The Role of Water in Unconventional in Situ Energy Resource Extraction Technologies

Food, Energy, and Water: The Chemistry Connection

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 183-215

  Gallegos, Tanya J ^a   Bern, Carleton R ^b   Birdwell, Justin E ^b   Haines, Seth S ^b   Engle, Mark ^c  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^b DENVER FEDERAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO   (United States)

Author keywords

Energy resource life cycle; Hydraulic fracturing; In situ oil retorting; In situ recovery; ISR; Unconventional oil and gas production; Uranium

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940020848     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800211-7.00007-7     Document Type: Chapter

References (92)

1. Coleman J. Tight-gas sandstone reservoirs: the 200-year path from unconventional to conventional gas resource and beyond. Unconventional energy resources: making the unconventional conventional: 29th annual GCSSEPM foundation Bob F. Perkins research conference, Houston, Tex., 2009 2009, p. 31. T. Carr, T. D'Agostino, W. Ambrose, J. Pashin, N.C. Rosen (Eds.).
2. Ellsworth W.L. Injection-induced earthquakes. Science 2013, 341(6142).
3. Block L.V., Wood C.K., Yeck W.L., King V.M. The 24 January 2013 ML 4.4 earthquake near Paradox, Colorado, and its relation to deep well injection. Seismol Res Lett 2014, 85(3):609-624.
4. Mudd G.M. The future of yellowcake: a global assessment of uranium resources and mining. Sci Total Environ 2014, 472:590-607.
5. Mantell ME. Deep shale natural gas and water use, part two: abundant, affordable, and still water efficient, water/energy sustainability symposium at the 2010 ground water protection council annual forum 2010, Pittsburgh, PA.
6. Healy RW, Alley WM, Engle MA, McMahon PB, Bales JD. The energy-water nexus: an earth-science perspective, U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1407, in press.
7. Hoekstra A.Y., Chapagain A.K., Aldaya M.M., Mekonnen M.M. The water footprint assessment manual: setting the global standard 2011, p. 228, Earthscan, London; Washington, D.C.
8. Schneider E., Carlsen B., Tavrides E., van der Hoeven C., Phathanapirom U. A top-down assessment of energy, water and land use in uranium mining, milling, and refining. Energy Econ 2013, 40:911-926.
9. Dyni J.R. Geology and resources of some world oil-shale deposits 2006, U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5294, p. 42.
10. Bartis J.T., LaTourrette T., Dixon L., Peterson D.J., Cecchine G. Oil shale development in the United States: prospects and policy issues 2005, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica (CA), p. 68.
11. Birdwell J.E., Mercier T.J., Johnson R.C., Brownfield M.E. In-place oil shale resources examined by grade in the major basins of the Green River Formation, Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming 2013, U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2012-3145, p. 4.
12. Tissot B.P., Welte D.H. Petroleum formation and occurrence 1984, pp. 148-184, Springer, Verlag, Germany.
13. Hanson J.L., Limerick P. What every westerner should know about oil shale: a guide to shale country 2009, University of Colorado at Boulder Center of the American West, Report #10. p. 58.
14. Mercier T.J. Calculation of overburden above the Mahogany zone in the Piceance Basin: U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-69-Y. Oil shale and nahcolite resources of the Piceance Basin, Colorado 2010, R.C. Johnson (Ed.).
15. Terres R., Omari W., Al-Najjar I. Progress in characterizing Jordan's in situ oil shale resource. 32nd Oil Shale Symposium at Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 2013.
16. Minster T., Sladek T. Oil shales potential and prospects in Israel - an update. 32nd Oil Shale Symposium at Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 2013.
17. Ryan R.C., Fowler T.D., Beer G.L., Nair V. Shell's in situ conversion process - from laboratory to field pilots. Oil shale: a solution to the liquid fuel dilemma 2010, 161-184. American Chemical Society, (Washington, D.C.). O.I. Ogunsola (Ed.).
18. Birdwell J.E., Mercier T.J., Johnson R.C., Brownfield M.E., Dietrich J.D. In-place oil shale resources in the saline-mineral and saline-leached intervals, Parachute Creek Member of the Green River Formation, Piceance Basin, Colorado, U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2013-3115 2014, p. 6.
19. Kenny J.F., Barber N.L., Hutson S.S., Linsey K.S., Lovelace J.K., Maupin M.A. Estimated use of water in the United States in 2005 2009, U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1344, p. 52.
20. Gaffigan M., Mittal A. Energy-water nexus: a better and coordinated understanding of water resources could help mitigate the impacts of potential oil shale development: report to Congressional Requesters, GAO-11-35 2010, p. 75.
21. Boak J. A second look at water use for in situ shale oil production. 32nd Oil Shale Symposium at Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 2013.
22. Ryan R.C. Oil shale pyrolysis water treatability study. 29th Oil Shale Symposium at Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 2010.
23. Boak J., Mattson E. Water use for in situ production of oil from oil shale. 29th Oil Shale Symposium at Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 2010.
24. AMEC Energy development water needs assessment phase II - final report prepared for the Colorado River Basin Roundtable and Yampa/White River Basin Roundtable 2012, p. 196.
25. Gleick P.H. Water and energy. Annu Rev Energy Environ 1994, 19:267-299.
26. Shell Frontier Oil and Gas Inc Plan of operation - e-ICP test project 2006, Prepared for the Bureau of Land Management, p. 70.
27. Leenheer J.A., Noyes T.I., Stuber H.A. Determination of polar organic solutes in oil-shale retort water. Environ Sci Technol 1982, 16:714-723.
28. Stephenson M., Dobson K.R., Greenfield P.F., Bell P.R.F. Characterisation of process waters from Fischer assay retorting of Rundle oil shale. Environ Technol Lett 1982, 3:241-246.
29. Hill R., Birdwell J.E., Lewan M.D. Evaluation byproducts of environmental concern in water generated during hydrous pyrolysis of oil shale 2010, Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 2010, p. 340.
30. Johnson R.C., Mercier T.J., Brownfield M.E. Spatial and stratigraphic distribution of water in oil shale of the Green River Formation using Fischer assay, Piceance Basin, Northwestern Colorado 2010, Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 2010, p. 339.
31. Amy G.L., Hines A.L., Thomas J.F., Selleck R.E. Groundwater leaching of organic pollutants from in situ retorted oil shale - a mass transfer analysis. Environ Sci Technol 1980, 14:831-835.
32. Bethea R.M., Barber D.R., Parker H.W., Guven N. Effect of groundwater and pH modification on quality of leachate from simulated in-situ retorted Utah oil shale. Soc Pet Eng J 1983, 23:809-818.
33. Birdwell J.E., Lewan M.D. Leaching of hazardous substances from retorted oil shale during high temperature water flushing 2010, Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Denver, CO, 2010, p. 340.
34. King C.W., Webber M.E. Water intensity of transportation. Environ Sci Technol 2008, 42:7866-7872.
35. Haines S.S., Cook T.A., Thamke J.N., Davis K.W., Long A.J., Healy R.W., et al. A framework for assessing water and proppant use and flowback water extraction associated with development of continuous petroleum resources 2014, U.S. Geological Survey 2014-3010, Available at, [accessed 14.04.14], p. 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/fs20143010.
36. Soeder DJ, Kappel WM. Water resources and natural gas production from the Marcellus Shale. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2009-3032; 2009. Available at: [accessed 14.10.30], p. 6. http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2009/3032/.
37. Airhart M. The Barnett shale gas boom igniting a hunt for unconventional natural gas resources 2007, Geology.com, [accessed 14.04.14]. http://geology.com/research/barnett-shale-gas.shtml.
38. Andrews A., Folger P., Humphries M., Copeland C., Tiemann M., Meltz R., et al. Unconventional gas shales: development, technology, and policy issues 2009, Congressional Research Service, Available at, [accessed 14.04.14], p. 53. https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R40894.pdf.
39. Arthur J.D., Bohm B., Layne M. Hydraulic fracturing considerations for natural gas wells of the Marcellus shale 2008, Ground Water Protection Council Annual Forum, Cincinnati (OH).
40. Clark C.E., Horner R.M., Harto C.B. Life cycle water consumption for shale gas and conventional natural gas. Environ Sci Technol 2013, 47(20):11829-11836.
41. Nicot J.P., Scanlon B.R. Water use for shale-gas production in Texas. US Environ Sci Technol 2012, 46(6):3580-3586.
42. Nicot J.P., Scanlon B.R., Reedy R.C., Costley R.A. Source and fate of hydraulic fracturing water in the Barnett shale: a historical perspective. Environ Sci Technol 2014, 48(4):2464-2471.
43. U.S.Energy Information Administration Annual energy outlook 2013 with projections to 2040. DOE/EIA-0383(2013) 2013, Department of Energy, (Washington, D.C.), Available at, [accessed 14.04.14]. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/archive/aeo13/index.cfm.
44. U.S.Energy Information Administration U.S. crude oil and natural gas proved reserves 2011 2013, Department of Energy, (Washington, D.C.), Available at, [accessed 14.04.14]. http://www.eia.gov/naturalgas/crudeoilreserves/pdf/uscrudeoil.pdf.
45. Belanger L. Fracking our future: measuring water & community impacts from hydraulic fracturing 2012, Western Resource Advocates, Available at, [accessed 14.04.14], p. 27. http://www.westernresourceadvocates.org/frackwater/fracking_our_future_july_2012.pdf.
46. Water sources and demand for the hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas wells in Colorado from 2010 through 2015 2012, Colorado Division of Water Resources and the Colorado Water Conservation Board and the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, Available at, [accessed 14.04.14], p. 9. http://cogcc.state.co.us/Library/Oil_and_Gas_Water_Sources_Fact_Sheet.pdf.
47. Vengosh A., Jackson R.B., Warner N., Darrah T.H., Kondash A. A critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 2014, 48(15):8334-8348.
48. Rivard C., Lavoie D., Lefebvre R., Séjourné S., Lamontagne C., Duchesne M. An overview of Canadian shale gas production and environmental concerns. Int J Coal Geol 2014, 126:64-76.
49. Vidic R.D., Brantley S.L., Vandenbossche J.M., Yoxtheimer D., Abad J.D. Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality. Science 2013, 340(6134).
50. Veil J.A. Water management technologies used by Marcellus shale gas producers. ANL/EVS/R-10/3 2010, prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy and the National Energy Technology Laboratory, (Washington, D.C.), Available at, [accessed 14.04.14], p. 56. http://www.veilenvironmental.com/publications/pw/Water_Mgmt_in_Marcellus-final-jul10.pdf.
51. Maloney K.O., Yoxtheimer D.A. Production and disposal of waste materials from gas and oil extraction from the Marcellus shale play. Pa Environ Pract 2012, 14(04):278-287.
52. Raleigh C.B., Healy J.H., Bredehoeft J.D. An experiment in earthquake control at Rangely, Colorado. Science 1976, 191:1230-1237.
53. Nicholson C., Wesson R.L. Earthquake hazard associated with deep well injection - a report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. US Geol Surv Bull 1990, 1951:74.
54. National Research Council Induced seismicity potential in energy technologies 2013, p. 263, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
55. Horton S. Disposal of hydrofracking waste fluid by injection into subsurface aquifers triggers earthquake swarm in central Arkansas with potential for damaging earthquake. Seismol Res Lett 2012, 83:250-260.
56. NETL Modern shale gas development in the United States: an update (DE-FG26-04NT15455) 2013, U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory Strategic Center for Natural Gas and Oil, (Washington, D.C.), Available at, [accessed 02.05.14]. http://www.netl.doe.gov/File%20Library/Research/Oil-Gas/shale-gas-primer-update-2013.pdf.
57. Osborn S.G., Vengosh A., Warner N.R., Jackson R.B. Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011, 108(20):8172-8176.
58. Jackson R.B., Vengosh A., Darrah T.H., Warner N.R., Down A., Poreda R.J., et al. Increased stray gas abundance in a subset of drinking water wells near Marcellus shale gas extraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2013, 110(28):11250-11255.
59. World Nuclear Association In situ leach (ISL) mining of uranium 2014, [accessed 10.06.14]. http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Nuclear-Fuel-Cycle/Mining-of-Uranium/In-Situ-Leach-Mining-of-Uranium/.
60. McCammon RB. Uranium resources/reserves lecture: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-701 1997, p. 38.
61. Abzalov M.Z. Review: sandstone-hosted uranium deposits amenable for exploitation by in situ leaching technologies. Appl Earth Sci (Trans Inst Min Metall B) 2012, 121(2):55-64.
62. IAEA In situ leaching of uranium: technical, environmental and economic aspects, IAEA-TECDOC-492. Technical committee meeting organized by the International Atomic Energy Agency, International Atomic Energy Association: Vienna, Austria 1989, p. 168.
63. Finch W.I. Uranium-fuel for nuclear energy 2002. US Geol Surv Bull 2003, 2179-A.
64. U.S.Energy Information Administration 2012 domestic uranium production report 2013, Washington, D.C., p. 21.
65. Powertech Inc Dewey-Burdock project Fall River and Custer Counties, South Dakota large scale mine permit application 2012, Prepared for: South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources, p. 505.
66. Mudd G.M. Acid in situ leach uranium mining - 1. USA and Australia. Environ Geol 2001, 41(3-4):390-403.
67. U.S.Environmental Protection Agency Draft technical report: considerations related to post-closure monitoring of uranium in-situ leach/in-situ recovery (ISL/ISR) sites 2011, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., p. 127.
68. Stewart C.L., Reimann L.J., Swapp S.M. Mineralogic considerations for uranium in situ leach mining: a preliminary study of uranium and associated mineralogy of roll-front uranium deposits in Wyoming and Nebraska. Cim Bull 2000, 93(1045):89-96.
69. Way S.-C. Well-field mechanics for in situ recovery of uranium. Southwest Hydrol 2008, 7(6):30-31.
70. Borch T., Roche N., Johnson T.E. Determination of contaminant levels and remediation efficacy in groundwater at a former in situ recovery uranium mine. J Environ Monit 2012, 14(7):1814-1823.
71. U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Environmental impact statement for the Nichols Ranch ISR project in Campbell and Johnson Counties, Wyoming supplement to the generic environmental impact statement for in-situ leach uranium milling facilities: final report 2011, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., p. 749.
72. U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Environmental impact statement for the Moore Ranch ISR project in Campbell county, Wyoming supplement to the generic environmental impact statement for in-situ leach uranium milling facilities: final report 2010, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory, Commission, Washington, D.C., p. 570.
73. Grant D.C. In-situ leaching studies of uranium ores - phase V. 80-9E3-INSIT-R3 1980, Salt Lake City, UT, p. 591.
74. Davis J.A., Curtis G.P. Consideration of geochemical issues in groundwater restoration at uranium in-situ leach mining facilities. NUREG/CR-6870 2007, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Division of Fuel, Engineering, and Radiological Research & U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
75. Montgomery A.H. Adapting uranium in situ mining technology for new commercial applications. In situ leaching of uranium: technical, environmental and economic aspects, IAEA-TECDOC-492 technical committee meeting organized by the International Atomic Energy Agency 1989, 75-96. International Atomic Energy Association, Vienna (Austria). IAEA (Ed.).
76. U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Environmental impact statement for the Lost Creek ISR project in Sweetwater County, Wyoming supplement to the generic environmental impact statement for in-situ leach uranium milling facilities: final report 2011, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., p. 735.
77. U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Environmental impact statement for the Ross ISR project in Crook County, WY: supplement to the generic environmental impact statement for in-situ leach uranium milling facilities. NUREG-1910, Supplement 5 2014, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., p. 805.
78. U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Final environmental impact statement to construct and operate the Crownpoint uranium solution mining project, Crownpoint, NM. NUREG-1508/BLM NM-010-93-02/BIA EIS-92-001 1997, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., p. 452.
79. Uranium Energy Corp Goliad project: draft environmental assessment for a proposed in situ uranium mining facility - license application No. R06064 2011.
80. COGEMA Mining Inc., Petrotek Engineering Corporation Wellfield restoration report: Christensen Ranch Project, Wyoming. Mills, WY 2008, p. 206.
81. U.S.Environmental Protection Agency National primary drinking water regulations. 40 CFR Parts 9, 141, and 142 2000, vol. 65. Fed. Regist.
82. Breit G., Otton J. Produced waters database 2002, U.S. Geological Survey, [accessed 04.04.14]. http://energy.cr.usgs.gov/prov/prodwat/data.htm.
83. Blondes M., Gans K., Thordsen J., Reidy M., Thomas B., Engle M., et al. U.S. Geological Survey national produced waters geochemical database v2.0 2014, [accessed 18.04.14]. http://energy.usgs.gov/EnvironmentalAspects/EnvironmentalAspectsofEnergyProductionandUse/ProducedWaters.aspx#3822349-data.
84. Hu Y., Schmidhalter U. Drought and salinity: a comparison of their effects on mineral nutrition of plants. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 2005, 168(4):541-549.
85. Ayers R., Westcot D. Water quality for agriculture: FAO irrigation and drainage paper no. 29 Rev. 1 1985, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome (Italy).
86. Ayars J., Hoffman G., Corwin D. Leaching and rootzone salinity control. Agricultural salinity assessment and management 2012, 371-403. ASCE, Reston (VA). 2nd ed. W. Wallendar, K. Tanji (Eds.).
87. Sanden B., Ansolabehere D., Le H. Conjunctive use of oilfield produced water for irrigation in the Southern San Joaquin Valley of California - California case study. Produced waters workshop: Colorado Water Institute Information Series No. 102 2006, 81-86. Colorado State University, Fort Collins (CO), Available at, [accessed 02.04.14]. http://www.cwi.colostate.edu/publications/is/102.pdf, R. Wickramasinghe, R. Waskom (Eds.).
88. Zupancic J, Roenbaugh J, Mull G, Nicholson C System and method for dispersing of coal bed sodic water 2008, BeneTerra, LLC, Pratt, Kansas, Patent: 7,320,559.
89. Bern C.R., Breit G.N., Healy R.W., Zupancic J.W. Deep subsurface drip irrigation using coal-bed sodic water: part II. geochemistry. Agric Water Manag 2013, 118:135-149.
90. Santos Ltd Coal seam gas water 2014, [accessed 06.06.14]. http://www.santos.com/coal-seam-gas/coal-seam-gas-water.aspx.
91. Romo CR, Janoe JS. Regulatory regimes for recycling produced and frac flowback water, paper 2012-A-453-AWMA. Air & Waste Management Association, 2012. Available at SSRN: or [accessed 05.05.14], p. 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2124696.
92. Bath C.R. A commentary on Texas water law and policy. Nat Resour J 1999, 39:121-128.