Decision aids for randomised controlled trials: A qualitative exploration of stakeholders' views

BMJ Open

Volumn 4, Issue 8, 2014, Pages

  Gillies, Katie ^a   Skea, Zoë C ^a   Campbell, Marion K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MANAGER; NURSE; PATIENT INFORMATION; PERCEPTION; PROBABILITY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; ADULT; ATTITUDE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERSONNEL; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PUBLICATION;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; ETHICS COMMITTEES; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAMPHLETS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERCEPTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH PERSONNEL;

EID: 84940247675     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005734     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
2. World Medical Association (WMA). WMA declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Ferney-Voltaire: WMA, 2008. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html
3. International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6(R1). Geneva: ICH, 1996. [Step 4 version]
4. National Research Ethics Service (NRES). Information sheet and consent forms: guidance for researchers and reviewers. London: National Health Service, National Patient Safety Agency, 2009.
5. Flory J, Emanuel E. Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review. JAMA 2000;6:1593- 601.
6. Nishimura A, Carey J, Erwin PJ, et al. Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: a systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials. BMC Med Ethics 2013;14:28.
7. Armstrong N, Dixon-Woods M, Thomas A, et al. Do informed consent documents for cancer trials do what they should? A study of manifest and latent functions. Sociol Health Illn 2012;34:1230-45.
8. Abhyankar P. Decision making about cancer treatment and clinical trial participation. PhD thesis. Leeds: University of Leeds, 2008.
9. Gillies K, Entwistle V. Supporting positive experiences and sustained participation in clinical trials: looking beyond information provision. J Med Ethics 2012;38:751-6.
10. Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;10:CD001431.
11. Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, et al. International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ 2006;333:417.
12. Gillies K, Huang W, Skea Z, et al. Patient information leaflets (PILs) for UK randomised controlled trials: a feasibility study exploring whether they contain information to support decision making about trial participation. Trials 2014;15:62.
13. Juraskova I, Butow P, Lopez A, et al. Improving informed consent: a pilot of a decision aid for women invited to participate in a breast cancer prevention trial (IBIS-II DCIS). Health Expect 2008;11:252-62.
14. Sundaresan P, Turner S, Kneebone A, et al. Evaluating the utility of a patient decision aid for potential participants of a prostate cancer trial (RAVES-ROG 08.03). Radiother Oncol 2011;101:521-4.
15. Abhyankar P, Bekker HL, Summers BA, et al. Why values elicitation techniques enable people to make informed decisions about cancer trial participation. Health Expect 2011;14:20-32.
16. Wyatt KD, Branda ME, Anderson RT, et al . Peering into the black box: a meta-analysis of how clinicians use decision aids during clinical encounters. Implement Sci 2014;9:26.
17. Elwyn G, Scholl I, Tietbohl C, et al. "Many miles to go ...": a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013;13(Suppl 2):S14.
18. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al.; Medical Research Council Guidance. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008;337:a1655.
19. Gillies K, Skea Z, Politi MC, et al. Decision support interventions for people making decisions about participation in clinical trials (Protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;(3):CD009736.
20. Gillies K, Skea ZC, MacLennan SJ, et al. Determining information for inclusion in a decision-support intervention for clinical trial participation: a modified Delphi approach. Clin Trials 2013;10:967-76.
21. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R, eds. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge, 1993:173-94.
22. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Notes 2006;18:59-82.
23. Abhyankar P, Summers BA, Velikova G, et al. Framing options as choice or opportunity: does the frame influence decisions? Med Decis Making 2014;34:567-82.
24. Wray RJ, Stryker JE, Winer E, et al. Do cancer patients fully understand clinical trial participation? A pilot study to assess informed consent and patient expectations. J Cancer Educ 2007;22:21-4. (Pubitemid 47110496)
25. http://healthtalkonline.org/peoples-experiences/medical-research/ clinical-trials/topics
26. http://www.nih.gov/health/clinicaltrials/stories/index.htm
27. Winterbottom A, Bekker HL, Conner M, et al. Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic review. Soc Sci Med 2008;67:2079-88.
28. Kirkby HM, Calvert M, Draper H, et al. What potential research participants want to know about research: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2012;2:e000509.
29. O'Connor AM, Tugwell P, Wells GA, et al. A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation. Patient Educ Couns 1998;33:267-79. (Pubitemid 28168092)
30. Bird JH, Biggs TC, Bennett WO, et al. Patient preferences for the method of delivery of preoperative patient information. Bull R Coll Surg England 2013;95:228-30.
31. Synnot A, Ryan R, Prictor M, et al. Audio-visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(5):CD003717.
32. Townsend A, Cox SM. Volunteering for research: accessing health services through the back door? BMC Medical Ethics 2013;14:40.