Salpingostomy in the treatment of hydrosalpinx: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Human Reproduction

Volumn 30, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 1882-1895

  Chu, J ^a   Harb, H M ^a   Gallos, I D ^a   Dhillon, R ^a   Al Rshoud, F M ^b   Robinson, L ^a   Coomarasamy, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b HASHEMITE UNIVERSITY   (Jordan)

Author keywords

clinical pregnancy; hydrosalpinx; salpingostomy; tubal disease; tubal surgery

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTION; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; HUMAN; HYDROSALPINX; LIVE BIRTH; META ANALYSIS; NEWCASTLE OTTAWA QUALITY ASSESSMENT SCALE; PREGNANCY RATE; RATING SCALE; REVIEW; SALPINGOSTOMY; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; ADULT; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; PREGNANCY; SALPINGITIS;

ADULT; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; SALPINGITIS; SALPINGOSTOMY;

EID: 84939601658     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: 14602350     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev135     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Akman MA, Garcia JE, Damewood MD, Watts LD, Katz E. Hydrosalpinx affect the implantation of previously cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod 1996;11:1013-1014.
2. Andersen AN, Yue Z, Meng FJ, Petersen K. Low implantation rate after in-vitro fertilisation in patients with hydrosalpinges diagnosed by ultrasonography. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1935-1938.
3. Audebert AJM. Tubal surgery for infertility: report on 172 distal salpingoplasties [French]. Gynecologie 1980;31:485-489.
4. Audebert AJM, Pouly LP, Bonifacie B, Yazbeck C. Laparoscopic surgery for distal tubal occlusions: lessons learned from a historical series of 434 cases. Fertil Steril 2014;102:1203-1208.
5. Bahamondes L, Bueno JGR, Hardy E, Vera S, Pimental E, Ramos M. Identification of main risk factors for tubal infertility. Fertil Steril 1984;61:478-482.
6. Bayrak A, Harp D, Saadat P, Eliran M, Paulson RJ. Recurrence of hydrosalpinges after cuff neosalpingostomy in a poor prognosis population. J Assist Reprod Genet 2006;23:285-288.
7. Beyth Y, Bercovici B. Evaluation of microsurgical approach to reconstructive surgery in 80 infertile patients. J Obstet Gynaecol 1982;2:237-243.
8. Blazer AS, Hogan JW, Seifer DB, Frishman GN, Wheeler CA, Haning RV. The impact of hydrosalpinx on successful pregnancy in tubal factor infertility treated by in vitro fertilisation. Fertil Steril 1997;67:517-520.
9. Boer-Meisel ME, te Velde ER, Habbema JD, Kardaun JW. Predicting the pregnancy outcome in patients treated for hydrosalpinx: a prospective study. Fertil Steril 1986;45:23-29.
10. Bontis JN, Dinas KD. Management of hydrosalpinx: reconstructive surgery or IVF? Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000;900:260-271.
11. Bontis JN, Theodoridis TD. Laparoscopic management of hydrosalpinx. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006;1092:199-210.
12. Camus E, Poncelet C, Goffinet F, Wainer B, Merlet F, Nisand I, Philippe HJ. Pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization in cases of tubal infertility with and without hydrosalpinx: a meta-analysis of published comparative studies. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1243-1249.
13. Chanelles O, Ducarme G, Sifer C, Hugues J-N, Touboul C, Poncelet C. Hydrosalpinx and infertility: what about conservative surgical management? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011;159:122-126.
14. Chong AP. Pregnancy outcome in neosalpingostomy by the cuff vs Bruhat technique using the carbon dioxide laser. J Gynecol Surg 1991;7:207-210.
15. Cohen J, Feinerman D, Palmer R, Rumeau RC. Results of a retrospective study on the outcome of tubal repair surgery in sterility. Acta Eur Fertil 1972;3:321-327.
16. Dubuisson JB, Chapron C, Morice P, Aubriot FX, Foulot H, Bouquet de JJ. Laparoscopic salpingostomy: Fertility the tubal mucosal appearance. Hum Reprod 1994;9:334-339.
17. Dubuisson JB, Morice P, Chapron C, Aubriot FX, Foulot H, Bouquet de JJ. Laparoscopic salpingostomy: Fertility results [French]. Contracept Fertil Sex 1995;23:109-114.
18. Flemming H, Hull MGR. Impaired implantation after in vitro fertilisation treatment associated with hydrosalpinx. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1996;103:268.
19. Freeman MR, Whitworth M, Hill GA. Permanent impairment of embryo development by hydrosalpinges. 1998.
20. Gomel V, Taylor PJ. In vitro fertilization versus reconstructive tubal surgery. J Assist Reprod Genet 1992;9:306-309.
21. Jansen RPS. Surgery-pregnancy time intervals after salpingolysis, unilateral salpingostomy, and bilateral salpingostomy. Fertil Steril 1980;34:222-225.
22. Johnson NP, van Voorst S, Sowter MC, Strandell A, Mol BW. Cochrane Database CD002125. 2010.
23. Kassabji M, Sims JA, Butler L, Muasher SJ. Reduced pregnancy outcome in patients with unilateral or bilateral hydrosalpinx after in vitro fertilisation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1994;54:129-132.
24. Katz E, Akman MA, Damewood MD, Garcia JE. Deleterious effect of the presence of hydrosalpinx on implantation and pregnancy rates with in vitro fertilisation. Fertil Steril 1996;66:122-125.
25. Kosasa TS, Hale RW. Treatment of hydrosalpinx using a single incision eversion procedure. Int J Fertil 1988;33:319-323.
26. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009;339:b2700.
27. 2 laser and electrosurgery procedures. Fertil Steril 1983;40:472-475.
28. McComb PF, Taylor RC. Pregnancy outcome after unilateral salpingostomy with a contralateral patent oviduct. Fertil Steril 2001;76:1278-1279.
29. Milingos SD, Kallipolitis GK, Loutradis DC, Liapi AG, Hassan EA, Mavrommatis CG, Miaris SG, Michalas SP. Laparoscopic treatment of hydrosalpinx: factors affecting pregnancy rate. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2000;7:355-361.
30. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009;339:b2535.
31. Murray DL, Sagostin AW, Widra EA, Levy MJ. The adverse effect of hydrosalpinges on in vitro fertilisation pregnancy rates and the benefit of surgical correction. Fertil Steril 1998;69:41-45.
32. Savaris RF, Giudice LC. The influence of hydrosalpinx on markers of endometrial receptivity. Semin Reprod Med 2007;25:476-482.
33. Sharif K, Coomarasamy A. Assisted Reproduction Techniques: Challenges and Management Options. UK: Wiley-Blackwell Press, 2012.
34. Singhal V, Li TC, Cooke ID. An analysis of factors influencing the outcome of 232 consecutive tubal microsurgery cases. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;98:628-636.
35. Smalldridge J, Tait J. The results of tubal surgery in the treatment of infertility in Wellington 1986-90. N Z Med J 1993;106:124-126.
36. Strandell A, Waldenstrøm U, Nilsson L, Hamberger L. Hydrosalpinx reduces in-vitro fertilization/embryo transfer pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod, 1994;9:861-863.
37. Strandell A, Lindhard A, Wldenstrom U, Thorburn J, Janson PO, Hamberger L. Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: a prospective, randomized multicentre trial in Scandinavia on salpingectomy prior to IVF. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2762-2769.
38. Taylor RC, Berkowitz J, McComb PF. Role of laparoscopic salpingostomy in the treatment of hydrosalpinx. Fertil Steril 2001;75:594-600.
39. Teoh TG, Kondaveeti U, Darling MR. The management of female infertility by tubal microsurgical reconstruction: a ten year review. Ir J Med Sci 1995;164:212-214.
40. Tulandi T, Farag R, McInnes RA, Gelfand MM, Wright CV, Vilos GA. Reconstructive surgery of hydrosalpinx with and without the carbon dioxide laser. Fertil Steril 1984;42:839-842.
41. Vandromme J, Chasse E, Lejeune B, Van Rysselberge M, Delvigne A, Leroy F. Hydrosalpinges in in-vitro fertilization: an unfavourable prognostic feature. Hum Reprod 1995;10:576-579.
42. Van Voorhis BJ, Sparks AET, Syrop CH, Stovall DW. Ultrasound-guided aspiration of hydrosalpinges is associated with improved pregnancy and implantation rates after in-vitro fertilization cycles. Hum Reprod 1998;13:736-739.
43. Wainer R, Camus E, Camier B, Martin C, Vasseur C, Merlet F. Does hydrosalpinx reduce the pregnancy rate after in vitro fertilisation? Fertil Steril 1997;68:1022-1026.
44. Winston RM. Tubal surgery or in vitro fertilization (IVF)? J Assist Reprod Genet 1992;9:309-311.
45. Winston RM, Margara RA. Microsurgical salpingostomy is not an obsolete procedure. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;98:637-642.
46. Zeyneloglu HB, Arici A, Olive DL. Adverse effects of hydrosalpinx on pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1998;70:492-499.