Least trade-restrictive SPS policies: An analytic framework is there but questions remain

The Economics of Quarantine and the SPS Agreement

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 183-215

  Orden, David ^a   Narrod, Clare ^b   Glauber, Joseph W ^b  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940036870     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/UPO9781922064325.012     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. Carman, H. and R. Cook (1996) 'An assessment of potential economic impact of Mexican avocado imports on the California industry'. Presented at the ISHS Economic Division Meetings, Rutgers University, August.
2. Evangelou, P, P. Kemere, and C. Miller (1993) Potential economic impacts of an avocado weevil infestation in California. Unpublished paper, USDA/APHIS, Washington, DC, August.
3. Firko, M. J. (1995) Importation of Avocado fruit (Persea americana) from Mexico, supplemental pest risk assessment. BATS/PPQ/APHIS/USDA, Washington, DC, May.
4. Garoyan, L. (1995) Proposed rule for the importation of fresh Hass Avocado fruit grown in Michoacan, Mexico. Report prepared or by the California Avocado Commission by Management Research Associates, Davis, CA, August.
5. Glauber, J. and C. Narrod (2000) 'A rational risk policy for regulating plant diseases and pests'. Draft Paper Presented at the Western Economics Association Annual Meetings, Vancouver, BC, 30 June.
6. Nyrop, J.P. (1995) A critique of the risk management analysis for importation of avocados from Mexico. Report prepared for the Florida Avocado and Lime Committee and presented at the public hearings on the avocado proposed rule, Washington DC, August.
7. Orden, D. and E. Romano (1996) 'The avocado dispute and other technical barriers to agricultural trade under NAFTA'. Invited paper presented at the conference on NAFTA and Agriculture: 'Is the Experiment Working?' San Antonio, TX, November.
8. Podleckis, E.V. and M. J. Firko (1996a) Karnal Bunt: likelihood of spread via conveyances, harvest equipment and wheat shipments. US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Washington, DC, 8 May.
9. Podleckis, E.V. and M. J. Firko (1996b) Karnal Bunt: special risk assessment addendum. US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Washington, DC, 14 May.
10. Podleckis, E.V. and M.J. Firko. (1996c) Karnal Bunt: special risk assessment addendum II. US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Washington, DC, 22 May.
11. Podleckis, E.V. and M.J. Firko (1996d) Karnal Bunt: special risk assessment addendum III. US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Washington, DC, 28 May.
12. Podleckis, E.V. and M.J. Firko (1997) 'Karnal Bunt: likelihood of spread with proposed 1997 program', pp. 229-271 in Bunts and Smuts of Wheat: an International Symposium edited by V.S. Malik and D.E. Mathre. Ottawa: North American Plant Protection Organization.
13. Roberts, D. and D. Orden (1996) 'Determinants of technical barriers to trade: the case of US phytosanitary restrictions on Mexican avocados, 1972-1995', in Understanding technical barriers to agricultural trade, edited by D. Orden and D. Roberts. St. Paul, MN: International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium, Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota.
14. Roberts, D., T. Josling and D. Orden. (1999) A Framework for Analyzing Technical Trade Barriers in Agricultural Markets. Economic Research Service, USDA, Technical Bulletin Number 1876, Washington, DC, March.
15. United States Department of Agriculture (1995) 'Notice of proposed rule on importation of Hass avocados', pp. 34832-34842, Federal Register, 7 CFR Part 319, Docket 94-116-3, Washington, DC, 3 July.
16. United States Department of Agriculture (1997) 'Karnal Bunt regulatory flexibility analysis and regulatory impact analysis', pp. 24753-24765 Federal Register 7 CFR Part 301 Docket 96-016-20, Washington, DC, May 6.
17. World Trade Organization (1995) The Results of the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations: the legal texts, Geneva: WTO Secretariat.