Combining geographic information systems and ethnography to better understand and plan ocean space use

Applied Geography

Volumn 59, Issue , 2015, Pages 70-77

  Sullivan, Colleen M ^a   Conway, Flaxen D L ^a   Pomeroy, Caroline ^b,c   Hall Arber, Madeleine ^d   Wright, Dawn J ^a,e  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^e Environmental Systems Research Inst   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethnography; GIS; Marine spatial planning; Ocean space use; P GIS; Participatory mapping

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939999050     PISSN: 01436228     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.11.027     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Berg B.L., Lune H. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences 2012, Pearson Education, Inc, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. 8th ed.
2. Bonzon K., Fujita R., Black P. Using GIS to elicit and apply local knowledge to ocean conservation. Place matters: Geospatial tools for marine science, conservation, and management in the Pacific Northwest 2005, 205-224. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis. D.J. Wright, A.J. Scholz (Eds.).
3. Conway F., Hall-Arber M., Harte M., Hudgens D., Murray T., Pomeroy C., et al. Identification of outer continental shelf renewable energy space-use conflicts and analysis of potential mitigation measures 2012, 414. Report to BOEM by Industrial Economics Inc. http://tethys.pnnl.gov/publications/identification-outer-continental-shelf-renewable-energy-space-use-conflicts.
4. Conway F., Stevenson J., Hunter D., Stefanovich M., Campbell H., Covell Z., et al. Ocean space, ocean place: the human dimensions of wave energy in Oregon. Oceanography 2010, 23(2):82-91.
5. Ehler C. Conclusions: benefits, lessons learned, and future challenges of marine spatial planning. Marine Policy 2008, 32:840-843.
6. Ehler C., Douvere F. Visions for a sea change 2007, Report of the first international workshop on marine spatial planning. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and man and the biosphere programme, UNESCO, Paris.
7. Gilliland P.M., Laffoley D. Key elements and steps in the process of developing ecosystem-based marine spatial planning. Marine Policy 2008, 32:787-796.
8. Hall-Arber M., Dyer C., Poggie J., McNally J., Gagne R. New England's fishing communities 2001, MIT Sea Grant College Program, Cambridge, MA.
9. Higgs G., Berry R., Kidner D., Langford M. Using IT approaches to promote public participation in renewable energy planning: prospects and challenges. Land Use Policy 2008, 25:596-607.
10. Industrial Economics, Inc. Identification of OCS renewable energy space-use conflicts and analysis of potential mitigation measures 2012, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Herndon, VA.
11. Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force Final recommendations of the Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force 2010, The White House Council on Environmental Quality, Executive Office of the President of the United States, Washington DC.
12. Kliskey A., (Naia) Alessa L., Barr B. Integrating local and traditional ecological knowledge. Ecosystem-based management for the oceans 2009, 145-161. Island Press, Washington, DC. K. McLeod, H. Leslie (Eds.).
13. McGrath K. The feasibility of using zoning to reduce conflicts in the exclusive economic zone. Buffalo Environmental Law Journal 2004, 11:183-213.
14. McLeod K., Leslie H. Why ecosystem-based management?. Ecosystem-based management for the oceans 2009, 3-12. Island Press, Washington DC. K. McLeod, H. Leslie (Eds.).
15. NOAA Coastal Services Center. (2009). Stakeholder engagement strategies for participatory mapping.
16. Package C., Conway F. Long for fishing community profiles: Garibaldi, Newport, and Port Orford 2010, Oregon Sea Grant Publications: ORESU-S-10-001, 002, and 003.
17. Pomeroy R., Douvere F. The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process. Marine Policy 2008, 32:816-822.
18. Pomeroy C., Thomson C., Stevens M. California's north coast fishing communities: Historical perspective and recent trends 2010, (340 pp.). California sea grant technical report T-072, California Sea Grant College, La Jolla, CA.
19. Portman M.E. Involving the public in the impact assessment of offshore renewable energy facilities. Marine Policy 2009, 33(2):332-338.
20. Rosenberg A.A., Mooney-Seus M.L., Kiessling I., Mogensen C.B., Boyle R.O., Peacey J. Lessons from national-level implementation around the world. Ecosystem-based management for the oceans 2009, 294-313. Island Press, Washington, DC. K. McLeod, H. Leslie (Eds.).
21. St Martin K., Hall-Arber M. The missing layer: geo-technologies, communities, and implications for marine spatial planning. Marine Policy 2008, 32:779-786.
22. Sullivan C. Assessment of the potential for conflict between existing ocean space use and renewable energy development off the coast of Oregon 2012, (Masters thesis), Oregon State University. http://tethys.pnnl.gov/publications/assessment-potential-conflict-between-existing-ocean-space-use-and-renewable-energy.
23. U.S.Commission on Ocean Policy An ocean blueprint for the 21st century 2004, Final report.
24. Wedell V., Revell D., Anderson L., Cobb L. Port Orford Ocean Resources Team: partnering local and scientific knowledge with GIS for community-based management in Southern Oregon. Place matters: Geospatial tools for marine science, conservation, and management in the Pacific Northwest 2005, 243-271. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis. D.J. Wright, A.J. Scholz (Eds.).