Validity of automated choroidal segmentation in SS-OCT and SD-OCT

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 3202-3211

  Zhang, Li ^a   Buitendijk, Gabriëlle H S ^b   Lee, Kyungmoo ^a   Sonka, Milan ^a,c   Springelkamp, Henriët ^b   Hofman, Albert ^b,d   Vingerling, Johannes R ^b   Mullins, Robert F ^c,e   Klaver, Caroline C W ^b   Abràmoff, Michael D ^a,c,e,f  

^a University of Iowa   (United States)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

^d Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics ^*  (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^f VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Automated segmentation; Choroid; Quantification; Spectraldomain OCT; Swept source OCT

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED CHOROIDAL SEGMENTATION; BRUCH MEMBRANE; CHOROIDAL THICKNESS; CHOROIDAL VASCULATURE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; SWEPT SOURCE OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION PROCESS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; AGED; CHOROID DISEASES; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; CHOROID DISEASES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE;

EID: 84939779382     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-15669     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Nickla DL, Wallman J. The multifunctional choroid. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010;29:144–168.
2. Zarbin MA. Current concepts in the pathogenesis of agerelated macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122: 598–614.
3. Spaide RF. Age-related choroidal atrophy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147:801–810.
4. Wang M, Munch IC, Hasler PW, Prünte C, Larsen M. Central serous chorioretinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008;86:126–145.
5. Ramrattan RS, van der Schaft TL, Mooy CM, de Bruijn WC, Mulder PG, de Jong PT. Morphometric analysis of Bruch’s membrane, the choriocapillaris, and the choroid in aging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:2857–2864.
6. Read SA, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ, Alonso-Caneiro D. Choroidal thickness in childhood. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54: 3586–3593.
7. Nassif N, Cense B, Park B, et al. In vivo high-resolution videorate spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of the human retina and optic nerve. Opt Express. 2004;12:367–376.
8. Yasuno Y, Hong Y, Makita S, et al. In vivo high-contrast imaging of deep posterior eye by 1-um swept source optical coherence tomography and scattering optical coherence angiography. Opt Express. 2007;15:6121–6139.
9. Zhang L, Lee K, Niemeijer M, Mullins RF, Sonka M, Abràmoff MD. Automated segmentation of the choroid from clinical SDOCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:7510–7519.
10. Hu Z, Wu X, Ouyang Y, Ouyang Y, Sadda SR. Semiautomated segmentation of the choroid in spectral-domain opticalcoherence tomography volume scans. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:1722–1729.
11. Kajić V, Esmaeelpour M, Považay B, Marshall D, Rosin PL, Drexler W. Automated choroidal segmentation of 1060 nm OCT in healthy and pathologic eyes using a statistical model. Biomed Opt Express. 2012;3:86–103.
12. Tian J, Marziliano P, Baskaran M, Tun TA, Aung T. Automatic segmentation of the choroid in enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography images. Biomed Opt Express. 2013;4:397–411.
13. Matsuo Y, Sakamoto T, Yamashita T, Tomita M, Shirasawa M, Terasaki H. Comparisons of choroidal thickness of normal eyes obtained by two different spectral-domain OCT instruments and one swept-source OCT instrument. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:7630–7636.
14. Alonso-Caneiro D, Read SA, Collins MJ. Automatic segmentation of choroidal thickness in optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express. 2013;4:2795–2812.
15. Hofman A, Darwish Murad S, van Duijn CM, et al. The Rotterdam Study: 2014 objectives and design update. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013;28:889–926.
16. Spaide RF, Koizumi H, Pozonni MC. Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146:496–500.
17. ETDRS Research Group. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Manual of Operations. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service; 1985:1–74.
18. Wahle A, Lee K, Harding AT, et al. Extending the XNAT archive tool for image and analysis management in ophthalmology research. In: Proc. SPIE 8674, Medical Imaging 2013: Advanced PACS-based Imaging Informatics and Therapeutic Applications; February 9, 2013; Lake Buena Vista, FL. 86740M. doi:10.1117/12.2007966.
19. Lee K, Sonka M, Kwon YH, Garvin MK, Abràmoff MD. Adjustment of the retinal angle in SD-OCT of glaucomatous eyes provides better intervisit reproducibility of peripapillary RNFL thickness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:4808–4812.
20. Garvin MK, Abràmoff MD, Wu X, Russell SR, Burns TL, Sonka M. Automated 3-D intraretinal layer segmentation of macular spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009;28:1436–1447.
21. Riordan-Eva P. Anatomy & embryology of the eye. In: Riordan-Eva P, Whitcher J, eds. Vaughan & Asbury’s GeneralOphthalmology. New York, NY: Lange Medical Books/ McGraw-Hill Medical Pub. Division; 2008:chapter 1.
22. Chen X, Niemeijer M, Zhang L, Lee K, Abramoff MD, Sonka M. Three-dimensional segmentation of fluid-associated abnormalities in retinal OCT: probability constrained graph-searchgraph-cut. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012;31:1521–1531.
23. Stöckl D, Rodríguez Cabaleiro D, Van Uytfanghe K, Thienpont LM. Interpreting method comparison studies by use of the Bland–Altman plot: reflecting the importance of sample size by incorporating confidence limits and predefined error limits in the graphic. Clin Chem. 2004;50:2216–2218.
24. Bishop CM. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Vol. 1. New York: Springer; 2006:32–33.
25. Agawa T, Miura M, Ikuno Y, et al. Choroidal thickness measurement in healthy Japanese subjects by three-dimensional high-penetration optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249:1485–1492.
26. Esmaeelpour M, Povazay B, Hermann B, et al. Threedimensional 1060-nm OCT: choroidal thickness maps in normal subjects and improved posterior segment visualization in cataract patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:5260–5266.
27. Shin JW, Shin YU, Lee BR. Choroidal thickness and volume mapping by a six radial scan protocol on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2012;119: 1017–1023.
28. McCourt EA, Cadena BC, Barnett CJ, Ciardella AP, Mandava N, Kahook MY. Measurement of subfoveal choroidal thickness using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2010;41(suppl):S28–S33.
29. Li K, Wu X, Chen DZ, Sonka M. Optimal surface segmentation in volumetric images—a graph-theoretic approach. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2006;28:119–134.
30. Boykov Y, Kolmogorov V. An experimental comparison of mincut/ max-flow algorithms for energy minimization in vision. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2004;26:1124–1137.
31. Boykov Y, Funka-Lea G. Graph cuts and efficient ND image segmentation. Int J Comput Vis. 2006;70:109–131.
32. Yin Y, Zhang X, Williams R, Wu X, Anderson DD, Sonka M. LOGISMOS—layered optimal graph image segmentation of multiple objects and surfaces: cartilage segmentation in the knee joint. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010;29:2023–2037.