BM, Moessinger AC. Early nasal continuous positive airway pressure treatment reduces the need for intubation in very low birth weight infants. Eur J Pediatr 1997;156(5):384-8.
4. Welty SE. Overview of neonatal respiratory distress: Disorders of transition. UpToDate Online. Available at: www.uptodate.com. Accessed Oct. 6, 2013.
5. Keszler M, Plavka R. Abstract: Interaction between surfactant and ventilatory support in newborns with primary surfactant deficiency. Biol Neonate 2003;84:89-95.
6. Sreenan C, Lemke RP, Hudson-Mason A, Osiovich H. High-flow nasal cannulae in the management of apnea of prematurity: A comparison with conventional nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Pediatrics 2001;107(5):1081-3.
7. Shoemaker MT, Pierce MR, Yoder BA, Digeronimo RJ. High flownasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for neonatal respiratory disease: A retrospective study. J Perinatol 2007;27(2):85-91.
8. Holleman-Duray D, Kaupie D, Weiss MG. Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula: Use and a neonatal early extubation protocol. J Perinatol 2007;27:776-81.
9. Spence KL, Murphy D, Kilian C, McGonigle R, Kilani RA. High-flow nasal cannula as a device to provide continuous positive airway pressure in infants. J Perinatol 2007;27:772-75.
10. Saslow JG, Aghai1 ZH, Nakhla TA, Hart JJ, Lawrysh R, Stahl1 GE, Pyon KH.Work of breathing using high-flownasal cannula in preterm infants. J Perinatol 2006;26:476-80.
11. Collins CL, Holberton JR, Barfield C, Davis PG. A randomized controlled trial to compare heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulae with nasal continuous positive airway pressure postextubation in premature infants. J Pediatr 2013;162(5):949-954.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.11.016
12. Yoder BA, Stoddard RA, Li M, King J, Dirnberger DR, Abbasi S. Heated, Humidified high-flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for respiratory support in neonates. Pediatrics 2013;131(5):e1482-90. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2742
13. Lampland AL, Plumm B, Meyers PA, Worwa CT, Mammel MC. Observational study of humidified high-flow nasal cannula compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. J Pediatr 2009;154(2):177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds. 2008.07.021
14. A. Chidekel, Y. Zhu, J.Wang, J.J. Mosko, E. Rodriguez, T.H. Shaffer, The effects of gas humidification with high-flownasal cannula on cultured human airway epithelial cells. Pulm Med 2012;2012:380686. doi: 10.1155/2012/380686
15. Chang GY, Cox CA, Shaffer TH. Nasal cannula, CPAP, and high-flow nasal cannula: Effect of flow on temperature, humidity, pressure, and resistance. Biomed Instrum Technol 2011;45(1):69-74. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-45.1.69
16. Hasan RA, Habib RH. Effects of flow rate and airleak at the nares and mouth opening on positive distending pressure delivery using commercially available high-flow nasal cannula systems: A lung model study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2011;12(1):e29-33. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181d9076d
17. Fernandez-Alvarez JR, Gandhi RS, Amess P, Mahoney L, Watkins R, Rabe H. Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula versus low-flow nasal cannula as weaning mode from nasal CPAP in infants ≤28 weeks of gestation. Eur J Pediatr 2014;173(1):93-8. doi: 10.1007/s00431-013-2116-2