The Impact of Genetic Relationship and Linkage Disequilibrium on Genomic Selection

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 7, 2015, Pages

  Liu, Hongjun ^a   Zhou, Huangkai ^b   Wu, Yongsheng ^c   Li, Xiao ^d   Zhao, Jing ^e   Zuo, Tao ^e   Zhang, Xuan ^b   Zhang, Yongzhong ^a   Liu, Sisi ^a   Shen, Yaou ^a   Lin, Haijian ^a   Zhang, Zhiming ^a   Huang, Kaijian ^c   Lübberstedt, Thomas ^e   Pan, Guangtang ^a  

^a SICHUAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Guangzhou FitGene Biotechnology CO LTD   (China)

^c NATIONAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER FOR NON FOOD BIOREFINERY   (China)

^d CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (China)

^e IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOUNDER EFFECT; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC DISTANCE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC SELECTION; MAIZE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; NONHUMAN; PEDIGREE; POPULATION STRUCTURE; PREDICTION; PROGENY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETICS;

LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MODELS, GENETIC; SELECTION, GENETIC; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84940094726     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132379     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ganal MW, Durstewitz G, Polley A, Berard A, Buckler ES, Charcosset A, et al. A large maize (Zeamays L.) SNP genotyping array: development and germplasm genotyping, and genetic mapping to compare with the B73 reference genome. PloS one. 2011; 6(12):e28334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028334 PMID: 22174790
2. Huang X, Feng Q, Qian Q, Zhao Q, Wang L, Wang A, et al. High-throughput genotyping by wholegenome resequencing. Genome research. 2009; 19(6):1068-76. doi: 10.1101/gr.089516.108 PMID: 19420380
3. Elshire RJ, Glaubitz JC, Sun Q, Poland JA, Kawamoto K, Buckler ES, et al. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PloS one. 2011; 6(5):e19379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019379 PMID: 21573248
4. Melchinger AE, Utz HF, Schön CC. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping using different testers and independent population samples in maize reveals low power of QTL detection and large bias in estimates of QTL effects. Genetics. 1998; 149(1):383-403. PMID: 9584111
5. Lande R, Thompson R. Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics. 1990; 124(3):743-56. PMID: 1968875
6. Meuwissen THE, Hayes B, Goddard M. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 2001; 157(4):1819-29. PMID: 11290733
7. VanRaden P, Van Tassell C, Wiggans G, Sonstegard T, Schnabel R, Taylor J, et al. Invited Review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. Journal of dairy science. 2009; 92 (1):16-24. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1514 PMID: 19109259
8. Xu Y, Crouch JH. Marker-assisted selection in plant breeding: from publications to practice. Crop Science. 2008; 48(2):391-407.
9. Whittaker JC, Thompson R, Denham MC. Marker-assisted selection using ridge regression. Genetical research. 2000; 75(2):249-52. PMID: 10816982
10. Bennewitz J, Solberg T, Meuwissen T. Genomic breeding value estimation using nonparametric additive regression models. Genet Sel Evol. 2009; 41:20. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-41-20 PMID: 19284696
11. Wei Z, Wang K, Qu H-Q, Zhang H, Bradfield J, Kim C, et al. From disease association to risk assessment: an optimistic view from genome-wide association studies on type 1 diabetes. PLoS genetics. 2009; 5(10):e1000678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000678 PMID: 19816555
12. Long N, Gianola D, Rosa G, Weigel K, Avendano S. Machine learning classification procedure for selecting SNPs in genomic selection: application to early mortality in broilers. Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie. 2007; 124(6):377-89. PMID: 18076475
13. Luan T, Woolliams JA, Lien S, Kent M, Svendsen M, Meuwissen TH. The accuracy of genomic selection in Norwegian red cattle assessed by cross-validation. Genetics. 2009; 183(3):1119-26. doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.107391 PMID: 19704013
14. Lorenzana RE, Bernardo R. Accuracy of genotypic value predictions for marker-based selection in biparental plant populations. Theoretical and applied genetics. 2009; 120(1):151-61. doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-1166-3 PMID: 19841887
15. Crossa J, de Los Campos G, Pérez P, Gianola D, Burgueño J, Araus JL, et al. Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers. Genetics. 2010; 186 (2):713-24. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.118521 PMID: 20813882
16. Hayes B, Bowman P, Chamberlain A, Goddard M. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges. Journal of dairy science. 2009; 92(2):433-43. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1646 PMID: 19164653
17. Solberg T, Sonesson A, Woolliams J. Genomic selection using different marker types and densities. Journal of animal science. 2008; 86(10):2447-54. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0010 PMID: 18407980
18. Zhong S, Dekkers JC, Fernando RL, Jannink J-L. Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a barley case study. Genetics. 2009; 182(1):355-64. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.098277 PMID: 19299342
19. Habier D, Fernando R, Dekkers J. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics. 2007; 177(4):2389-97. PMID: 18073436
20. Bernardo R, Yu J. Prospects for genomewide selection for quantitative traits in maize. Crop Science. 2007; 47(3):1082-90.
21. Riedelsheimer C, Czedik-Eysenberg A, Grieder C, Lisec J, Technow F, Sulpice R, et al. Genomic and metabolic prediction of complex heterotic traits in hybrid maize. Nature genetics. 2012; 44(2):217-20 doi: 10.1038/ng.1033 PMID: 22246502
22. Habier D, Tetens J, Seefried F-R, Lichtner P, Thaller G. The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle. Genetics, selection, evolution: GSE. 2010; 42 (1):5.
23. Hussain T, Tausend P, Graham G, Ho J. Registration of IBM2 SYN10 doubled haploid mapping population of maize. Journal of Plant Registrations. 2007; 1(1):81-81.
24. Lee M, Sharopova N, Beavis WD, Grant D, Katt M, Blair D, et al. Expanding the genetic map of maize with the intermated B73 x Mo17 (IBM) population. Plant molecular biology. 2002; 48(5-6):453-61. PMID: 11999829.
25. Lawrence CJ, Harper LC, Schaeffer ML, Sen TZ, Seigfried TE, Campbell DA. MaizeGDB: the maize model organism database for basic, translational, and applied research. International journal of plant genomics. 2008; 2008.
26. Huang X, Kurata N, Wei X, Wang Z-X, Wang A, Zhao Q, et al. A map of rice genome variation reveals the origin of cultivated rice. Nature. 2012; 490(7421):497-501. doi: 10.1038/nature11532 PMID: 23034647
27. Broman KW, Wu H, Sen S, Churchill GA. R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics. 2003; 19(7):889-90. PMID: 12724300
28. Schnable PS, Ware D, Fulton RS, Stein JC, Wei F, Pasternak S, et al. The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science. 2009; 326(5956):1112-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1178534 PMID: 19965430
29. Hill W, Robertson A. Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1968; 38(6):226-31. doi: 10.1007/BF01245622 PMID: 24442307
30. Abecasis GR, Cookson W. GOLD - graphical overview of linkage disequilibrium. Bioinformatics. 2000; 16(2):182-3. PMID: 10842743
31. Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES. TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics. 2007; 23(19):2633-5. PMID: 17586829
32. Dekkers J. Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory. Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie. 2007; 124(6):331-41. PMID: 18076470
33. Lee SH, van der Werf JH, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME, Visscher PM. Predicting unobserved phenotypes for complex traits from whole-genome SNP data. PLoS genetics. 2008; 4(10):e1000231. doi: 10.1371/ journal.pgen.1000231 PMID: 18949033
34. Team RDC R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2012; http://wwwR-projectorg.
35. Habier D, Fernando RL, Garrick DJ. Genomic-BLUP Decoded: A Look into the Black Box of Genomic Prediction. Genetics. 2013.
36. Hill W, Weir B. Variation in actual relationship as a consequence of Mendelian sampling and linkage. 2011.
37. Hayes BJ, Visscher PM, Goddard ME. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genetics Research. 2009; 91(01):47-60.
38. Goddard M. Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica. 2009; 136(2):245-57. doi: 10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0 PMID: 18704696
39. Heffner E, Lorenz A, Jannink J-L, Sorrells M. Plant breeding with genomic selection: gain per unit time and cost. Crop science 2010; 50(5):1681-90.
40. Zhao Y, Gowda M, Liu W, Würschum T, Maurer HP, Longin FH, et al. Accuracy of genomic selection in European maize elite breeding populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2012; 124(4):769-76. doi: 10.1007/s00122-011-1745-y PMID: 22075809
41. Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA. Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach. PloS one. 2008; 3(10):e3395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003395 PMID: 18852893
42. Daetwyler HD, Pong-Wong R, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA. The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods. Genetics. 2010; 185(3):1021-31. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.116855 PMID: 20407128
43. Combs E, Bernardo R. Accuracy of Genomewide Selection for Different Traits with Constant Population Size, Heritability, and Number of Markers. The Plant Genome. 2013; 6(1):1-7.
44. Calus M, Veerkamp R. Accuracy of breeding values when using and ignoring the polygenic effect in genomic breeding value estimation with a marker density of one SNP per cM. Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie. 2007; 124(6):362-8. PMID: 18076473
45. Morrell PL, Buckler ES, Ross-Ibarra J. Crop genomics: advances and applications. Nature reviews Genetics. 2011; 13(2):85-96. Epub 2011/12/31. doi: 10.1038/nrg3097 PMID: 22207165.