Rhema: A real-time in-situ intelligent interface to help people with public speaking

International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Proceedings IUI

Volumn 2015-January, Issue , 2015, Pages 286-295

  Tanveer, M Iftekhar ^a   Lin, Emy ^b   Hoque, Mohammed ^b  

^a University of Rochester   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Design techniques; Google Glass; Human factor; Live feedback; Public speaking; User study

Indexed keywords

FEEDBACK CONTROL; GLASS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; WEARABLE COMPUTERS;

DESIGN TECHNIQUE; FEEDBACK STRATEGIES; INFORMATION DELIVERY; INTELLIGENT INTERFACE; INTELLIGENT USER INTERFACES; NUMBER OF PEOPLES; PUBLIC SPEAKING; USER STUDY;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 84939634789     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2678025.2701386     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Batrinca, L., Stratou, G., Shapiro, A., Morency, L.-P., and Scherer, S. Cicero-towards a multimodal virtual audience platform for public speaking training. Intelligent Virtual Agents, Springer (2013), 116-128.
2. Biocca, F., Owen, C., Tang, A., and Bohil, C. Attention Issues in Spatial Information Systems: Directing Mobile Users' Visual Attention Using Augmented Reality. Journal of Management Information Systems 23, 2007, 163-184.
3. Boersma, P. Accurate short-term analysis of the fundamental frequency and the harmonics-to-noise ratio of a sampled sound. IFA Proceedings 17, (1993), 97-110.
4. Boersma, Paul; Weenink, D. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. Ear and Hearing 32, 2011, 266.
5. Chollet, M. et al. An interactive virtual audience platform for public speaking training. Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems, (2014), 1657-1658.
6. Cohen, J. A coefficient of agreement of nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, (1960), 37-46.
7. Dunn, O. J. Multiple Comparisons Among Means. Journal of the American Statistical Association 56, (1961), 52-64.
8. Finlay, D. Motion perception in the peripheral visual field. Perception 11, 1982, 457-462.
9. Friedman, M. A comparison of alternative tests of significance for the problem of m rankings. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 11, 1(1940), 86-92.
10. Ha, K., Chen, Z., Hu, W., Richter, W., Pillai, P., and Satyanarayanan, M. Towards wearable cognitive assistance. MobiSys'14, (2014), 68-81.
11. Hoogterp, B. Your Perfect Presentation: Speak in Front of Any Audience Anytime Anywhere and Never Be Nervous Again. McGraw Hill Professional, 2014.
12. Hoque, M., Courgeon, M., and Martin, J. Mach: My automated conversation coach. Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing, (2013), 697-706.
13. Koppensteiner, M. and Grammer, K. Motion patterns in political speech and their influence on personality ratings. Journal of Research in Personality 44, (2010), 374-379.
14. Krippendorff, K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 2004.
15. McAtamney, G. and Parker, C. An examination of the effects of a wearable display on informal face-to-face communication. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2006 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2006), 45-54.
16. McCrickard, D. S., Catrambone, R., Chewar, C. M., and Stasko, J. T. Establishing tradeoffs that leverage attention for utility: Empirically evaluating information display in notification systems. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 58, (2003), 547-582.
17. North, M. M., North, S. M., Coble, J. R., et al. Virtual reality therapy: an effective treatment for the fear of public speaking. The International Journal of Virtual Reality 3(1998), 1-3, (1998).
18. Ofek, E., Iqbal, S. T., and Strauss, K. Reducing disruption from subtle information delivery during a conversation: mode and bandwidth investigation. Proceedings of CHI 2013, (2013), 3111-3120.
19. Pashler, H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychological bulletin 116, (1994).
20. Shiffrin, R. M. and Gardner, G. T. Visual processing capacity and attentional control. Journal of experimental psychology 93, (1972), 72-82.
21. Strangert, E. and Gustafson, J. What makes a good speaker? subject ratings, acoustic measurements and perceptual evaluations. INTERSPEECH, (2008), 1688-1691.
22. Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., and Crouch, D. J. Fatal distraction? A comparison of the cell-phone driver and the drunk driver. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48, (2006), 381-391.
23. Teeters, A., Kaliouby, R. El, and Picard, R. Self-Cam: feedback from what would be your social partner. ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Research posters, (2006).
24. Wallechinsky, D. The book of lists. Canongate Books, 2009.
25. Wilcoxon, F. Individual comparisons of grouped data by ranking methods. Journal of economic entomology 39, (1946), 269.
26. Zhang, Z. Microsoft kinect sensor and its effect. MultiMedia, IEEE 19, 2(2012), 4-10.