Disaster risk assessment of ports based on the perspective of vulnerability

Natural Hazards

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 851-864

  Hsieh, Cheng Hsien ^a  

^a CHIHLEE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Disaster risk assessment; Geographic information system (GIS); Hazard map; Port vulnerability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939883254     PISSN: 0921030X     EISSN: 15730840     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-014-1214-4     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Athanasatos S, Michaelides S, Papadakis M (2014) Identification of weather trends for use as a component of risk management for port operations. Nat Hazards 72:41–61
2. Barlas Y, Yasarcan H (2006) Goal setting, evaluation, learning and revision: a dynamic modeling approach. Eval Program Plan 29:79–87
3. Berle Ø, Asbjørnslet BE, Rice JB (2011) Formal vulnerability assessment of a maritime transportation system. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96:696–705
4. Bollin C, Hidajat R (2006) Community-based disaster risk index: pilot implementation in Indonesia. In: Birkmann J (ed) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards—towards disaster resilient societies. United Nations University, New York, pp 271–289
5. Chan SL, Huang SL, Wang SH (2003) On the risk zoning of flood hazard in Taipei areas. J City Plan 30:263–280 (in Chinese)
6. Chang YT, Lee SY, Tongzon JL (2008) Port selection factors by shipping lines: different perspectives between trunk liners and feeder service providers. Mar Policy 32:877–885
7. Chen BY, Lam WHK, Sumalee A, Li Q, Li ZC (2012) Vulnerability analysis for large-scale and congested road networks with demand uncertainty. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 46:501–516
8. Chen CW, Lee CC, Tseng CP, Chen CH (2013) Application of GIS for the determination of hazard hotspots after direct transportation linkages between Taiwan and China. Nat Hazards 66:191–228
9. Cox A, Prager F, Rose A (2011) Transportation security and the role of resilience: a foundation for operational metrics. Transp Policy 18:307–317
10. de Andrade MMN, Szlafsztein CF, Souza-Filho PWM, Araújo ADR, Gomes MKT (2010) A socioeconomic and natural vulnerability index for oil spills in an Amazonian harbor: a case study using GIS and remote sensing. J Environ Manag 91:1972–1980
11. Fedeski M, Gwilliam J (2007) Urban sustainability in the presence of flood and geological hazards: the development of a GIS-based vulnerability and risk assessment methodology. Landsc Urban Plan 83:50–61
12. Feng CM, Hsieh CH (2009) Implications of transport diversity for quality of life. J Urban Plan Dev 135:13–18
13. Fleming DK, Baird AJ (1999) Comment: some reflections on port competition in the United States and Western Europe. Marit Policy Manag 26:383–394
14. Foggin JH, Dicer GN (1985) Disappearing hinterlands: the impact of the logistics concept on port competition. Proc Transp Res Forum 26:385–391
15. Franc P, van der Horst M (2010) Understanding hinterland service integration by shipping lines and terminal operators: a theoretical and empirical analysis. J Transp Geogr 18:557–566
16. Fung KF (2001) Competition between the ports of Hong Kong and Singapore: a structural vector error correction model to forecast the demand for container handling services. Marit Policy Manag 28:3–22
17. GTZ (2004) Guidelines: risk analysis—a basis for disaster risk management. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit, Eschborn
18. Hamilton AJ (2005) Species diversity or biodiversity? J Environ Manag 75:89–92
19. Heaver TD, Meersman H, van de Voorde E (2001) Co-operation and competition in international container transport: strategies for ports. Marit Policy Manag 28:293–305
20. Hsieh CH, Feng CM (2014) Road network vulnerability assessment based on fragile factor interdependencies in spatial-functional perspectives. Environ Plan A 46:700–714
21. Hsieh CH, Tai HH, Lee YN (2013) Port vulnerability assessment from the perspective of critical infrastructure interdependency. Marit Policy Manag. doi:10.1080/03088839.2013.856523
22. Lam JSL, Dai J (2012) A decision support system for port selection. Transp Plan Technol 35:509–524
23. Lee HS, Chou MT, Kuo SG (2005) Evaluating port efficiency in Asia Pacific region with recursive data envelopment analysis. J East Asia Soc Transp Stud 6:544–599
24. Lei Y, Wang J, Yue Y, Zhou H, Yin W (2014) Rethinking the relationships of vulnerability, resilience, and adaptation from a disaster risk perspective. Nat Hazards 70:609–627
25. Lin Y, Lee T (2012) Assessment of vulnerability and risk of Taijiang coastal areas to climatic changes. Int J Environ Earth Sci Eng 6:20–28
26. Lindley SJ, Handley JF, Theuray N, Peet E, McEvoy D (2006) Adaptation strategies for climate change in the urban environment: assessing climate change related risk in UK urban areas. J Risk Res 9:543–568
27. Lindley SJ, Handley JF, McEvoy D, Peet E, Theuray N (2007) The role of spatial risk assessment in the context of planning for adaptation in UK urban areas. J Built Environ 33:46–69
28. Lirn TC, Thanopoulou HA, Beynon MJ, Beresford AKC (2004) An application of AHP on transhipment port selection: a global perspective. Marit Econ Logist 6:70–91
29. Loo BPY, Chow SY (2006) Sustainable urban transportation: concepts, policies, and methodologies. J Urban Plann Dev 132:76–79
30. Miller-Hooks E, Zhang X, Faturechi R (2012) Measuring and maximizing resilience of freight transportation networks. Comput Oper Res 39:1633–1643
31. Muller F (1998) Gradients in ecological systems. Ecol Model 108:3–21
32. Müller M, Vorogushyn S, Maier P, Thieken AH, Petrow T, Kron A, Büchele B, Wächter J (2006) CEDIM risk explorer—a map server solution in the project ‘Risk Map Germany’. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6:711–720
33. National Science and Technology Center for Disaster Reduction (2013) 2013 hazard potential maps, NCDR Disaster Prone Website. http://satis.ncdr.nat.gov.tw/Dmap/102Catalog.aspx. Accessed 16 June 2013
34. Nir AS, Lin K, Liang GS (2003) Port choice behavior—from the perspective of the shipping. Marit Policy Manag 30:165–173
35. Odum EP (1993) Ecology and our endangered life-support system. Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts
36. Park RK, De P (2004) An alternative approach to efficiency measurement of seaports. Marit Econ Logist 6:53–69
37. Reeves D (2005) Planning for diversity: policy and planning in a world of difference. Routledge, Oxon
38. Remondo J, Bonachea J, Cendrero A (2008) Quantitative landslide risk assessment and mapping on the basis of recent occurrences. Geomorphol 94:496–507
39. Song DW, Yeo KT (2004) A competitive analysis of Chinese container ports using the analytic hierarchy process. Marit Econ Logist 6:34–52
40. Steg L, Gifford R (2005) Sustainable transportation and quality of life. J Transp Geogr 13:59–69
41. Tongzon J, Wu H (2005) Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals). Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 39:405–424
42. UNCTAD (2009) Review of maritime transport. United Nations Publication, Geneva
43. UNISDR (2004) Living with risk: a global review of disaster reduction initiatives. United Nations Publication, Geneva
44. UNISDR (2005) Hyogo declaration. United Nations Publication, Geneva
45. UNISDR (2009) Terminology on disaster risk reduction. http://www.unisdr.org/files/7817_UNISDRTerminology-English.pdf
46. Wang XD, Zhong XH, Liu SZ, Liu JG, Wang ZY, Li MH (2008) Regional assessment of environmental vulnerability in the Tibetan Plateau: development and application of a new method. J Arid Environ 72:1929–1939
47. WEF (2010) Global risks 2010: a global risk network report. World Economic Forum, Geneva
48. World Bank (2005) Natural disaster hotspots: a global risk analysis. World Bank, Washington DC
49. Yakubu A (2010) Path coefficient and path analysis of body weight and biometric traits in Yankasa lambs. Slovak J Anim Sci 43:17–25
50. Yuen CA, Zhang A, Cheung W (2012) Port competitiveness from the users’ perspective: an analysis of major container ports in China and its neighboring countries. Res Transp Econ 35:34–40