Factors associated with adoption of health information technology: A conceptual model based on a systematic review

JMIR Medical Informatics

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Kruse, Clemens Scott ^a   Deshazo, Jonathan ^b   Kim, Forest ^c   Fulton, Lawrence ^a  

^a TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BAYLOR UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adoption; Computerized provider order entry (cpoe); Electronic health record (ehr); Electronic medical record (emr); Health information technology (hit); Medical information systems

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940059207     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22919694     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/medinform.3106     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Health Information Technology for EconomicClinical Health A, 42 U. C. SURL: Http://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/hitech-act-excerpt-from-arra-with-index.pdf [accessed 2014-03-18] [WebCite Cache ID 6OApfh2QK].
2. Elnahal SM, Joynt KE, Bristol SJ, Jha AK. Electronic health record functions differ between best and worst hospitals. Am J Manag Care 2011;17(4):e121-e147 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 21774097].
3. Song PH, McAlearney AS, Robbins J, McCullough JS. Exploring the business case for ambulatory electronic health record system adoption. J Healthc Manag 2011;56(3):169-180; discussion 181. [Medline: 21714372].
4. Institute of Medicine. Key Capabilities of an Electronic Health Record. 2003. URL: Http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2003/Key-Capabilities-of-an-Electronic-Health-Record-System.aspx [accessed 2014-03-20] [WebCite Cache ID 6ODtL6HKG].
5. Hillestad R, Bigelow J, Bower A, Girosi F, Meili R, Scoville R, et al. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;24(5):1103-1117 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1103] [Medline: 16162551].
6. Davis F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989;13(3):319-340. [doi: 10.2307/249008].
7. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 2000;46(2):186-204. [doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926].
8. Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis G, Davis F. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 2003;27(3):425-478. [doi: 10.2307/30036540].
9. Aldrich HE, Pfeffer J. Environments of organizations. Annu Rev Sociol 1976;2(1):79-105. [doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.000455].
10. Pfeffer J, Salancik G. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1978.
11. Scholz CE. Applying Rogers' Theory of Diffusion of Innovations to Examine Older Females' Perceptions of Size Labels For Apparel. Ottawa, Canada: National Library of Canada; 2002.
12. Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovations, 4th Ed. New York, NY: Free Press; 1995.
13. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Free Press; 2003.
14. Pfeffer J, Salancik G. The External Control of Organizations a Resource Dependence Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books; 2003.
15. Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, Hertzog C, Nair SN, Rogers WA, et al. Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychol Aging 2006;21(2):333-352 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333] [Medline: 16768579].
16. Fumasoli T, Lepori B. Patterns of strategies in Swiss higher education institutions. In: High Educ. Netherlands: Springer; 2010:157-178.
17. Henderson J. Health Economics and Policy (with Economic Applications), 2nd ed. Mason, OH: South-Western College Pub; 2012.
18. Sikka V, Luke RD, Ozcan YA. The efficiency of hospital-based clusters: Evaluating system performance using data envelopment analysis. Health Care Manage Rev 2009;34(3):251-261. [doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3181a16ba7] [Medline: 19625830].
19. Bazzoli GJ, Shortell SM, Dubbs N, Chan C, Kralovec P. A taxonomy of health networks and systems: Bringing order out of chaos. Health Serv Res 1999;33(6):1683-1717 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 10029504].
20. Ash JS, Bates DW. Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: Report of a 2004 ACMI discussion. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12(1):8-12 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1684] [Medline: 15492027].
21. Wang BB, Wan TT, Burke DE, Bazzoli GJ, Lin BY. Factors influencing health information system adoption in American hospitals. Health Care Manage Rev 2005;30(1):44-51. [Medline: 15773253].
22. Castillo VH, Martínez-Garciá AI, Pulido JR. A knowledge-based taxonomy of critical factors for adopting electronic health record systems by physicians: A systematic literature review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2010;10:60 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-60] [Medline: 20950458].
23. Blavin FE, Buntin MJ, Friedman CP. Alternative measures of electronic health record adoption among hospitals. Am J Manag Care 2010;16(12 Suppl HIT):e293-e301. [Medline: 21322296].
24. Ginn GO, Shen JJ, Moseley CB. Hospital financial position and the adoption of electronic health records. J Healthc Manag 2011;56(5):337-350; discussion 351. [Medline: 21991681].
25. Farley DE, Hogan C. Case-mix specialization in the market for hospital services. Health Serv Res 1990;25(5):757-783 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 2123838].
26. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. NHE Fact Sheet. 2014. URL: Http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/NHE-Fact-Sheet.html [accessed 2014-03-18] [WebCite Cache ID 6OAbW6btM].
27. Bazzoli GJ, Chan B, Shortell SM, D'Aunno T. The financial performance of hospitals belonging to health networks and systems. Inquiry 2000;37(3):234-252. [Medline: 11111282].
28. DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Vogeli C, Zheng J, Rao SR, Shields AE, et al. Electronic health records' limited successes suggest more targeted uses. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29(4):639-646 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.1086] [Medline: 20368593].
29. Harshberger CA, Harper AJ, Carro GW, Spath WE, Hui WC, Lawton JM, et al. Outcomes of computerized physician order entry in an electronic health record after implementation in an outpatient oncology setting. J Oncol Pract 2011;7(4):233-237 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000261] [Medline: 22043187].
30. Decker SL, Jamoom EW, Sisk JE. Physicians in nonprimary care and small practices and those age 55 and older lag in adopting electronic health record systems. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012;31(5):1108-1114. [doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1121] [Medline: 22535502].
31. Wolf L, Harvell J, Jha AK. Hospitals ineligible for federal meaningful-use incentives have dismally low rates of adoption of electronic health records. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012;31(3):505-513. [doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0351] [Medline: 22392661].
32. Lluch M. Healthcare professionals' organisational barriers to health information technologies-a literature review. Int J Med Inform 2011;80(12):849-862. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.09.005] [Medline: 22000677].
33. Cheung C, Tong E, Cheung N, Chan W, Wang H, Kwan M, et al. Factors associated with adoption of the electronic health record system among primary care physicians. JMIR Med Inform 2013;1(1):e1. [doi: 10.2196/medinform.2766].