Impact of access site choice on outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis

American Heart Journal

Volumn 170, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 353-361.e6

  Pancholy, Samir B ^a   Palamaner Subash Shantha, Ghanshyam ^b   Romagnoli, Enrico ^c   Kedev, Sasko ^d   Bernat, Ivo ^e   Rao, Sunil V ^f   Jolly, Sanjit ^g   Bertrand, Olivier F ^h   Patel, Tejas M ⁱ  

^a Janet Weis Children s Hospital   (United States)

^b Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education   (United States)

^c BELCOLLE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^d University Cardiology Clinic   (Macedonia)

^e CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^f DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^g MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^h LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

ⁱ Apex Heart Institute   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLEEDING; CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; NON ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SMOKING; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TRANSRADIAL ACCESS; VASCULAR ACCESS; CAUSE OF DEATH; HEALTH; HEART CATHETERIZATION; MORTALITY; PROCEDURES; RADIAL ARTERY; SHOCK, CARDIOGENIC; SURVIVAL RATE; TRENDS;

CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CAUSE OF DEATH; GLOBAL HEALTH; HUMANS; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RADIAL ARTERY; SHOCK, CARDIOGENIC; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 84939561911     PISSN: 00028703     EISSN: 10976744     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. R.J. Goldberg, F.A. Spencer, J.M. Gore, and et al. Thirty-year trends (1975 to 2005) in the magnitude of, management of, and hospital death rates associated with cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a population-based perspective Circulation 119 2009 1211 1219
2. D.S. Menees, E.D. Peterson, Y. Wang, and et al. Door-to-balloon time and mortality among patients undergoing primary PCI N Engl J Med 369 2013 901 909
3. S.K. Mehta, A.D. Frutkin, J.B. Lindsey, and et al. Bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the development of a clinical risk algorithm from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009 222 229
4. S.V. Rao, M.G. Cohen, D.E. Kandzari, and et al. The transradial approach to percutaneous coronary intervention: historical perspective, current concepts, and future directions J Am Coll Cardiol 55 2010 2187 2195
5. D.V. Baklanov, L.A. Kaltenbach, S.P. Marso, and et al. The prevalence and outcomes of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: analysis from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (2007 to 2011) J Am Coll Cardiol 61 2013 420 426
6. M.A. Mamas, K. Ratib, H. Routledge, and et al. Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013 698 706
7. E. Romagnoli, G. Biondi-Zoccai, A. Sciahbasi, and et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study J Am Coll Cardiol 60 2012 2481 2489
8. A.P. Amin, J.A. House, D.M. Safley, and et al. Costs of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention JACC Cardiovasc Interv 87 2013 827 834
9. B.P. Bell, A.F. Iqtidar, and C.T. Pyne Impella assisted transradial coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes and cardiogenic shock: case series Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 78 2011 880 885
10. E. Romagnoli, M. De Vita, F. Burzotta, and et al. Radial versus femoral approach comparison in percutaneous coronary intervention with intraaortic balloon pumpsupport: the RADIAL PUMP UP registry Am Heart J 166 2013 1019 1026
11. S.S. Jolly, S. Yusuf, J. Cairns, and et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial Lancet 377 2011 1409 1420
12. I. Bernat, D. Horak, J. Stasek, and et al. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by radial or femoral approach in a multicenter randomized clinical trial: the STEMI-RADIAL trial J Am Coll Cardiol 63 2014 964 972
13. D.F. Stroup, J.A. Berlin, S.C. Morton, and et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group JAMA 283 2000 2008 2012
14. A. Stang Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses Eur J Epidemiol 25 2010 603 605
15. J.J. Deeks, J.P.T. Higgins, and D.G. Altman Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses J.P.T. Higgins, S. Green, Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 2008 John Wiley & Sons Chichester, UK 133 177
16. R. DerSimonian, and N. Laird Meta-analysis in clinical trials Control Clin Trials 7 1986 177 188
17. I. Bernat, E. Abdelaal, G. Plourde, and et al. Early and late outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention by radial or femoral approach inpatients presenting in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock Am Heart J 165 2013 338 343
18. T. Fujii, N. Masuda, T. Ijichi, and et al. Transradial intervention for patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction with or without cardiogenic shock Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 83 2014 E1 E7
19. A. Iga, K. Wagatsuma, J. Yamazaki, and et al. Transradial versus transfemoral coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: is transradial coronary intervention suitable for emergency PCI in high-risk acute myocardial infarction? J Invasive Cardiol 26 2014 196 202
20. S. Kedev, O. Kalpak, S. Dharma, and et al. Complete transitioning to the radial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a real-world single-center registry of 1808 consecutive patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction J Invasive Cardiol 26 2014 475 482
21. M.A. Mamas, S.G. Anderson, K. Ratib, and et al. Arterial access site utilization in cardiogenic shock in the United Kingdom: is radial access feasible? Am Heart J 167 2014 900 908.e1
22. O. Rodriguez-Leor, E. Fernandez-Nofrerias, X. Carrillo, and et al. Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: a single-center experience Am Heart J 165 2013 280 285
23. J.P. Higgins, S.G. Thompson, J.J. Deeks, and et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses BMJ 327 2003 557 560
24. M. Egger, G. Davey Smith, M. Schneider, and et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test BMJ 315 1997 629 634
25. StataCorp Stata statistical software: release 8.2 2004 StataCorp LP College Station, TX
26. D. Antoniucci, R. Valenti, A. Migliorini, and et al. Abciximab therapy improves survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by early cardiogenic shock undergoing coronary artery stent implantation Am J Cardiol 90 2002 353 357