Composition, structure and diversity characterization of dry tropical forest of Chhattisgarh using satellite data

Journal of Forestry Research

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 819-825

  Thakur, Tarun ^a,b   Swamy, S L ^a   Nain, Ajit Singh ^a  

^a INDIRA GANDHI AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b NONE   (India)

Author keywords

forest; land use; NDVI; RS and GIS; Shannon Index; species richness

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939887884     PISSN: 1007662X     EISSN: 19930607     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11676-014-0486-6     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Chaurasia R, Sharma PK. 1999. Land use/Land Cover Mapping and hange Detection using Satellite Data-A Case Study of Dohlon Block, District Ludhiana, Punjab, Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 27(2): 115–121.
2. Cohen WB, Spies TA. 1992. Estimating structural attributes of Douglas-fir/western hemlock forest stand from Landsat and Spot imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 41(1): 1–17.
3. Franklin J. 1986. Thematic Mapper analysis of coniferous structure and composition. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 7(10): 1287–1301.
4. Gautam NC, Narayanan LRA. 1983. Landsat MSS data for land use and land cover inventory and mapping: a case study of Andhra Pradesh. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 11(3): 15–27.
5. Jain SK. 1992. Land use mapping of Tawi catchment using satellite data. Report No. CS-72, National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee, 52p.
6. Jaiswal RK, Saxena R, Mukherjee S. 1999. Application of remote sensing technology for land use/land cover change analysis. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 27(2): 123–128.
7. Jakubauskas ME, Price KP. 1997. Empirical relationships between structural & spectral factors of Yellowstone Lodgepole Pine Forests. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 63(12): 1375–1381.
8. Jayakumar S, Arockiasamy DI, Britto JS. 2000. Estimates of current status of Forest types in Kolli Hill using Remote Sensing. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 28(2–3): 141–151.
9. Jha CS, Goparaju L, Tripathi A, Gharai B, Raghbanshi AS, Singh JS. 2005. Forest fragmentation and its impact on species diversity: An analysis using remote sensing & GIS, Biodiversity and Conservation, 14(7): 1681–1698.
10. Joshi PK, Kumar M, Agrawal D. 2004. Geospatial network analysis for path optimization in solid waste management-A case study of Haridwar (India), International Journal of Remote Sensing, 32(4): 387–392.
11. Kushwaha SPS, Oesten G. 1993. A rule-based system for forest land use planning. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 23(3): 115–124.
12. Margaleaf DR. 1958. Information theory in Ecology. General Systems Bulletin, 3: 36–71.
13. Nath PC, Arunachalam A, Khan ML, Arunachalam K, Barbhuiya AR. 2005. Vegetation analysis and tree population structure of tropical wet evergreen forests in and around Namdapha National Park, Northeast India, Biodiversity and Conservation, 14(9): 2109–2135.
14. Palaniyandi M, Nagarathinam V. 1997. Land use/ land cover mapping and change detection using space borne data. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 25(1): 27–33.
15. Pandey VK, Panda SN, Raghuwanshi NS, Sudhakar S. 2006. Delineation and parameterization of Banikdih watershed using Remote Sensing & AVSWAT model. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34(2): 143–152.
16. Pascal 1992. Evergreen forest of the Western Ghats structural and functional trends. In: K.P. Singh and J.S. Singh (eds), Tropical Ecosystems, Ecology and Management. New Delhi: Wiley Limited, pp 385–408.
17. Pielou EC. 1966. Species diversity and pattern diversity in the study of ecological succession. Journal Theoretical Biology, 10(8): 370–383.
18. Prasad R, Pandey RK. 1992. An observation on plant diversity of Sal and Teak forest in relation to intensity of biotic impact of various distances from habitation in Madhya Pradesh: A case study. Journal of Tropical Forestry, 8(1): 62–83.
19. Rathore DS. 1996. Hydrological land use mapping of Narmada basin, Report No. CS (AP) — 222, National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee, 45p.
20. Ravan SA. 1994. Ecological analysis of vegetation from satellite remote sensing at Madhav National Park Sivapuri (M.P.). Ph.D. Thesis, HNB Garhwal University, Srinagar, India.
21. Ravan SA, Roy PS, Sharma CM. 1996. Accuracy evaluation of digital classification of Landsat TM data — An approach to include phenological stages of tropical dry deciduous forest. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 22(1): 33–43.
22. Roy PS, Ravan SA. 1996. Biomass estimation using satellite remote sensing data-An investigation on possible approaches for natural forest. Journal of Bioscience, 21(4): 535–561.
23. Saxena KG, Tiwari AK, Porwal MC, Menon APR. 1992. Vegetation mapping needs and scope of digital processing of Landsat Thematic Mapper data in tropical region of South-West India. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 13(11): 2017–2037.
24. Sehgal VK, Dubey RP. 1997. Evaluation of potential usefulness of IRS-1C WIFS simulated data for dryland rabi sorghum crop discrimination. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 25(3): 137–143.
25. Shannon CE, Weaver W. 1963. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
26. Sharma KP, Jain SC, Garg PK. 1984. Monitoring land use and land cover change using Landsat images. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 12(2): 65–70.
27. Simpson EH. 1949. Measurement of Diversity. Nature, 163: 688.
28. Singh IJ, Jugran DK, Thanruma S, Reddy SR. 2005. Forest resource assessment in Mohand Forest Range, Uttar Pradesh using remote sensing & GIS. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 33(4): 565–574.
29. Singh L, Singh JS. 1991. Species structure, dry matter dynamics and carbon flux of a dry tropical forest in India. Annals of Botany, 68: 263–273.
30. Soil Survey Staff. 1960. Soil classification: A comprehensive system-7th Approximation. Washington, DC: Soil Conservation Services, United State Department of Agriculture. US Government Printing Office.
31. Spanner MA, Pierce IL, Peterson DL, Running SW. 1990. Remote sensing of temperate coniferous forest leaf area index. The influence of canopy closer understorey vegetation background reflectance. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 11(1): 95–111.
32. Stoms DM, Estes JE. 1993. A remote sensing research agenda for mapping & monitoring biodiversity. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 14: 1839–1860.
33. Sudhakar S, Das RK, Chakraborty D, Bardhan Roy BK, Raha AK, Shukla P. 1994. Stratification approach for forest cover type and landuse mapping using IRS-1A LISS-II data — A case study. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 22(1): 21–29.
34. Sudhakar S, Sridevi G, Raman IV, Rao VV. 1999. Techniques of classification for land use/land cover with special reference to forest type mapping in Jaldapara wild life sanctuary, Jalpaiguni district, West Bengal-A case study. Journal Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 27(4): 217–224.
35. Swamy SL. 1998. Estimation of Net Primary Productivity (NPP) in an Indian tropical evergreen forest using Remote Sensing data. Ph.D. Thesis, Jawaharlal Nehru Technology University, Hyderabad.
36. Townshend JRG, Justice CO, Kalb V. 1987. Characterization and classification of South American land cover types using Satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 8: 1189–1207.
37. Tucker CJ, Townshend JRG, Goff TE. 1985. African Land Cover Classification Using Satellite Data. Science, 227: 369–375.
38. Tuomisto H, Linna A, Kalliola R. 1994. Use of digitally processed satellite images in studies of tropical rain forest vegetation. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 15(8): 1595–1618.
39. Turner MG, Pearson SM, Bolstad P, Wear DN. 2003. Effects of land-cover changes on spatial pattern of forest communities in the Southern Appalachian Mountains (USA), Landscape Ecology, 18(5): 449–465.
40. Varghese AO, Menon ARR. 1998. Vegetation characteristics of southern secondary moist mixed deciduous forests of Agasthyamalai region of Kerala. Indian Journal of Forestry, 21(4):639–644.
41. Whittaker RH. 1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon, 21: 213–251.