Classification and dynamic assessment of children with learning disabilities

Focus on Exceptional Children

Volumn 28, Issue 9, 1996, Pages 1-20

  Swanson, H Lee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940363601     PISSN: 0015511X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17161/fec.v28i9.6858     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. London: Oxford University Press.
2. Bateman, B. (1965). An educator's view of a diagnostic approach to learning disorders. In J. Hellmuth (Ed.) Learning Disorders (Vol. 1, pp. 219-239). Seattle: Special Child.
3. Bateman, B. (1992). Learning disabilities: The changing landscape. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25,29-37.
4. Bereiter, C. (1963). Some persisting dilemmas in the measurement of change. In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change (pp. 3-20). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
5. Bransford, J. C., Deletes, J. R., Vye, N. J., Burns, M., & Hasselbring, T. S. (1987). State of the art and future directions. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 479-496). New York: Guilford Press.
6. Brown, A., Campione, J. C., Webber, L. S., & McGilly, K. (1992). Interactive learning environment: A new look at assessment and instruction. In B. Gifford & M. C. O'Connor (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement and instruction (pp. 121-211). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
7. Brown. A., & French, L. (1979). The zone of potential development: Implications for intelligence in the year 2000. Intelligence, 4,255-273.
8. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1987). Application of hierarchical linear models to assessing change. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 147-158.
9. Budoff, M. (1987). Measures for assessing learning potential. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: Foundations and fundamentals (pp. 173-195). New York: Guilford Press.
10. Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: Foundations and fundamentals (pp. 82-115). New York: Guilford Press.
11. Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L., Ferrara, R. A., Jones, R. S., & Steinberg, E. (1985). Breakdowns in flexible use of information: Intelligencerelated differences in transfer following equivalent learning performance. Intelligence, 9,297-315.
12. Cantor, J., & Engle, R. W. (1993). Working memory as capacity in long term memory activation: An individual difference approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 9,1101-1114.
13. Cantor, J., Engle, R. W., & Hamilton, G. (1991). Short-term memory, working memory, and verbal abilities: How do they relate? Intelligence, 15,229-246.
14. Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1979). Toward a differential testing approach: Testing the limits employing the Raven Matrices. Intelligence, 3, 323-344.
15. Carpenter, P. A., Just, M., & Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 97,404-431.
16. Cronbach, L., & Furby, L. (1970). How we should measure "change"or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68-80.
17. Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1953). Assessing similarity between profiles. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68-80.
18. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
19. Daneman, M., & Green, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 1-18.
20. Embretson, S. E. (1987). Toward development of a psychometric approach. In C. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: Foundations and fundamentals (pp. 141-172). New York: Guilford Press.
21. Engle, R., Cantor, J., & Carullo, J. (1992). Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 972-992.
22. Ferrara, R. A., Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1986). Children's learning and transfer of inductive reasoning rules: Studies in proximal development. Child Development, 57, 1087-1099.
23. Feuerstein, R. (1980). Instrumental enrichment: An intervention program for cognitive modifiability. Baltimore: University Park Press.
24. Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Rourke, B. P., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (1992). The validity of discrepancy-based definitions of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 555-561.
25. Fletcher, J., Shaywitz, S. E., Shankweiler, D. P., Katz, L., Liberman, I., Stuebing, K., Francis, D., Fowler, A., & Shaywitz, B. A. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86,6-23.
26. Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Stuebing, K. K., Davidson, K. C., & Thompson, N. M. (1991). Analysis of change: Modeling individual growth. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology 59, 27-37.
27. Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1989). Evaluation of the role of phonological STM in the development of vocabulary in children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 200-213.
28. Gerber, P. I., & Reiff, H. B. (1991). Speaking for themselves: Ethnographic interviews with adults with learning disabilities. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
29. Hammill, D. D. (1990). On defining learning disabilities: An emerging consensus. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 74-84.
30. Hammill, D. D., Leigh, J. E., McNutt, G., & Larsen, S. C. (1981). A new definition of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 36-42.
31. Haywood, H. C., Brown, A. L., & Wingenfeld, S. (1990). Dynamic approaches to psychoeducational assessment. School Psychology Review, 79,411-422.
32. Jastak, J. J., & Wilkinson, S. (1984). Manual: The Wide Range Achievement Tests. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.
33. Johns, G. (1981). Difference score measures of organizational behavior variables: A critique. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 27, 44-46.
34. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working-memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
35. Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more) working-memory capacity ?!. Intelligence, 14, 389-433.
36. Lord, F. M. (1956). The measurement of growth. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 16, 421-437.
37. Monroe, M. (1932). Children who cannot read. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. Morrison, S. R., & Siegel, L. S. (1991). Learning disabilities: A critical review of definitional and assessment issues. In J. E. Obrzut & G. W. Hynd (Eds.), Neurological foundations of learning disabilities: A handbook of issues, methods, and practice (pp. 79-95). San Diego: Academic Press.
39. Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1988). Planning-arousal-simultaneous-successive (PASS): A model for assessment. Journal of School Psychology, 26, 35-48.
40. Palincsar, A., Brown, A., & Campione, J. (1991). Dynamic assessment. In H. L. Swanson (Ed.), Handbook on the assessment of learning disabilities: Theory, research and practice (pp. 75-95). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
41. Reynolds, C. R. (1984). Critical measurement issues in learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 18,453-176.
42. Reynolds, C. R. (1985). Measuring the aptitude-achievement discrepancy in learning disability diagnosis. Remedial & Special Education, 18, 453-476.
43. Rogosa, D. R. (1988). Myths about longitudinal research. In K. W. Schaie, R. T. Campbell, W. Meredith, & S. C. Rawlings (Eds.), Methodological issues in aging research (pp. 171-210). New York: Springer-Verlag.
44. Rousch, W. (1995). Arguing over why Johnny can't read. Science, 267, 1896-1898.
45. Rutter, M., & Yulle, NV. (1975). The concept of specific reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 16, 181-197.
46. Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structures. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
47. Shankweiler, D., & Grain, S. (1986). Language mechanisms and reading disorder: A modular approach. Cognition, 24, 139-168.
48. Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M., Holahan, J. M., & Shaywitz, S. E. (1992). Discrepancy compared to low achievement definitions of reading disability: Results from the Connecticut Longitudinal Study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 639-648.
49. Shephard, L. A. (1980). An evaluation of the regression discrepancy method for identifying children with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 14,19-91.
50. Shepherd, L. A., Smith, M. L., & Vojir, C. P. (1983). Characteristics of pupils identified as learning disabled. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 309-331.
51. Siegel, L. S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469-478.
52. Siegel, L. S. (1992). An evaluation of the discrepancy definition of dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 618-629.
53. Siegel, L. S., & Ryan, E. B. (1989). The development of working-memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled. Child Development, 60, 973-980.
54. Sovik, N., Frostad, P., & Lie, A. (1994) Can discrepancy between IQ and basic skills be explained by learning strategies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 389-405.
55. Sparks, R. L. (1995). Phonological awareness in hyperlexic children. Reading & Writing, 7, 217-235.
56. Speece, D., Cooper, D., & Kigler, J. (1990). Dynamic assessment, individual differences, and academic achievement. Learning & Individual Differences, 2,113-127.
57. Stanley, J. C. (1967). General and spécial formulas for the reliability of differences. Journal of Educational Measurement, 4, 29-252.
58. Stanovich, K.(1986). Matthew effect in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
59. Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 7-29.
60. Stanovich, K., & Siegel, L. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24-53.
61. Stemberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Swanson,'H. L. (1988). Toward a metatheory of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 196-209.
63. Swanson, H. L. (1992). Generality and modifiability of working memory among skilled and less skilled readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84,473-488.
64. Swanson, H. L. (1993a). An information processing analysis of learning disabled children's problem solving. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 861-895.
65. Swanson, H. L. (1993b). Individual differences in working memory: A model testing and subgroup analysis. Intelligence, 17, 285-332.
66. Swanson, H. L. (1993c). Working memory in learning disability sub. types. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 87-114.
67. Swanson, H. L. (1995). Swanson-cognitive processing test. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
68. Swanson, H. L. (in press a). Effects of dynamic testing in the classification of learning disabilities: The predictive and discriminant validity of the S-CPT. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment.
69. Swanson, H. L. (in press b). Using the S-CPT to assess processing ability: The development of a dynamic assessment measure. School Psychology Review.
70. Swanson, H. L., & Christie, L. (1994). Implicit notions about learning disabilities: Some directions for definitions. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9, 244-254.
71. Swanson, H. L., Cooney, J. B., & Brock, S. (1993). The influence of memory and classification ability on children's word problem solution. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 374-395.
72. USOE. (1994). Assistance to states for education of handicapped children: Procedures for evaluating specific learning disabilities. Federal Register, 42, 65082-65085.
73. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds. and Trans.), Mind in society: Tlie development of higher psychological processes (pp. 79-91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1935)
74. Wall, T. D., & Payne, R. (1973). Are deficiency scores deficient? Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 322-326.
75. Wanous, J. P., & Lawler, E. E. Ill (1972). Measurement and meaning of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 95-105.
76. Zimmerman, D. W., & Williams, R. H. (1982). Gain scores in research can be highly reliable. Journal of Educational Measurement, 19, 149-154.