Operation and dynamic modeling of a novel integrated anaerobic-aerobic-anoxic reactor for sewage treatment

Chemical Engineering Science

Volumn 138, Issue , 2015, Pages 31-40

  Plascencia Jatomea, R ^a   Gonzalez I ^a   Gomez J ^a   Monroy, O ^a  

^a DEPARTAMENTO DE QUÍMICA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Hydrodynamic profile; Mathematical model; Partial nitrification; Reaction kinetics

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION REACTIONS; BIOFILMS; BIOREACTORS; FLUID DYNAMICS; HYDRODYNAMICS; KINETICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NITRATION; NITRIFICATION; NITROGEN; NITROGEN COMPOUNDS; NITROGEN REMOVAL; REACTION KINETICS; SEWAGE TREATMENT; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; LEAST SQUARE ERROR FUNCTION; MEMBRANE AERATED BIOFILM REACTORS (MABR); NITROGEN REMOVAL PROCESS; PARTIAL NITRIFICATION; UP-FLOW ANAEROBIC SLUDGE BLANKET REACTORS; VOLUMETRIC OXYGEN TRANSFER COEFFICIENT; WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

EID: 84939643437     PISSN: 00092509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2015.07.051     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abbasi T., Abassi S.A. Formation and impact of granules in fostering clean energy production and wastewater treatment in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16:1696-1708.
2. Antonella L., Viotti P., Mancini G., Torretta V. An integrated wastewater treatment system using a BAS reactor with biomass attached to tubular supports. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 113:51-60.
3. APHA/AWWA/WEF, 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington DC, USA.
4. Atwater J.E., Aske J.R. Oxygen permeation through functionalized hydrophobic tubular ceramic membranes. J. Membr. Sci 2007, 301:76-84.
5. Bhunia P., Ghangrekar M.M. Analysis, evaluation and optimization of kinetic parameters for performance appraisal and desing of UASB reactors. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:2132-2140.
6. Buntner D., Sánchez A., Garrido J.M. Feasibility of combined UASB and MBR system in dairy wastewater treatment at ambient temperatures. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 230:475-481.
7. Chan Y.J., Chong M.F., Law C.L., Hassel D.G. A review on anaerobic-aerobic treatment of industrial and municipal wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 155(1-2):1-18.
8. Chen X., Zheng P., Guo Y., Mahmood Q., Tang C., Ding S. Flow patterns of super-high-rate anaerobic bioreactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:7731-7735.
9. Cho S., Fujii N., Lee T., Okabe S. Development of simultaeneous partial nitrification and anaerobic ammonia oxidation process in a single reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:652-659.
10. Chung J., Bae W., Lee Y.W., Rittmann B.E. Shortcut biological nitrogen removal in hybrid biofilm/suspended growth reactors. Process Biochem. 2007, 42(3):320-328.
11. Durán U., Gómez J., Monroy O., Ramirez F. The effect of vynil acetate in acetoclasticmethanogenesis. Bioresour.Technol. 2011, 102:1644-1648.
12. González-Blanco G., Beristain-Cardoso R., Cuervo-Lopez F., Cervantes F.J., Gómez J. Simultaneous oxidation of ammonium and p-cresol linked to nitrite reduction by denitrifying sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 103(1):48-55.
13. González-Brambila M., Monroy O., López-Isunza F. Experimental and theoretical study of membrane-attached biofilm reactor behavior under different modes of oxygen supply for the treatment of synthetic wastewater. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2006, 61:5268-5281.
14. Halling-Sorensen B. Process Chemistry and Biochemistry of Nitrificaction in Studies in Environmental Science 1993, Vol. 54. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
15. Hibiya K., Terada A., Tsuneda S., Hirata A. Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification by controlling vertical and horizontal microenvironment in a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor. J. Biotechnol. 2003, 100:23-32.
16. Hu S., Yang F., Sun C., Zhang J., Wang T. Simultaneous removal of COD and nitrogen using a novel carbon-membrane aerated biofilm reactor. J. Environ. Sci. 2008, 20:142-148.
17. Huiliñir C., Aspe E., Roeckel M. Model of simultaneous denitrification and methanogenesis in an upflow packed-bed biofilm reactor: nitrogen compounds inhibition and pseudo two-dimensional biofilm model. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2009, 84:254-268.
18. Huiliñir C., Romero R., Munoz C., Bornhardt C., Roeckel M. Dynamic modeling of partial nitrification in a rotating disk biofilm reactor: calibration, validation and simulation. Biochem. Eng. J. 2010, 52:7-18.
19. Jin R., Zhen P. Kinetics of nitrogen removal in high rate anammoxupflow filter. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 170(2-3):652-656.
20. Khin T., Annachhatre A.P. Novel microbial nitrogen removal processes. Biotechnol. Adv. 2004, 22:519-532.
21. Liu H., Yang F., Shi S., Liu X. Effect of substrate COD/N ratio on performance and microbial community structure of a membrane aerated biofilm reactor. Journal of Environmental Sci. 2010, 22(4):540-546.
22. Matsumoto S., Terada A., Tsuneda S. Modeling of membrane-aerated biofilm: effect of C/N ratio, biofilm thickness and Surface loading of oxygen on feasibility of simultaneous nitrification and denitrification. Biochenm. Eng. J. 2007, 37:98-107.
23. Montalvo, M.S., Guerrero, S.L., 2003. Tratamiento Anaerobio de Residuos.
24. Mudliar S., Banerjee S., Vaidya A., Devotta S. Steady state model for evaluation of external and internal mass transfer effects in an immobilized biofilm. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:3468-3474.
25. Ruiz G., Jeison D., Chamy R. Nitrification with high nitrite accumulation for the treatment of wastewater with high ammonia concentration. Water Res. 2003, 37:1371-1377.
26. Satoh H., Ono H., Rulin B., Kamo J., Okabe S., Fukushi K. Macroscale and microscale analyses of nitrification and denitrification in biofilms attached on membrane aerated biofilm reactors. Water Res. 2004, 38:1633-1641.
27. Semmens M.J. Alternative MBR configurations: using membranes for gas transfer. Desalination 2008, 231:236-242.
28. Sperling M, Freire V.H., LemosChernicharo C.A. Performance evaluation of a UASB-activated sludge system treating municipal wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 2001, 43:323-328.
29. Tandukar M., Ohashi A., Harada H. Performance comparition of a pilot scale UASB and DHS system and activated sludge process for the treatment of municipal wastewater. Water Res. 2007, 41:2697-2705.
30. Terada A., Yamamoto T., Igarashi R., Tsuneda S., Hirata A. Faseability of a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor to achieve cotrollable nitrification. Biochem. Eng. J. 2006, 28:123-130.
31. Tsushima I., Ogasawara Y., Kindaichi T., Satoh H., Okabe S. Development of high rate anaerobic ammonium oxidizing (ANAMMOX) biofilm reactors. Water Res. 2007, 41:1623-1634.
32. Van Hulle S., Volcke W.H., Teruel E.I.P., Donckels J.L., van Loosdrecht B., Vanrolleghem PA M.C.M. Influence of temperature and pH on the kinetics of the SHARON nitritation process. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2007, 82:471-480.
33. Verlicchi P., Massoti L., Galletti A. Wastewater polishing index: a tool for a rapid quality assessment of reclaimed wastewater. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2011, 173:267-277.
34. Wei X., Li B., Zhao S., Qiang C., Zhang H., Wang S. COD and nitrogen removal in facilitated transfer membrane-aerated biofilm reactor (FT-MABR). J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 389:257-264.
35. Wiesmann U. Biological nitrogen removal from wastewater. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology 1994, vol. 51:113-154. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
36. Wu C., Ushiwaka S., Horii H., Yamagiwa K. Membrane-attached biofilms as a mean to facilitate nitrification in activated sludge process and its effect on the microfaunal population. Biochem. Eng. J. 2008, 40:430-436.
37. Zhang T., Fu C., Bishop PL Y.L. Competition for substrate and space in biofilms. Water Environ. Res. 1995, 67:992-1003.