Making the IMF and the world bank more accountable

Reforming the Governance of the IMF and the World Bank

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 149-170

  Woods, Ngaire ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940033749     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/UPO9780857288189.007     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Abugre, Charles and Alexander, Nancy, 1998, Non-governmental organizations and the international, monetary and financial system, International Monetary and Financial Issues for the 1990s Volume IX, Geneva:UNCTAD.
2. Bohman, James, 1999, International regimes and democratic governance: political equality and influence in global institutions, International Affairs, 75:3, pp. 499-513 at pp. 511.
3. Broad, Robin and Cavanagh, J, 1999, The death of the Washington consensus?, World Policy Journal, 16:3, pp. 79-88.
4. Buira, Ariel, 1996, The Governance of the International Monetary Fund, Development and Global Governance, Culpeper, Roy and Pestieau, Caroline (eds), Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, the North-South Institute.
5. Dahl, Robert A, 1999, Can international organizations be democratic?, Democracy's Edges, Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordon, Casiano (eds), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 19-36 at pp. 33.
6. Feldstein, Martin, 1998, Refocusing the IMF, Foreign Affairs, March/April, 77:2, pp. 20-33.
7. Gold, Joseph, 1972, Voting and Decisions in the International Monetary Fund, Washington DC: IMF, pp. 18 and pp. 173-4.
8. Horsefield, Keith J, 1996, The International Monetary Fund, 1945-1965: Twenty Years of International Monetary Cooperation, Washington DC: IMF, Vol. 1.
9. IMF, Articles of Agreement, Article V, Section 1.
10. IMF, 1998a, External Evaluation of the ESAF, Report by a Group of Independent Experts, Washington DC; IMF.
11. IMF, 1998b, The IMF's Response to the Asian Crisis, Washington DC; IMF.
12. IMF, 1999, External Evaluation of IMF Surveillance, Report by a Group of Independent Experts, Washington DC: IMF, p. 34.
13. IMF, 2000a, The IMF in a Changing World, Remarks by Horst Köhler, Managing Director, Given at the National Press Club, Washington, DC, 7 August.
14. IMF, 2000b, Report to the IMFC on the Establishment of the Independent Evaluation Office and its Terms of Reference, Washington DC: IMF, 12 September, www.imf.org/ieo
15. IMF, 2000c, Quota Formula Review Group Report, Washington DC: IMF, 28 April.
16. IMF, 2002, The Modalities of Conditionality-Further Considerations, 8 January, accessed 30 May 2005, pp. 33.
17. Kapur, Devesh, 2001, ‘Expansive Agendas and Weak Instruments: Governance Related Conditionalities of the International Financial Institutions’, Journal of Policy Reform, 4:3.
18. Kapur, Devesh and Webb, Richard, 2000, Governance-related Conditionalities of the International Financial Institutions, Geneva: UNCTAD.
19. Naim, Moises, 2000, Washington consensus or Washington confusion?, Foreign Policy, 118, pp. 86 ff.
20. Schedler, Andreas, Diamond, Larry and Plattner, Marc, 1999, The Self-restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies, Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
21. Scholte, Jan Aart, 1998, The IMF meets Civil Society, Finance and Development, September, 35:3, pp. 42-5.
22. Stiglitz, Joseph, 1998, More instruments and broader goals: moving towards the post-Washington consensus, Helsinki: WIDER/United Nations University.
23. Summers, Lawrence, 1999, The right kind of IMF for a stable global financial system, Remarks to the London Business School, US Treasury: LS-294, 14 December.
24. Wagner, Nancy, 1995, A Review of PPP-Adjusted GDP Estimation and its Potential Use for the Fund's Operational Purposes, IMF Working Paper, Washington DC: IMF.
25. Williamson, John, 1990, Latin American adjustment: how much has happened?, Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.
26. Woods, Ngaire, 2000, The Challenge of Good Governance for the IMF and the World Bank Themselves, World Development, May, 28:5.
27. Woods, Ngaire and Lombardi, Domenico, 2005, Effective Representation and the role of coalitions in the IMF, Global Economic Governance Programme Working Paper, 28 February, at www.globaleconomicgovernance.org
28. World Bank, 1944, Articles of Agreement, Article III, Section 2.
29. World Bank, 1992, Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Board Procedures,Washington DC:World Bank, 26 May.
30. World Bank, 1998, Partnership for Development: From Vision to Action, Washington DC: World Bank.
31. World Bank, 1999, Annual Review of Development Effectiveness, Washington DC: World Bank.
32. World Bank, 2000, China Western Poverty Reduction Project Inspection Panel Report, Washington DC: World Bank, www.worldbank.org/eap/eap.nsf/