Developing a safety indicator to measure the safety level during design for safety

Safety Science

Volumn 80, Issue , 2015, Pages 252-263

  Sadeghi, Leyla ^a   Mathieu, Luc ^b   Tricot, Nicolas ^c   Al Bassit, Lama ^c  

^a ARTS ET MÉTIERS PARISTECH   (France)

^b Ecole Normale Superieure de Cachan   (France)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Design for safety; Safety assessment; Safety indicator; Safety level

Indexed keywords

DESIGN; POWER TAKEOFFS;

DESIGN FOR SAFETY; DESIGN PHASIS; DESIGN PROCESS; HUMAN SAFETY; SAFETY ASSESSMENTS; SAFETY INDICATOR; SAFETY LEVEL;

SAFETY ENGINEERING;

ARTICLE; CASE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE SAFETY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DESIGN; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; SAFETY INDICATOR;

EID: 84939624061     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: 18791042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Caputo A.C., Pelagagge P.M., Salini P. AHP-based methodology for selecting safety devices of industrial machinery. Safety Sci. 2013, 53:202-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.10.006.
2. Coulibaly A., Houssin R., Mutel B. Maintainability and safety indicators at design stage for mechanical products. Comput. Indus. 2008, 59(5):438-449. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0166361507001856 (accessed 22.03.13).
3. Duijm N.J., et al. Management of health, safety and environment in process industry. Safety Sci. 2008, 46:908-920.
4. EN 563, 1994. Safety of machinery - Temperatures of touchable surfaces - Ergonomics data to establish temperature limit values for hot surfaces.
5. EN ISO 13849-1, 2008. Safety of machinery - Safety-related parts of control systems - Part 1: General principles for design.
6. FD ISO/TR 14121-2, 2008. Safety of machinery - Risk assessment - Part 2: Practical guidance and examples of methods.
7. Ghemraoui R., Mathieu L., Tricot N. Design method for systematic safety integration. CIRP Annals - Manuf. Technol. 2009, 58:161-164.
8. Ghemraoui, R., Mathieu, L., Tricot, N., 2009b. Systematic human-safety analysis approach based on axiomatic design principles. In: ICAD2009 The Fifth International Conference on Axiomatic Design. p. 8. http://www.axiomaticdesign.com/technology/icad/icad2009/icad2009_01.pdf.
9. Gray P.C., Wiedemann P.M. Risk management and sustainable development: mutual lessons from approaches to the use of indicators. J. Risk Res. 1999, 2(December 2014):201-218.
10. Hale A. Why safety performance indicators?. Safety Sci. 2009, 47(4):479-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.07.018.
11. Harms-Ringdahl L. Analysis of safety functions and barriers in accidents. Safety Sci. 2009, 47(3):353-363. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S092575350800091X (accessed 29.09.13).
12. Hellevik O. Research Methodology in Sociology and Political Science 1999, Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, Norway, (In Norwegian).
13. Hollnagel E. Risk + barriers = safety?. Safety Sci. 2008, 46:221-229.
14. Hopkins A. Thinking about process safety indicators. Safety Sci. 2009, 47:460-465. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0925753507001920.
15. Khan F.I., Abbasi S.a. Inherently safer design based on rapid risk analysis. J. Loss Prevent. Process Indus. 1998, 11:361-372.
16. Kleiven, S., 2007. A Parametric study of energy absorbing foams for head injury prevention. In: The 20th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference (ESV), Lyon, France, June 18-21.
17. LaPlaca M.C., et al. CNS injury biomechanics and experimental models. Progress Brain Res. 2007, 161.
18. MIL-STD-882D, 2000. Standard practic for system safety.
19. NF EN 1005-2+A1, 2008. Safety of machinery - Human physical performance - Part 2: Manual handling of machinery and component parts of machinery.
20. NF EN 1005-3+A1, 2008. Safety of machinery - Human physical performance - Part 3: Recommended force limits for machinery operation,.
21. NF EN 1005-4+A1, 2008. Safety of machinery - Human physical performance - Part 4: Evaluation of working postures and movements in relation to machinery.
22. NF EN 12198-1, 2008. Safety of machinery - Assessment and reduction of risks arising from radiation emitted by machinery - Part 1: General principles.
23. NF EN 1299+A1, 2009. Mechanical vibration and shock - Vibration isolation of machines - Information for the application of source isolation.
24. NF EN 614-1+A1, 2009. Safety of machinery - Ergonomic design principles - Part 1: Terminology and general principles.
25. NF EN ISO 11688-1, 2009. Acoustics - Recommended practice for the design of low-noise machinery and equipment - Part 1?: planning.
26. NF EN ISO 11688-2, 2004. Acoustics - Recommended practice for the design of low-noise machinery and equipment - Part 2?: introduction to the physics of low-noise design.
27. NF EN ISO 12100, 2010. Safety of machinery - General principles for design - Risk assessment and risk reduction.
28. NF EN ISO 9612, 2009. Acoustics - Determination of occupational noise exposure - Engineering method.
29. NF ISO 11228-2, 2007. Ergonomics - Manual handling - Part 2?: pushing and pulling.
30. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2003. Guidance on safety performance indicators. Guidance for industry, public authorities and communities for developing SPI programmes related to chemical accident prevention, preparedness a. OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications. Series on Chemical Accidents 11.
31. Øien K. A framework for the establishment of organizational risk indicators. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety 2001, 74:147-167.
32. Øien K. Risk indicators as a tool for risk control. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety 2001, 74:129-145.
33. Øien K., Utne I.B., Herrera I.a. Building safety indicators: Part 1 - theoretical foundation. Safety Sci. 2011, 49:148-161.
34. Osmundsen P., Aven T., Erik Vinnem J. Safety, economic incentives and insurance in the Norwegian petroleum industry. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety 2008, 93:137-143.
35. Pahl, G. et al., 2007. Engineering design a systematic approach.
36. Reiman T., Pietikäinen E. Leading indicators of system safety - monitoring and driving the organizational safety potential. Safety Sci. 2012, 50(10):1993-2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.07.015.
37. Sadeghi, L. et al., 2013. Toward design for safety Part 1?: functional reverse engineering driven by axiomatic design. In: ICAD 2013 The Seventh International Conference on Axiomatic Design. pp. 1-8.
38. Saqib N., Tahir Siddiqi M. Aggregation of safety performance indicators to higher-level indicators. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety 2008, 93:307-315.
39. Suh N.P. Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications 2001, Oxford University Press, New York.
40. Suh N.P. The Principles of Design 1990, N.Y.O.U. Press.
41. Tarrants W. The Measurement of Safety Performance 1980, Garland STPM Press, New York, USA.
42. Vinnem J.E. Risk indicators for major hazards on offshore installations. Safety Sci. 2010, 48(6):770-787. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.02.015.