Synthetic Mimics of the Extracellular Matrix: How Simple is Complex Enough?

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 489-500

  Kyburz, Kyle A ^a,b   Anseth, Kristi S ^a,b  

^a UCB 450   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Extracellular matrix; Hydrogels; Peptides; Three dimensional culture

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; HYDROGELS; MOBILE SECURITY; PEPTIDES; REPAIR; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE HOMEOSTASIS;

CELL FUNCTIONS; CELLULAR PROCESS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRICES; PATHOPHYSIOLOGICAL; THREE-DIMENSIONAL CULTURE; TISSUE ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS; TISSUE ENGINEERING SCAFFOLD; WOUND REPAIR;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

BIOMIMETIC MATERIAL; HYDROGEL;

EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; PHYSIOLOGY;

BIOMIMETIC MATERIALS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMANS; HYDROGELS;

EID: 84939975608     PISSN: 00906964     EISSN: 15739686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-015-1297-4     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Annabi, N., A. Tamayol, J. A. Uquillas, M. Akbari, L. E. Bertassoni, C. Cha, et al. 25th anniversary article: rational design and applications of hydrogels in regenerative medicine. Adv. Mater. 26:85–124, 2014.
2. Azagarsamy, M. A., and K. S. Anseth. Bioorthogonal click chemistry: an indispensable tool to create multifaceted cell culture scaffolds. ACS Macro Lett. 2:5–9, 2013.
3. Bian, L., M. Guvendiren, R. L. Mauck, and J. A. Burdick. Hydrogels that mimic developmentally relevant matrix and N-cadherin interactions enhance MSC chondrogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110:10117–10122, 2013.
4. Brennan, A. B., C. M. Kirschner, and Society for Biomaterials. Bio-Inspired Materials for Biomedical Engineering. New York: Wiley, 2014.
5. Codelli, J. A., J. M. Baskin, N. J. Agard, and C. R. Bertozzi. Second-generation difluorinated cyclooctynes for copper-free click chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130:11486–11493, 2008.
6. Cosgrove, B. D., P. M. Gilbert, E. Porpiglia, F. Mourkioti, S. P. Lee, S. Y. Corbel, et al. Rejuvenation of the muscle stem cell population restores strength to injured aged muscles. Nat. Med. 20:255–264, 2014.
7. DeForest, C. A., and K. S. Anseth. Cytocompatible click-based hydrogels with dynamically tunable properties through orthogonal photoconjugation and photocleavage reactions. Nat. Chem. 3:925–931, 2011.
8. DeForest, C. A., and K. S. Anseth. Photoreversible patterning of biomolecules within click-based hydrogels. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 51:1816–1819, 2012.
9. DeForest, C. A., B. D. Polizzotti, and K. S. Anseth. Sequential click reactions for synthesizing and patterning three-dimensional cell microenvironments. Nat. Mater. 8:659–664, 2009.
10. DeForest, C. A., E. A. Sims, and K. S. Anseth. Peptide-functionalized click hydrogels with independently tunable mechanics and chemical functionality for 3D cell culture. Chem. Mater. 22:4783–4790, 2010.
11. DeLong, S. A., J. J. Moon, and J. L. West. Covalently immobilized gradients of bFGF on hydrogel scaffolds for directed cell migration. Biomaterials 26:3227–3234, 2005.
12. Dingal, P. C., and D. E. Discher. Combining insoluble and soluble factors to steer stem cell fate. Nat. Mater. 13:532–537, 2014.
13. Engler, A. J., S. Sen, H. L. Sweeney, and D. E. Discher. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126:677–689, 2006.
14. Fairbanks, B. D., M. P. Schwartz, A. E. Halevi, C. R. Nuttelman, C. N. Bowman, and K. S. Anseth. A versatile synthetic extracellular matrix mimic via thiol-norbornene photopolymerization. Adv. Mater. 21:5005, 2009.
15. Faulk, D. M., S. A. Johnson, L. Zhang, and S. F. Badylak. Role of the extracellular matrix in whole organ engineering. J. Cell. Physiol. 229:984–989, 2014.
16. Gandavarapu, N. R., M. A. Azagarsamy, and K. S. Anseth. Photo-click living strategy for controlled, reversible exchange of biochemical ligands. Adv. Mater. 26:2521–2526, 2014.
17. Gilbert, P. M., K. L. Havenstrite, K. E. Magnusson, A. Sacco, N. A. Leonardi, P. Kraft, et al. Substrate elasticity regulates skeletal muscle stem cell self-renewal in culture. Science 329:1078–1081, 2010.
18. Gould, S. T., N. J. Darling, and K. S. Anseth. Small peptide functionalized thiol-ene hydrogels as culture substrates for understanding valvular interstitial cell activation and de novo tissue deposition. Acta Biomater. 8:3201–3209, 2012.
19. Gupta, N., B. F. Lin, L. M. Campos, M. D. Dimitriou, S. T. Hikita, N. D. Treat, et al. A versatile approach to high-throughput microarrays using thiol-ene chemistry. Nat. Chem. 2:138–145, 2010.
20. Hern, D. L., and J. A. Hubbell. Incorporation of adhesion peptides into nonadhesive hydrogels useful for tissue resurfacing. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 39:266–276, 1998.
21. Hiesinger, W., J. R. Frederick, P. Atluri, R. C. McCormick, N. Marotta, J. R. Muenzer, et al. Spliced stromal cell-derived factor-1 alpha analog stimulates endothelial progenitor cell migration and improves cardiac function in a dose-dependent manner after myocardial infarction. J. Thorac. Cardiov. Sur. 140:1174–1180, 2010.
22. Hoyle, C. E., and C. N. Bowman. Thiol-ene click chemistry. Angew. Chem. 49:1540–1573, 2010.
23. Hubbell, J. A. Biomaterials in tissue engineering. Bio-Technology 13:565–576, 1995.
24. Hudalla, G. A., T. S. Eng, and W. L. Murphy. An approach to modulate degradation and mesenchymal stem cell behavior in poly(ethylene glycol) networks. Biomacromolecules 9:842–849, 2008.
25. Humphries, M. J. The molecular-basis and specificity of integrin ligand interactions. J. Cell Sci. 97:585–592, 1990.
26. Jabbari, E. Bioconjugation of hydrogels for tissue engineering. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 22:655–660, 2011.
27. Karp, G. Cell and Molecular Biology: Concepts and Experiments (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley, 2002.
28. Kharkar, P. M., K. L. Kiick, and A. M. Kloxin. Designing degradable hydrogels for orthogonal control of cell microenvironments. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42:7335–7372, 2013.
29. Khetan, S., M. Guvendiren, W. R. Legant, D. M. Cohen, C. S. Chen, and J. A. Burdick. Degradation-mediated cellular traction directs stem cell fate in covalently crosslinked three-dimensional hydrogels. Nat. Mater. 12:458–465, 2013.
30. Kloxin, A. M., K. J. Lewis, C. A. DeForest, G. Seedorf, M. W. Tibbitt, V. Balasubramaniam, et al. Responsive culture platform to examine the influence of microenvironmental geometry on cell function in 3D. Integr. Biol. 4:1540–1549, 2012.
31. Kyburz, K. A., and K. S. Anseth. Three-dimensional hMSC motility within peptide-functionalized PEG-based hydrogels of varying adhesivity and crosslinking density. Acta Biomater. 9:6381–6392, 2013.
32. Lee, S. H., J. J. Moon, J. S. Miller, and J. L. West. Poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels conjugated with a collagenase-sensitive fluorogenic substrate to visualize collagenase activity during three-dimensional cell migration. Biomaterials 28:3163–3170, 2007.
33. Legant, W. R., J. S. Miller, B. L. Blakely, D. M. Cohen, G. M. Genin, and C. S. Chen. Measurement of mechanical tractions exerted by cells in three-dimensional matrices. Nat. Methods 7:969–971, 2010.
34. Leight, J. L., D. L. Alge, A. J. Maier, and K. S. Anseth. Direct measurement of matrix metalloproteinase activity in 3D cellular microenvironments using a fluorogenic peptide substrate. Biomaterials 34:7344–7352, 2013.
35. Leight, J. L., M. A. Wozniak, S. Chen, M. L. Lynch, and C. S. Chen. Matrix rigidity regulates a switch between TGF-beta1-induced apoptosis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Mol. Biol. Cell 23:781–791, 2012.
36. Liang, Y. K., and K. L. Kiick. Heparin-functionalized polymeric biomaterials in tissue engineering and drug delivery applications. Acta Biomater. 10:1588–1600, 2014.
37. Lu, P. F., V. M. Weaver, and Z. Werb. The extracellular matrix: a dynamic niche in cancer progression. J. Cell Biol. 196:395–406, 2012.
38. Lutolf, M. P., J. L. Lauer-Fields, H. G. Schmoekel, A. T. Metters, F. E. Weber, G. B. Fields, et al. Synthetic matrix metalloproteinase-sensitive hydrogels for the conduction of tissue regeneration: engineering cell-invasion characteristics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:5413–5418, 2003.
39. MacArthur, Jr., J. W., B. P. Purcell, Y. Shudo, J. E. Cohen, A. Fairman, A. Trubelja, et al. Sustained release of engineered stromal cell-derived factor 1-alpha from injectable hydrogels effectively recruits endothelial progenitor cells and preserves ventricular function after myocardial infarction. Circulation 128:S79–S86, 2013.
40. Madl, C. M., M. Mehta, G. N. Duda, S. C. Heilshorn, and D. J. Mooney. Presentation of BMP-2 mimicking peptides in 3D hydrogels directs cell fate commitment in osteoblasts and mesenchymal stem cells. Biomacromolecules 15:445–455, 2014.
41. McKinnon, D. D., D. W. Domaille, J. N. Cha, and K. S. Anseth. Bis-aliphatic hydrazone-linked hydrogels form most rapidly at physiological ph: identifying the origin of hydrogel properties with small molecule kinetic studies. Chem. Mater. 26:2382–2387, 2014.
42. McKinnon, D. D., D. W. Domaille, J. N. Cha, and K. S. Anseth. Biophysically defined and cytocompatible covalently adaptable networks as viscoelastic 3D cell culture systems. Adv. Mater. 26:865–872, 2014.
43. Moroni, F., and T. Mirabella. Decellularized matrices for cardiovascular tissue engineering. Am. J. Stem Cells 3:1–20, 2014.
44. Mosiewicz, K. A., L. Kolb, A. J. van der Vlies, M. M. Martino, P. S. Lienemann, J. A. Hubbell, et al. In situ cell manipulation through enzymatic hydrogel photopatterning. Nat. Mater. 12:1072–1078, 2013.
45. Ott, H. C., T. S. Matthiesen, S. K. Goh, L. D. Black, S. M. Kren, T. I. Netoff, et al. Perfusion-decellularized matrix: using nature’s platform to engineer a bioartificial heart. Nat. Med. 14:213–221, 2008.
46. Packard, B. Z., V. V. Artym, A. Komoriya, and K. M. Yamada. Direct visualization of protease activity on cells migrating in three-dimensions. Matrix Biol. 28:3–10, 2009.
47. Patterson, J., and J. A. Hubbell. Enhanced proteolytic degradation of molecularly engineered PEG hydrogels in response to MMP-1 and MMP-2. Biomaterials 31:7836–7845, 2010.
48. Perlin, L., S. MacNeil, and S. Rimmer. Production and performance of biomaterials containing RGD peptides. Soft Matter 4:2331–2349, 2008.
49. Purcell, B. P., D. Lobb, M. B. Charati, S. M. Dorsey, R. J. Wade, K. N. Zellars, et al. Injectable and bioresponsive hydrogels for on-demand matrix metalloproteinase inhibition. Nat. Mater. 13:653–661, 2014.
50. Rabenstein, D. L. Heparin and heparan sulfate: structure and function. Nat. Prod. Rep. 19:312–331, 2002.
51. Schultz, K. M., and K. S. Anseth. Monitoring degradation of matrix metalloproteinases-cleavable PEG hydrogels via multiple particle tracking microrheology. Soft Matter 9:1570–1579, 2013.
52. Schultz, K. M., and E. M. Furst. Microrheology of biomaterial hydrogelators. Soft matter 8:6198–6205, 2012.
53. Tan, J. L., J. Tien, D. M. Pirone, D. S. Gray, K. Bhadriraju, and C. S. Chen. Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: An approach to isolate mechanical force. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:1484–1489, 2003.
54. Tibbitt, M. W., A. M. Kloxin, K. U. Dyamenahalli, and K. S. Anseth. Controlled two-photon photodegradation of PEG hydrogels to study and manipulate subcellular interactions on soft materials. Soft Matter 6:5100–5108, 2010.
55. Wang, H., M. W. Tibbitt, S. J. Langer, L. A. Leinwand, and K. S. Anseth. Hydrogels preserve native phenotypes of valvular fibroblasts through an elasticity-regulated PI3K/AKT pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110:19336–19341, 2013.
56. Watt, F. M., and W. T. S. Huck. Role of the extracellular matrix in regulating stem cell fate. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio 14:467–473, 2013.
57. West, J. L., and J. A. Hubbell. Polymeric biomaterials with degradation sites for proteases involved in cell migration. Macromolecules 32(1):241–244, 1999.
58. Wylie, R. G., S. Ahsan, Y. Aizawa, K. L. Maxwell, C. M. Morshead, and M. S. Shoichet. Spatially controlled simultaneous patterning of multiple growth factors in three-dimensional hydrogels. Nat. Mater. 10:799–806, 2011.
59. Yang, C., M. W. Tibbitt, L. Basta, and K. S. Anseth. Mechanical memory and dosing influence stem cell fate. Nat. Mater 13:645–652, 2014.