Forty years of gender disparities in Russian science: a historical bibliometric analysis

Scientometrics

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 1541-1553

  Paul Hus, Adèle ^a   Bouvier, Rébecca L ^a   Ni, Chaoqun ^b   Sugimoto, Cassidy R ^b   Pislyakov, Vladimir ^c   Larivière, Vincent ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY HIGHER SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Russian Federation)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Gender; Research impact; Research productivity; Russia

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939871347     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1386-4     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Caprasecca, A. (2009). Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system. Scientometrics,79(3), 517–539.
2. Archambault, É., Vignola-Gagne, É., Côté, G., Larivière, V., & Gingras, Y. (2006). Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases. Scientometrics,68(3), 329–342.
3. De Cheveigné, S. (2009). The career paths of women (and men) in French research. Social Studies of Science,39(1), 113–136.
4. Freeze, G. (2002). Russia: A history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Kirchik, O., Gingras, Y., & Larivière, V. (2012). Changes in publication languages and citation practices and their effect on the scientific impact of Russian science (1993–2010). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,63(7), 1411–1419.
6. Kotsemir, M. N. (2012). Publication activity of Russian researches in leading international scientific journals. Acta Naturae,4(13), 14–34.
7. Larivière, V., Archambault, É., Gingras, Y., & Vignola-Gagné, É. (2006). The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,57(8), 997–1004. doi:10.1002/asi.20349.
8. Larivière, V., Ni, C. Q., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Global gender disparities in science. Nature,504(7479), 211–213.
9. Larivière, V., Vignola-Gagné, E., Villeneuve, C., Gélinas, P., & Gingras, Y. (2011). Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: an analysis of Québec university professors. Scientometrics,87(3), 483–498.
10. Lewison, G., & Markusova, V. (2011). Female researchers in Russia: Have they become more visible? Scientometrics,89(1), 139–152.
11. Milard, B. (2009). L’héritage soviétique dans la nouvelle organisation de la science en Russie. Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances,2(3), 391–411.
12. Moed, H. (1996). Differences in the construction of SCI based bibliometric indicators among various producers: A first over view. Scientometrics,35(2), 177–191.
13. National Science Foundation (2006). Science and engineering indicators. Chapter 5: academic research and development. Data and terminology. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind06/c5/c5s3.htm#sb1. Accessed 8 May 2014.
14. OECD (2013). Jobs and wages. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/factbook-2013-en/13/02/02/index.html?itemId=/content/chapter/factbook-2013-106-en. Accessed 8 May 2014.
15. Pislyakov, V., & Gokhberg, L. (2008). Assessing the relative standing of Russian science through a set of citation and publication indicators. Excellence and emergence. Book of abstracts. 10th international conference on science and technology indicators (pp. 400–403). Vienna: ARC.
16. Savelieva, I. M., & Poletayev, A. V. (2009). Publications of Russian humanity scholars abroad: A sociometric analysis. Journal of Educational Studies,4, 199–217.
17. Suchanska, M., & Czerwosz, E. (2013). Women in technical universities in Poland. Paper presented at the AIP Conference Proceedings.
18. Witz, A. (1992). Professions and patriarchy. London: Routledge.
19. Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (2003). Women in science: Career processes and outcomes (Vol. 26). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.