User-Driven Development of a Web-Based Tool for Patient Reporting of Drug-Related Harm

Drug Safety

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 359-364

  Plöen, Monica ^a   Wallberg, Magnus ^a   Olsson, Sten ^a  

^a UPPSALA MONITORING CENTRE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER; DRUG LEGISLATION; DRUG SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM; DRUG-RELATED SIDE EFFECTS AND ADVERSE REACTIONS; EUROPEAN UNION; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; INTERNET; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PILOT STUDY; PROCEDURES; SELF REPORT; TIME;

ADVERSE DRUG REACTION REPORTING SYSTEMS; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DRUG-RELATED SIDE EFFECTS AND ADVERSE REACTIONS; EUROPEAN UNION; HUMANS; INTERNATIONALITY; INTERNET; LEGISLATION, DRUG; PHARMACOVIGILANCE; PILOT PROJECTS; SELF REPORT; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84939937814     PISSN: 01145916     EISSN: 11791942     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40264-015-0276-x     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Hazell L, Shakir S. Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2006;29(5):385–96.
2. Banerjee AK, Okun S, Edwards IR, Wicks P, Smith MY, Mayall SJ, Flamion B, Cleeland C, Basch E. Patient-reported outcome measures in safety event reporting: PROSPER consortium guidance. Drug Saf. 2013;36(12):1129–49.
3. Monitoring Medicines. www.monitoringmedicines.org. Accessed 19 Feb 2015.
4. van Hunsel F, Talsma A, van Puijenbroek EP, de Jong-van den Berg L, van Grootheest AC. The proportion of patient reports of suspected ADRs to signal detection in the Netherlands: case–control study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20(3):286–91.
5. Van Hunsel F, Härmark L, Pal S, Olsson S, van Grootheest K. Experiences with adverse drug reaction reporting by patients. An 11-country survey. Drug Safety. 2012;35(1):45–60.
6. Nilsson E. Enhancing public involvement in reporting. Uppsala Reports 52. Uppsala Monitoring Centre; 2011. p. 14.
7. Go-To-Meeting. http://www.gotomeeting.com/online/entry. Accessed 19 Feb 2015.
8. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAPTCHA. Accessed 19 Feb 2015.
9. Plöen M. Workshop on direct patient reporting. Uppsala Reports 57. Uppsala Monitoring Centre; 2012. p. 10–11.
10. Tregunno PM, Fink DB, Fernandez-Fernandez C, Lázaro-Bengoa E, Norén GN. Performance of probabilistic method to detect duplicate individual case safety reports. Drug Safety. 2014;37(4):249–58.
11. Uppsala Monitoring Centre. http://www.who-umc.org. Accessed 19 Feb 2015.