Non-GMO genetically edited crop plants

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 33, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 489-491

  Kanchiswamy, Chidananda Nagamangala ^a   Malnoy, Mickael ^a   Velasco, Riccardo ^a   Kim, Jin Soo ^b,c   Viola, Roberto ^a  

^a RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE   (Italy)

^b Institute for Basic Science   (South Korea)

^c Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CROPS;

CROP PLANTS; GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS; HIGH-EFFICIENCY; PLANT CELLS;

GENETICALLY MODIFIED PLANTS;

CAS9 PROTEIN; GUIDE RNA; PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CELL REGENERATION; CLUSTERED REGULARLY INTERSPACED SHORT PALINDROMIC REPEAT; CROP; DNA SEQUENCE; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PLANT CELL; PLANT GENOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; SHORT SURVEY; TRANSGENIC ORGANISM; AGRICULTURE; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

AGRICULTURE; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; RNA, GUIDE;

EID: 84940453002     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.04.002     Document Type: Short Survey

References (17)

1. Kim H., Kim J.S. A guide to genome engineering with programmable nucleases. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2014, 15:321-334.
2. Cradick T.J., et al. CRISPR/Cas9 systems targeting beta-globin and CCR5 genes have substantial off-target activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41:9584-9592.
3. Fu Y., et al. High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31:822-826.
4. Pauwels K., et al. Engineering nucleases for gene targeting: safety and regulatory considerations. New Biotechnol. 2014, 31:18-27.
5. Podevin N., et al. Site-directed nucleases: a paradigm shift in predictable, knowledge-based plant breeding. Trends Biotechnol. 2013, 31:375-383.
6. Ledford H. US regulation misses some GM crops. Nature 2013, 500:389-390.
7. Kim S., et al. Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purified Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Genome Res. 2014, 24:1012-1019.
8. Zuris J.A., et al. Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015, 33:73-80.
9. Lee J.S., et al. RNA-guided genome editing in Drosophila with the purified Cas9 protein. G3 (Bethesda) 2014, 4:1291-1295.
10. Cho S.W., et al. Heritable gene knockout in Caenorhabditis elegans by direct injection of Cas9-sgRNA ribonucleoproteins. Genetics 2013, 195:1177-1180.
11. Martin-Ortigosa S., et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticle-mediated intracellular cre protein delivery for maize genome editing via loxP site excision. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164:537-547.
12. Jensen S.P., et al. Cell penetrating peptides as an alternative transformation method in citrus. J. Citrus Pathol. 2014, 1. 10.15.
13. Waltz E. Tiptoeing around transgenics. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30:215-217.
14. Jones H.D. Regulatory uncertainty over genome editing. Nat. Plants 2015, Published online January 8, 2015. 10.1038/nplants.2014.11.
15. Nagamangala Kanchiswamy C., et al. Looking forward to genetically edited fruit crops. Trends Biotechnol. 2014, 33:62-64.
16. Araki M., et al. Caution required for handling genome editing technology. Trends Biotechnol. 2014, 32:234-237.
17. Lozano-Juste J., Cutler S.R. Plant genome engineering in full bloom. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19:284-287.