Accelerometric assessment of different dimensions of natural walking during the first year after stroke: Recovery of amount, distribution, quality and speed of walking

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 47, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 714-721

  Sánchez, Marina Castel ^a   Bussmann, Johannes ^b   Janssen, Wim ^b   Horemans, Herwin ^b   Chastin, Sebastian ^c   Heijenbrok, Majanka ^d   Stam, Henk ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d Erasmus MC University Medical Center and Rijndam Rehabilitation Center Rotterdam   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Accelerometry; Activities of daily living; Gait; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETRY; AGED; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPLICATION; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGY; WALKING;

ACCELEROMETRY; ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STROKE; WALKING;

EID: 84940118356     PISSN: 16501977     EISSN: 16512081     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1994     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. World Health Organization. International classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
2. Rueterbories J, Spaich EG, Larsen B, Andersen OK. Methods for gait event detection and analysis in ambulatory systems. Med Eng Phys 2010; 32: 545-552.
3. Resnick B, Michael K, Shaughnessy M, Nahm ES, Kobunek S, Sorkin J, et al. Inflated perceptions of physical activity after stroke: pairing self-report with physiologic measures. J Phys Act Health 2008; 5: 308-318.
4. Gebruers N, Vanroy C, Truijen S, Engelborghs S, De Deyn PP. Monitoring of physical activity after stroke: a systematic review of accelerometry-based measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91: 288-297.
5. Manns PJ, Baldwin E. Ambulatory activity of stroke survivors: measurement options for dose, intensity, and variability of activity. Stroke 2009; 40: 864-867.
6. van den Berg-Emons RJ, Bussmann JB, Stam HJ. Accelerometrybased activity spectrum in persons with chronic physical conditions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91: 1856-1861.
7. Bussmann JB, Tulen JH, van Herel EC, Stam HJ. Quantification of physical activities by means of ambulatory accelerometry: a validation study. Psychophysiology 1998; 35: 488-496.
8. Bussmann JB, van de Laar YM, Neeleman MP, Stam HJ. Ambulatory accelerometry to quantify motor behaviour in patients after failed back surgery: a validation study. Pain 1998; 74: 153-161.
9. Bussmann HB, Reuvekamp PJ, Veltink PH, Martens WL, Stam HJ. Validity and reliability of measurements obtained with an "activity monitor" in people with and without a transtibial amputation. Phys Ther 1998; 78: 989-998.
10. van den Berg-Emons HJ, Bussmann JB, Balk AH, Stam HJ. Validity of ambulatory accelerometry to quantify physical activity in heart failure. Scand J Rehabil Med 2000; 32: 187-192.
11. Prajapati SK, Gage WH, Brooks D, Black SE, McIlroy WE. A novel approach to ambulatory monitoring: investigation into the quantity and control of everyday walking in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011; 25: 6-14.
12. Shaughnessy M, Michael KM, Sorkin JD, Macko RF. Steps after stroke: capturing ambulatory recovery. Stroke 2005; 36: 1305-1307.
13. Baert I, Feys H, Daly D, Troosters T, Vanlandewijck Y. Are patients 1 year post-stroke active enough to improve their physical health? Disabil Rehabil 2012; 34: 574-580.
14. Chastin SF, Granat MH. Methods for objective measure, quantification and analysis of sedentary behaviour and inactivity. Gait Posture 2010; 31: 82-86.
15. Lord S, Chastin SF, McInnes L, Little L, Briggs P, Rochester L. Exploring patterns of daily physical and sedentary behaviour in community-dwelling older adults. Age Ageing 2011; 40: 205-210.
16. Frazer SW, Hellebrand WE, Keijsers NL. Variation and achievement of ambulatory activity among patients with chronic stroke. J Rehabil Med 2013; 45: 848-853.
17. Raja B, Neptune RR, Kautz SA. Quantifiable patterns of limb loading and unloading during hemiparetic gait: Relation to kinetic and kinematic parameters. J Rehabil Res Dev 2012; 49: 1293-1304.
18. Lopez-Meyer P, Fulk GD, Sazonov ES. Automatic detection of temporal gait parameters in poststroke individuals. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2011; 15: 594-601.
19. Bowden MG, Balasubramanian CK, Behrman AL, Kautz SA. Validation of a speed-based classification system using quantitative measures of walking performance poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008; 22: 672-675.
20. van de Port IG, Kwakkel G, Lindeman E. Community ambulation in patients with chronic stroke: how is it related to gait speed? J Rehabil Med 2008; 40: 23-27.
21. Tieges Z, Mead G, Allerhand M, Duncan F, van Wijck F, Fitzsimons C, et al. Sedentary behavior in the first year after stroke: a longitudinal cohort study with objective measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015; 96: 15-23.
22. Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Cerin E, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, et al. Breaks in sedentary time: beneficial associations with metabolic risk. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 661-666.
23. Mudge S, Barber PA, Stott NS. Circuit-based rehabilitation improves gait endurance but not usual walking activity in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90: 1989-1996.
24. Janssen W, Bussmann J, Selles R, Koudstaal P, Ribbers G, Stam H. Recovery of the sit-to-stand movement after stroke: a longitudinal cohort study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010; 24: 763-769.
25. Bussmann JB, Martens WL, Tulen JH, Schasfoort FC, van den Berg-Emons HJ, Stam HJ. Measuring daily behavior using ambulatory accelerometry: the Activity Monitor. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2001; 33: 349-356.
26. Bussmann JBJ. Feasibility of ambulatory measurement of prosthetic gait in the early phase of rehabilitation. Ambulatory monitoring of mobility-related activities in rehabilitation medicine [PhD thesis]. Eburon: Delft, The Netherlands; 2008, p. 171-189.
27. Moe-Nilssen R, Helbostad JL. Estimation of gait cycle characteristics by trunk accelerometry. J Biomech 2004; 37: 121-126.
28. Bussmann JB, van den Berg-Emons HJ, Angulo SM, Stijnen T, Stam HJ. Sensitivity and reproducibility of accelerometry and heart rate in physical strain assessment during prosthetic gait. Eur J Appl Physiol 2004; 91: 71-78.
29. Bussmann JB, Hartgerink I, van der Woude LH, Stam HJ. Measuring physical strain during ambulation with accelerometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 1462-1471.
30. Kollen B, van de Port I, Lindeman E, Twisk J, Kwakkel G. Predicting improvement in gait after stroke: a longitudinal prospective study. Stroke 2005; 36: 2676-2680.
31. Askim T, Bernhardt J, Churilov L, Fredriksen KR, Indredavik B. Changes in physical activity and related functional and disability levels in the first six months after stroke: a longitudinal follow-up study. J Rehabil Med 2013; 45: 423-428.
32. Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 27-32.
33. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004; 22: 281-299.
34. West T, Bernhardt J. Physical activity in hospitalised stroke patients. Stroke Res Treat 2012; 2012: 813765.
35. Michael KM, Allen JK, Macko RF. Reduced ambulatory activity after stroke: the role of balance, gait, and cardiovascular fitness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 1552-1556.
36. Patterson KK, Gage WH, Brooks D, Black SE, McIlroy WE. Changes in gait symmetry and velocity after stroke: a crosssectional study from weeks to years after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010; 24: 783-790.
37. Michael K, Goldberg AP, Treuth MS, Beans J, Normandt P, Macko RF. Progressive adaptive physical activity in stroke improves balance, gait, and fitness: preliminary results. Top Stroke Rehabil 2009; 16: 133-139.
38. Mudge S, Stott NS. Test-retest reliability of the StepWatch Activity Monitor outputs in individuals with chronic stroke. Clin Rehabil 2008; 22: 871-877.