Percutaneous vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: High-viscosity versus low-viscosity bone cement

Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research

Volumn 18, Issue 16, 2014, Pages 2461-2467

  Huang, Xiao nan ^a  

^a Department of Orthopedic Surgery Heze Municipal Hospital ^*  (China)

Author keywords

Biocompatible materials; Osteoporosis; Spinal fractures; Vertebroplasty

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; HIGH VISCOSITY BONE CEMENT; LOW VISCOSITY BONE CEMENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BONE CEMENT LEAKAGE; DEVICE FAILURE; FOLLOW UP; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OSTEOPOROTIC VERTEBRAL FRACTURE; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS VERTEBROPLASTY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; SPINE FRACTURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISCOSITY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 84940361208     PISSN: 16738225     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2014.16.001     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Thillainadesan J, Schlaphoff G, Gibson KA, et al. Long-term outcomes of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic compression fractures. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2010;54(4):307-314.
2. Ross PD. Osteoporosis Frequency, Consequences, and Risk Factor. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(13):1399-1411.
3. Rousing R, Hansen KL, Andersen MO, et al. Twelve-months follow-up in forty-nine patients with acute/semiacute osteoporotic vertebral fractures treatedconservatively or with percutaneous vertebroplasty:aclinical randomized study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(5):478-482.
4. Heini PF. Vertebroplasty: an update: value of percutaneous cement augmentation after randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Orthopade. 2010;39(7):658-664.
5. Becker S, Pfeiffer KP, Ogon M. Comparison of inpatient treatment costs after balloon kyphoplasty and non-surgical treatment of vertebral body compression fractures. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(8):1259-1264.
6. Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, et al. Preliminary report on the percutaneous vertebroplasty with acrylic cement as a treatment of vertebral angioma. Neurochirurgie. 1987;33(2): 166-168.
7. Anselmetti GC, Muto M, Guglielmi G, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Radiol Clin North(Am). 2010; 48(3):641-649.
8. Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR, et al. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebralfractures. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:557-568.
9. Anselmetti GC, Zoarski G, Manca A, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty and bone cement leakage: clinical experience with a new high-viscosity bone cement and delivery system for vertebral augmentation in benign and malignant compression fractures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008; 31(5):937-947
10. Venmans A, Klazen CA, van Rooij WJ, et al. Postprocedural CT for perivertebral cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty is not necessary--results from VERTOS II. Neuroradiology. 2011;53(1):19-22.
11. Hadjipavlou AG, Tzermiadianos MN, Katonis PG, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and osteolytic tumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(12): 1595-1604.
12. Bhatia C, Barzilay Y, Krishna M, et al. Cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty: effect of preinjection gelfoam embolization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(8):915-919.
13. Pérez-Higueras A, Alvarez L, Rossi RE, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty: long-term clinical and radiological outcome. Neuroradiology. 2002; 44(11):950-954.
14. Jung JY, Lee MH, Ahn JM. Leakage of polymethylmethacrylate in percutaneous vertebroplasty: comparison of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with and without an intravertebral vacuum cleft. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006; 30(3):501-506.
15. Mac Taggart JN, Pipinos II, Johanning JM, et al. Acrylic cement pulmonary embolus masquerading as an embolized central venous catheter fragment. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43(1):180-183.
16. Bose R, Choi JW. Successful percutaneous retrieval of methyl methacrylate orthopedic cement embolism from the pulmonary artery. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;76(2): 198-201.
17. Cadeddu C, Nocco S, Secci E, et al. Echocardiographic accidental finding of asymptomatic cardiac and pulmonary embolism caused by cement leakage after percutaneous vertebroplasty. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10(4):590-592.
18. Lim SH, Kim H, Kim HK, et al. Multiple cardiac perforations and pulmonary embolism caused by cement leakage after percutaneous vertebroplasty. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008; 33(3):510-512.
19. Son KH, Chung JH, Sun K, et al. Cardiac perforation and tricuspid regurgitation as a complication of percutaneous vertebroplasty. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;33(3): 508-509.
20. Baroud G, Crookshank M, Bohner M. High-viscosity cement significantly enhances uniformity of cement filling in vertebroplasty: an experimental model and study on cement leakage. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(22):2562-2568.
21. Mohamed R, Silbermann C, Ahmari A, et al. Cement filling control and bone marrow removal in vertebral body augmentation by unipedicular aspiration technique: an experimental study using leakage model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(3):353-360.
22. Loeffel M, Ferguson SJ, Nolte LP, et al. Vertebroplasty: experimental characterization of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement spreading as a function of viscosity, bone porosity, and flow rate. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(12): 1352-1359.
23. Benneker LM, Heini PF, Suhm N, et al. The effect of pulsed jet lavage in vertebroplasty on injection forces of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement, material distribution, and potential fat embolism: a cadaver study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(23):E906-910.
24. Anselmetti GC, Zoarski G, Manca A, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty and bone cement leakage: clinical experience with a new high-viscosity bone cement and delivery system for vertebral augmentation in benign and malignant compression fractures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008; 31(5):937-947.
25. Rodrigues DC, Gilbert JL, Hasenwinkel JM. Pseudoplasticity and setting properties of two-solution bone cement containing poly(methyl methacrylate) microspheres and nanospheres for kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;91(1):248-256.
26. Kiner DW, Wybo CD, Sterba W, et al. Biomechanical analysis of different techniques in revision spinal instrumentation: larger diameter screws versus cement augmentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(24):2618-2622.