Landscape ecology, urban morphology, and CBDs: An analysis of the Columbus, Ohio Metropolitan Area

Applied Geography

Volumn 60, Issue , 2015, Pages 301-307

  Lu, Jia ^a  

^a VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

GIS application; Landscape ecology; Quantitative analysis; Urban modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939989850     PISSN: 01436228     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alonso W. Location and land use: Toward a general theory of land rent 1964, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
2. Alperovich G. An empirical study of population density gradients and their determinates. Journal of Regional Science 1983, 23(4):529-540.
3. Bierwagen B. Predicting ecological connectivity in urbanizing landscape. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2005, 32:763-776.
4. Castrejón H., Pérez-Castañeda R., Defeo O. Spatial structure and bathymetric patterns of penaeoid shrimps in the Southwestern Gulf of Mexico. Fisheries Research 2005, 72(2-3):291-300.
5. Cidell J. The role of major infrastructure in subregional economic development: an empirical study of airports and cities. Journal of Economic Geography 2014, 29.
6. Clark C. Urban Population Densities. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1951, 114A:490-496.
7. Conroy EcoCity Columbus: using an Ohio State University planning class to bring sustainability concepts to Columbus, Ohio. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 2004, 5(2):199-212.
8. Cubukcu M., Guldmann J.-M. Geography and the cost of network infrastructure: the case of local telephone systems. The Annals of Regional Science 2008, 42(4):821-842.
9. Geoghegan J., Wainger L.A., Bockstael N.E. Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: an ecological economics analysis using GIS. Ecological Economics 1997, 23:251-264.
10. Gibson R., Pearce S., Morris R., Symondson W., Memmott J. Plant diversity and land use under organic and conventional agriculture: a whole-farm approach. Journal of Applied Ecology 2007, 44:792-803.
11. Gustafson E., Rasmussen J. Assessing the spatial implications of interactions among strategic forest management options using a windows-based harvest simulator. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2002, 33:179-196.
12. Hawbaker T.J., Radeloff V.C., Clayton M.K., Hammer R.B., Gonzales-Abraham C.E. Road development, housing growth, and landscape fragmentation in Northern Wisconsin: 1937-1999. Ecological Applications 2006, 16(3):1222-1237.
13. Holloway S., Bryan D., Chabot R., Rogers D.M., Rulli J. Exploring the Effect of Public Housing on the Concentration of Poverty in Columbus, Ohio. Urban Affair's Review 1998, 33(6):767-789.
14. Lu J., Guldmann J.-M. Population, landscape ecology, and land-use structure: a case study of the Columbus metropolitan area. Landscape and Urban Planning 2012, 105:74-85.
15. Luck M., Wu J. A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: a case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA. Landscape Ecology 2002, 17:327-339.
16. McGarigal K., Cushman S.A., Neel M.C., Ene E. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps 2002, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html.
17. McGlynn I., Okin G. Characterization of shrub distribution using high spatial resolution remote sensing: ecosystem implications for a former Chihuahuan desert grassland. Remote Sensing of Environment 2006, 10:554-566.
18. Mills E.S. An aggregative model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area. The American Economic Review 1967, 57(2):197-210.
19. Mills E.S. Urban density functions. Urban Studies 1970, 7:5-20.
20. Mills E.S. Studies in the structure of the metropolitan economy 1972, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
21. Munroe D., Croissant C., York A. Land use policy and landscape fragmentation in an urbanizing region: assessing the impact of zoning. Applied Geography 2005, 25:121-141.
22. Muth R.F. The spatial structure of the housing market. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association 1961, 7:207-219.
23. Muth R.F. The variation of population density and its components in South Chicago. Papers of the Regional Science Association 1965, 15:173-183.
24. O'Neill, Krummel R.V.J., Gardner R., Sugihara G., Jackson B., DeAngelis D., Milne B., Turner M., Zygmunt B., Christensen S., Dale V., Graham R. Indices of Landscape Pattern. Landscape Ecology 1988, 1(3):153-162.
25. U.S.Geological Survey National land cover data product description 2014, Accessed 01.05.14. http://eros.usgs.gov/products/landcover/nlcd.html.
26. Yang X.J., Liu Z. Quantifying landscape pattern and its change in an estuarine watershed using satellite imagery and landscape metrics. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2005, 26(23):5297-5323.
27. Zeng H., Wu X.B. Utilities of Edge-based Metrics for Studying Landscape Fragmentation. Computers. Environment and Urban Systems 2005, 29:159-178.