Visualizing the structure and bridges of the intellectual property management and strategy literature: a document co-citation analysis

Scientometrics

Volumn 101, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 623-661

  Appio, Francesco Paolo ^a   Cesaroni, Fabrizio ^b,c   Di Minin, Alberto ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^b DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION   (Spain)

^c SCUOLA SUPERIORE SANT ANNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cluster analysis; DCA; Diversity analysis; Document co citation analysis; Intellectual property; IP management; IP strategy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939873800     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1329-0     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Acedo, F. J., & Casillas, J. C. (2005). Current paradigms in the international management field: An author co-citation analysis. International Business Review,14(5), 619–639.
2. Adams, J. E., & McCune, E. D. (1979). Application of the generalized jack-knife to Shannon’s measure of information used as an index of diversity. In J. F. Grassle, G. P. Patil, W. Smith, & C. Taille (Eds.), Ecological diversity in theory and practice (p. 117). Fairland, MD: International Co-operative Publishing House.
3. Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Gambardella, A. (2001). Markets for technology. NY: MIT Press.
4. Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity (pp. 609–625). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,17(1), 99–120.
6. Bercovitz, J. E. L., & Feldman, M. P. (2007). Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances. Research Policy,36(7), 930–948.
7. Bowman, K. O., Hutchenson, K., Odum, E. P., & Shenton, L. R. (1971). Comments on the distribution of indices of diversity. In G. P. Patil, E. C. Pielou, & W. E. Waters (Eds.), Statistical ecology (pp. 315–359). London: Pennsylvanian State University Press.
8. Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy,29(4/5), 627–655.
9. Cesaroni, F., & Piccaluga, A. (2013). Operational challenges and ST’s proposed solutions to improve collaboration between IP and R&D in innovation processes. California Management Review,55(4), 143–156.
10. Chen, C., Cribbin, T., Macredie, R., & Morar, S. (2002). Visualizing and tracking the growth of competing paradigms: Two case studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,53(8), 678–689.
11. Chen, C., Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., & Hou, J. (2010). The structure and dynamics of co-citation clusters: a multiple-perspective co-citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,61(7), 1386–1409.
12. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly,35(1), 128–152.
13. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2000). Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper 7522.
14. Coombes, P. H., & Nicholson, J. D. (2013). Business models and their relationship with marketing: A systematic literature review. Industrial Marketing Management,42(5), 656–664.
15. Daniels, J. D. (1991). Relevance in international business research: A need for more linkages. Journal of International Business Studies,22(2), 177–186.
16. David, R. J., & Han, S. K. (2004). A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics. Strategic Management Journal,25(1), 39–58.
17. Davis, J. L., & Harrison, S. S. (2001). Edison in the boardroom: How leading companies realize value from their intellectual assets. New York: Wiley.
18. Di Guardo, M. C., & Harrigan, K. R. (2011). Mapping research on strategic alliances and innovation: A co-citation analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer,37(6), 789–811.
19. Di Minin, A., & Faems, D. (2013). Building appropriation advantage: An introduction to the special issue on intellectual property management. California Management Review,55(4), 7–14.
20. Di Stefano, G., Peteraf, M., & Verona, G. (2010). Dynamic capabilities deconstructed: A bibliographic investigation into the origins, development, and future directions of the research domain. Industrial and Corporate Change,19(4), 1187–1204.
21. DuBois, F. L., & Reeb, D. (2000). Ranking the international business journals. Journal of International Business Studies,31(4), 689–704.
22. Eom, S.B. (2004). Author cocitation analysis using custom bibliographic databases: An exploratory tool for digging up reference disciplines. ECIS 2004 Proceedings. Paper 31.
23. Ernst, H., Legler, S., & Lichtenthaler, U. (2010). Determinants of patent value: Insights from a simulation analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,77(1), 1–19.
24. Fleck, L. (1935). The genesis and development of a scientific fact. (trans. 1979), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Orig. in German).
25. Gans, J. S., Hsu, D. H., & Stern, S. (2002). When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction? RAND Journal of Economics,33(4), 571–586.
26. Gans, J. S., Hsu, D. H., & Stern, S. (2008). The impact of uncertain intellectual property rights on the market for ideas: Evidence from patent grant delays. Management Science,54(5), 982–997.
27. Gans, J. S., & Stern, S. (2003). The product market and the market for “ideas”: Commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Research Policy,32(2), 333–350.
28. Garfield, E. (1980). Is information retrieval in the arts and humanities inherently different from that in science?: The effect that ISI’s citation index for the arts and humanities is expected to have on future scholarship. Library quarterly,50(1), 40–57.
29. Granstrand, O. (2000). The economics and management of intellectual property. Edward Elgar.
30. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature,28, 1661–1707.
31. Grindley, P. C., & Teece, D. J. (1997). Managing intellectual capital: Licensing and cross-licensing in semiconductors and electronics. California Management Review,39(2), 8–41.
32. Hall, B. H., & Ziedonis, R. H. (2001). The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. RAND Journal of Economics,32(1), 101–128.
33. Hanel, P. (2006). Intellectual property rights and business management practices: A survey of the literature. Technovation,26(8), 895–931.
34. Harabi, N. (1995). Appropriability of technical innovations: An empirical analysis. Research Policy,24(6), 981–992.
35. Harvey, C., Kelly, A., Morris, H., & Rowlinson, M. (Eds.). (2010). Academic journal quality guide, version 4. London: The Associations of Business Schools.
36. Heller, M. A., & Eisenberg, R. S. (1998). Can patents deter innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research. Science,280(5364), 698–701.
37. Heltshe, J. F., & Bitz, D. W. (1979). Comparing diversity measures in sampled communities. In F. Grassle, G. P. Patil, W. Smith, & C. Taille (Eds.), Ecological diversity in theory and practice (pp. 133–144). Fairland, MD: International Co-operative Publishing House.
38. Henderson, R., & Cockburn, I. (1994). Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal,15, 63–84.
39. Hill, M. O. (1973). Diversity and evenness: A unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology,54(2), 427–432.
40. Hutcheson, K. (1970). A test for comparing diversities based on the Shannon formula. Journal of Theoretical Biology,29, 151–154.
41. Idris, K. (2003). Intellectual property: a power tool for economic growth. Technical Report Publication N. 888, ISBN 92-805-1113-0, WIPO, Geneva.
42. Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. (2001). Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions. American Economic Review,91(1), 240–259.
43. Junge, K. (1994). Diversity of ideas about diversity measurement. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,35(1), 16–26.
44. Junghans, C., & Levy, A. (2006). Intellectual property management: A guide for scientists, engineers, financiers, and managers. Weinheim: Wiley.
45. Kenney, M., & Patton, D. (2009). Reconsidering the Bayh–Dole Act and the current university invention ownership model. Research Policy,38(9), 1407–1422.
46. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
47. Lande, R. (1996). Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos,76, 5–13.
48. Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal,19(5), 461–477.
49. Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G., Gilbert, R., & Griliches, Z. (1987). Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,18(3), 783–831.
50. Linton, J. (2011). What does journal fit and focus look like: A visual representation. Technovation,31(12), 613–614.
51. Locke, J., & Perera, H. (2001). The intellectual structure of international accounting in the early 1990s. The International Journal of Accounting,36(2), 223–249.
52. Lu, J. W. (2003). The evolving contributions in international strategic management research. Journal of International Management,9(2), 193–213.
53. Magurran, A. E. (1988). Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54. Magurran, A. E. (2004). Measuring biological diversity. Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing.
55. Magurran, A. E., & McGill, B. J. (2011). Biological diversity: Frontiers in measurement and assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56. Mansfield, E. (1986). Patents and innovation: An empirical study. Management Science,32(2), 173–181.
57. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science,2(1), 71–87.
58. Margalef, R. (1972). Homage to Evelyn Hutchinson, or why there is an upper limit to diversity. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences,44, 211–235.
59. McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,41(6), 433–443.
60. McDonald, D. G., & Dimmick, J. (2003). The conceptualization and measurement of diversity. Communication Research,30(1), 60–79.
61. Merges, R., & Nelson, R. R. (1990). On the complex economics of patent scope. Columbia Law Review,90, 839–916.
62. Morris, H., Harvey, C., & Kelly, A. (2009). Journal ranking and the ABS journal quality guide. Management Decision,47(9), 1441–1451.
63. Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2001). The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole Act of 1980. Research Policy,30(1), 99–119.
64. Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal,17, 77–91.
65. Mulkay, M. J. (1972). The social process of innovation: A study in the sociology of science. London: MacMillan.
66. Oxley, J. E. (1999). Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: the impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of inter-firm alliances. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,38(3), 283–309.
67. Palfrey, J. (2012). Intellectual property strategy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
68. Palmqvist, H. C., Sandberg, B., & Mylly, U. M. (2012). Intellectual property rights in innovation management research. Technovation,32(9/10), 502–512.
69. Peet, R. K. (1974). The measurement of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,5, 285–307.
70. Persson, O. D., Danell, R., & Schneider, J. W. (2009). How to use bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. In F. Åström, R. Danell, B. Larsen, & J. Schneider (Eds.), Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th birthday (pp. 9–24). Leuven, Belgium: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.
71. Pielou, E. C. (1969). An introduction to mathematical ecology. New York: Wiley Interscience, John Wiley & Sons.
72. Pielou, E. C. (1975). Species abundance distributions. In Ecological diversity, pp. 19–31. New York: Wiley Interscience.
73. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly,41(1), 116–145.
74. Small, H. (1980). Co-citation context analysis and the structure of paradigms. Journal of Documentation,36(3), 183–196.
75. Small, H. (2003). Paradigms, citations, and maps of science: A personal history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,54(5), 394–399.
76. Sople, V. V. (2010). Managing intellectual property: The strategic imperative. New Delhi: PHI.
77. Southwood, T. R. E., & Henderson, P. A. (2000). Ecological methods. Hoboken: Blackwell Science.
78. Stephan, P. E. (1996). The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature,34(3), 1199–1235.
79. Stirling, A. (1998). On the economics and analysis of diversity. SPRU Working Paper, no. 28.
80. Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy,15(6), 285–305.
81. Teece, D. J. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Review,40(3), 55–79.
82. Teece, D. J. (2000). Managing intellectual capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
83. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal,18(7), 509–533.
84. Teixeira, A. A., & Mota, L. (2012). A bibliometric portrait of the evolution, scientific roots and influence of the literature on university-industry links. Scientometrics,93(3), 719–743.
85. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2007). Bibliometric mapping of the computational intelligence field. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems,15(5), 625–645.
86. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2009). How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,60(8), 1635–1651.
87. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics,84(2), 523–538.
88. Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., Dekker, R., & Van den Berg, J. (2010). A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,61(12), 2405–2416.
89. Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., Van den Berg, J., & Kaymak, U. (2006). Visualizing the computational intelligence field. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine,1(4), 6–10.
90. Veerbek, A., Debackere, K., Luwel, M., & Zimmerman, E. (2002). Measuring progress and evolution in science and technology-I: The multiple uses of bibliometric indicators. International Journal of Management Reviews,4(2), 179–211.
91. Waltman, L., Van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics,4(4), 629–635.
92. White, H. D. (2003). Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,54(5), 423–434.
93. White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,49(4), 327–355.
94. Zahl, S. (1977). Jack-knifing an index of diversity. Ecology,58(4), 907–913.
95. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2013). Bibliometric methods in management and organization: A review. Academy of Management Proceedings,2013(1), 13426.