RTI school-based practices and evidence-based models

Focus on Exceptional Children

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1-15

  Mellard, Daryl F ^a   Stern, Amelia ^a   Woods, Kari ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940363622     PISSN: 0015511X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17161/foec.v43i6.6910     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ardoin, S., Witt, J., Suido, S., Connell, J., Koenig, J., Reseter, J. et al. (2004). Examining the incremental benefits of administering a maze and three versus one curriculum based measurement reading probes when conducting universal screening. School Psychology Review 33(2), 218-234.
2. Batsche, G. (2006). Response to Intervention: Policy Considerations and Implementation. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education, Inc.
3. Batsche, G., Curtis, J., Dorman, C., Castillo, J., & Porter, L. J. (2008). The Florida problem solving/response to intervention model: Implementing a statewide initiative. In S. Jimerson, M. Burns, & A. VanDerHeyden (Eds.) Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 378-395). New York, NY: Springer.
4. Bocala, C, Mello, D., Reedy, K., & Lacireno-Raquet, N. (2009). Features of slate response to intervention initiatives in Northeast and Islands Region states (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2009-No. 083). Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Institute for Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Education Laboratory Northeast and Islands.
5. Compton, D., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Bryant, J. (2006). Selecting at-risk readers in first grade for early intervention: A two-year longitudinal study of decision rules and procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 394-409. (Pubitemid 43892975)
6. Council for Exceptional Children (CEC). (2008). CEC's position on response to intervention (RTI). Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(3), 74-75.
7. Chun, M., & Witt, J. (2008). System to enhance educational performance. Retrieved from http://www.isteep.com/index.html
8. Deno, S., & Mirkin, P. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
9. Denton, C, Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., & Bryan, D. (2008). Intervention provided to linguistically diverse middle school students with severe reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23(2), 79-89.
10. Fletcher, J., & Vaughn, S. (2009). Response to intervention models as alternatives to traditional views of learning disabilities: Response to commentaries. Society for Research in Child Development, 3(1), 48-50.
11. Fuchs, D., & Deshler, D. (2007). What we need to know about responsiveness to intervention (and shouldn't be afraid to ask). Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(2), 129-136.
12. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2005). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A blueprint for practitioners, policymakers, and parents. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(1), 57-61.
13. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L., & Compton, D. (2004). Identifying reading disabilities by responsiveness-to-instruction: Specifying measures and criteria. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 27(4), 216-227. (Pubitemid 39620628)
14. Fuchs, L., Compton, D., Fuchs, D., Paulsen, K., Bryant, J., & Hamlett, C. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 493-513. (Pubitemid 41426398)
15. Fuchs, L., & Fuchs, D. (1992). Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21(1), 45-58.
16. Fuchs, L., & Fuchs, D. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22(1), 27-48.
17. Fuchs, L., & Fuchs, D. (2009). On the importance of a unified model of responsiveness to intervention. Society for Research in Child Development, 3(1), 41-43.
18. Good, R., & Kaminski, R. (2002). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Retrieved from http://dibels.uoregon.edu/measures/orf. php
19. Griffith, A., Parsons, L., Burns, M., VanDerHeyden, A., & Tilly, W. D. (2007). Response to Intervention: Research for practice. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education, Inc.
20. Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. (1992). Curriculum-based oral reading fluency norms for students in grades 2 through 5. Teaching Exceptional Children, 24(3), 41-44.
21. Hollenbeck, A. (2007). From IDEA to implementation: A discussion of foundational and future responsiveness-to-intervention research. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 22(2), 137-146.
22. Johnson, E., Mellard, D., Fuchs, D., & McKnight, M. (2006). Responsiveness to intervention (RTI): How to do it. Lawrence, KS: National Research Center on Learning Disabilities.
23. Johnson, E., Smith, L., & Harris, M. (2009). How RTI Works in Secondary Schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
24. Learning Disabilities Association of America (LDA). (2006, September) The role of parents/family in responsiveness to intervention. Author: Pittsburgh, PA.
25. Mellard, D., Byrd, S., Johnson, E., Tollefson, J., & Boesche, L. (2004). Foundations and research on identifying model responsiveness-to- intervention sites. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 27(4), 243-256.
26. Mellard, D., & Johnson, E. (2008). RTI: A practitioner's guide to implementing response to intervention. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
27. Mellard, D., McKnight, M., & Jordan, J. (2010). RTI tier structures and instructional intensity. Manuscript submitted for publication.
28. Mellard, D., McKnight, M., & Woods, K. (2009). Response to intervention screening and progress monitoring practices in 41 local schools. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 24(4), 186-195.
29. Mellard, D., McKnight, M., Woods, K., & Frey, B. (n.d.). School-wide student outcomes as evidential validity of response to intervention frameworks. Manuscript submitted for publication.
30. Reynolds, C., & Shaywitz, S. (2009). Response to intervention: Prevention and remediation, perhaps. Diagnosis, no. Society for Research in Child Development, 5(1), 44-47.
31. Shinn, M. R. (2008). Implementation in secondary schools. In S. Fernley, S. D. LaRue, & J. Norlin, (Eds.). What do I do when: Answer book on RTI. (pp. 8:1-17). Arlington, VA: LRP Publications.
32. Sugai, G., & Horner, R. (2007a). Response to intervention logic and positive behavior support [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from http://www.pbis.org/main.htm
33. Sugai, G., & Horner, R. (2007b). Evidence base for school-wide positive behavior support [PDF file]. Retrieved from http://www.pbis.org/main. htm
34. VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Burns, M. K. (2005). Using curriculum-based assessment and curriculum-based measurement to guide elementary mathematics instruction: Effect on individual and group accountability scores. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30, 15-31.
35. VanDerHeyden, A., & Witt. J. (2005). Quantifying context in assessment: Capturing the effect of base rates on teacher referral and a problem-solving model of identification. School Psychology Review, 34(2), 161-183. (Pubitemid 41017196)
36. VanDerHeyden, A., Witt, J., & Gilbertson, G. (2007). A multi-year evaluation of the effects of a response to intervention (RTI) model on identification of children for special education. Journal of School Psychology, 45(2), 225-256.
37. VanDerHeyden, A., Witt, J., & Naquin, G. (2003). The development and validation of a process for screening and referrals to special education. School Psychology Review, 32(2), 204-227. (Pubitemid 36990037)
38. Vaughn, S. (2005). Interpretation of the 3-tier framework. Retrieved from http://www.texasreading.org/utcrla/materials/3tier-letter.asp
39. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69(4), 391-409 (Pubitemid 39443188)