Nanomagnetic activation as a way to control the efficacy of nucleic acid delivery

Pharmaceutical Research

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 103-121

  Grzes̈kowiak, Bartosz F ^a,b,c   Sánchez Antequera, Yolanda ^a   Hammerschmid, Edelburga ^a   Döblinger, Markus ^d   Eberbeck, Dietmar ^e   Woźniak, Anna ^b   Słomski, Ryszard ^b,c   Plank, Christian ^a   Mykhaylyk, Olga ^a,f  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^c POZNA UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Poland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^e PHYSIKALISCH TECHNISCHE BUNDESANSTALT   (Germany)

^f TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

magnetic cell labeling; magnetic nanoassemblies; magnetic nanoparticles; nanomagnetic activation; nucleic acid delivery

Indexed keywords

DNA; DRUG CARRIER; MAGNETITE NANOPARTICLE;

ANIMAL; CELL CULTURE; CHEMISTRY; FIBROBLAST; GENETIC TRANSFECTION; GENETICS; MAGNETIC FIELD; METABOLISM; MOUSE; PIG; PLASMID; PRIMARY CELL CULTURE; PROCEDURES; STAINING; SURFACE PROPERTY; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

ANIMALS; CELLS, CULTURED; DNA; DRUG CARRIERS; FIBROBLASTS; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETITE NANOPARTICLES; MICE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, TRANSMISSION; PLASMIDS; PRIMARY CELL CULTURE; STAINING AND LABELING; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SWINE; TRANSFECTION;

EID: 84939882241     PISSN: 07248741     EISSN: 1573904X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-014-1448-6     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Takahashiand K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006;126:663-76.
2. Fujimura T, Takahagi Y, Shigehisa T, Nagashima H, Miyagawa S, Shirakura R, et al. Production of alpha 1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-deficient pigs by somatic cell nuclear transfer: a novel selection method for gal alpha 1,3-Gal antigen-deficient cells. Mol Reprod Dev. 2008;75:1372-8.
3. Greschand O, Altrogge L. Transfection of difficult-to-transfect primary mammalian cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;801:65-74.
4. Rogers CS, Hao Y, Rokhlina T, Samuel M, Stoltz DA, Li Y, et al. Production of CFTR-null and CFTR-DeltaF508 heterozygous pigs by adeno-associated virus-mediated gene targeting and somatic cell nuclear transfer. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:1571-7.
5. Wang W, Li W, Ma N, Steinhoff G. Non-viral gene delivery methods. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2013;14:46-60.
6. Nakayama A, Sato M, Shinohara M, Matsubara S, Yokomine T, Akasaka E, et al. Efficient transfection of primarily cultured porcine embryonic fibroblasts using the amaxa nucleofection system. Cloning Stem Cells. 2007;9:523-34.
7. Ross JW, Whyte JJ, Zhao J, Samuel M, Wells KD, Prather RS. Optimization of square-wave electroporation for transfection of porcine fetal fibroblasts. Transgenic Res. 2010;19:611-20.
8. Fourikiand A, Dobson J. Nanomagnetic gene transfection for non-viral gene delivery in NIH 3T3 mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Materials. 2013;6:255-64.
9. Adler AF, Grigsby CL, Kulangara K, Wang H, Yasuda R, Leong KW. Nonviral direct conversion of primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts to neuronal cells. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2012;1:e32.
10. Plank C, Zelphati O, Mykhaylyk O. Magnetically enhanced nucleic acid delivery. Ten years of magnetofection-progress and prospects. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011;63:1300-31.
11. Cui J, Cui H, Wang Y, Sun C, Li K, Ren H, et al. Application of PEI-modified magnetic nanoparticles as gene transfer vector for the genetic modification of animals. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2012;2012:1-6.
12. Lee CH, Kim JH, Lee HJ, Jeon K, Lim H, Choi H, et al. The generation of iPS cells using non-viral magnetic nanoparticle based transfection. Biomaterials. 2011;32:6683-91.
13. Mykhaylyk O, Steingotter A, Perea H, Aigner J, Botnar R, Plank C. Nucleic acid delivery to magnetically-labeled cells in a 2D array and at the luminal surface of cell culture tube and their detection by MRI. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2009;5:692-706.
14. Sanchez-Antequera Y, Mykhaylyk O, van Til NP, Cengizeroglu A, de Jong JH, Huston MW, et al. Magselectofection: an integrated method of nanomagnetic separation and genetic modification of target cells. Blood. 2011;117:e171-181.
15. Chorny M, Fishbein I, Tengood JE, Adamo RF, Alferiev IS, Levy RJ. Site-specific gene delivery to stented arteries using magnetically guided zinc oleate-based nanoparticles loaded with adenoviral vectors. FASEB J. 2013;27:2198-206.
16. Mykhaylyk O, Antequera YS, Vlaskou D, Plank C. Generation of magnetic nonviral gene transfer agents and magnetofection in vitro. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:2391-411.
17. Mykhaylyk O, Sobisch T, Almstatter I, Sanchez-Antequera Y, Brandt S, Anton M, et al. Silica-iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles modified for gene delivery: a search for optimum and quantitative criteria. Pharm Res. 2012;29:1344-65.
18. Sanchez-Antequera Y, Mykhaylyk O, Thalhammer S, Plank C. Gene delivery to jurkat T cells using non-viral vectors associated with magnetic nanoparticles. Int J Biomed Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2010;1:202-29.
19. Torranceand JD, Bothwell TH. Tissue iron stores. In: JD C, editor. Methods in hematology: iron. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1981. p. 90-115.
20. Mykhaylyk O, Zelphati O, Rosenecker J, Plank C. siRNA delivery by magnetofection. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2008;10:493-505.
21. Wilhelm C, Gazeau F, Bacri JC. Magnetophoresis and ferromagnetic resonance of magnetically labeled cells. Eur Biophys J Biophys Lett. 2002;31:118-25.
22. Tresilwised N, Pithayanukul P, Holm PS, Schillinger U, Plank C, Mykhaylyk O. Effects of nanoparticle coatings on the activity of oncolytic adenovirus-magnetic nanoparticle complexes. Biomaterials. 2012;33:256-69.
23. Dickens S, Van den Berge S, Hendrickx B, Verdonck K, Luttun A, Vranckx JJ. Nonviral transfection strategies for keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and endothelial progenitor cells for ex vivo gene transfer to skin wounds. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2010;16:1601-8.
24. Maurisse R, De Semir D, Emamekhoo H, Bedayat B, Abdolmohammadi A, Parsi H, et al. Comparative transfection of DNA into primary and transformed mammalian cells from different lineages. BMC Biotechnol. 2010;10:9.
25. Richter A, Kurome M, Kessler B, Zakhartchenko V, Klymiuk N, Nagashima H, et al. Potential of primary kidney cells for somatic cell nuclear transfer mediated transgenesis in pig. BMC Biotechnol. 2012;12:84.
26. Arbaband AS, Frank JA. Cellular MRI and its role in stem cell therapy. Regen Med. 2008;3:199-215.
27. Polyak B, Fishbein I, Chorny M, Alferiev I, Williams D, Yellen B, et al. High field gradient targeting of magnetic nanoparticle-loaded endothelial cells to the surfaces of steel stents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:698-703.
28. Kempeand H, Kempe M. The use of magnetite nanoparticles for implant-assisted magnetic drug targeting in thrombolytic therapy. Biomaterials. 2010;31:9499-510.
29. Santiniand F, Keen JH. Endocytosis of activated receptors and clathrin-coated pit formation: deciphering the chicken or egg relationship. J Cell Biol. 1996;132:1025-36.
30. Santini F, Marks MS, Keen JH. Endocytic clathrin-coated pit formation is independent of receptor internalization signal levels. Mol Biol Cell. 1998;9:1177-94.
31. Bildirici L, Smith P, Tzavelas C, Horefti E, Rickwood D. Biotechniques: transfection of cells by immunoporation. Nature. 2000;405:298.
32. Tzavelas C, Bildirici L, Rickwood D. Production of stably transfected cell lines using immunoporation. Biotechniques. 2004;37:276-+.
33. Mannix RJ, Kumar S, Cassiola F, Montoya-Zavala M, Feinstein E, Prentiss M, et al. Nanomagnetic actuation of receptor-mediated signal transduction. Nat Nanotechnol. 2008;3:36-40.
34. Lee JH, Kim ES, Cho MH, Son M, Yeon SI, Shin JS, et al. Artificial control of cell signaling and growth by magnetic nanoparticles. Angew Chem-Int Ed. 2010;49:5698-702.
35. Hughes S, McBain S, Dobson J, El Haj AJ. Selective activation of mechanosensitive ion channels using magnetic particles. J R Soc Interface. 2008;5:855-63.
36. Hu B, Haj AJ, Dobson J. Receptor-targeted, magneto-mechanical stimulation of osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:19276-93.
37. Dobson J. Remote control of cellular behaviour with magnetic nanoparticles. Nat Nano. 2008;3:139-43.
38. Luzio JP, Bright NA, Pryor PR. The role of calcium and other ions in sorting and delivery in the late endocytic pathway. Biochem Soc Trans. 2007;35:1088-91.
39. Hoffmann C, Mazari E, Lallet S, Le Borgne R, Marchi V, Gosse C, et al. Spatiotemporal control of microtubule nucleation and assembly using magnetic nanoparticles. Nat Nanotechnol. 2013;8:199-205.
40. Dejardin T, de la Fuente J, del Pino P, Furlani EP, Mullin M, Smith CA, et al. Influence of both a static magnetic field and penetratin on magnetic nanoparticle delivery into fibroblasts. Nanomedicine. 2011;6:1719-31.