Collaborative research for academic knowledge creation: How team characteristics, motivation, and processes influence research impact

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 460-473

  Jeong, Seongkyoon ^a   Choi, Jae Young ^b  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Hanyang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Co authorship analysis; Negative binomial regression; Research collaboration; Research management

Indexed keywords

LEADERSHIP; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84939551929     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scu067     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., Di Costa, F. and Solazzi, M. (2009) 'University-industry collaboration in Italy: An extensive bibliometric survey', Technovation, 29: 498-507.
2. Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C. and Galán, J. L. (2006) 'Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis', Journal of Management Studies, 43: 957-83.
3. Amabile, T. M., Patterson, C., Mueller, J., Wojcik, T. et al. (2001) 'Academic-practitioner collaboration in management research: A case of cross-profession collaboration', Academy of Management Journal, 44: 418-31.
4. Antonakis, J., Avolio, B. J. and Sivasubramaniam, N. (2003) 'Context and leadership: An examination of the nine-factor fullrange leadership theory using the multifactor leadership questionnaire', Leadership Quarterly, 14: 261-95.
5. Barnes, C. M., Hollenbeck, J. R., Wagner, D. T., DeRue, D. S. et al. (2008) 'Harmful help: The costs of backing-up behavior in teams', Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 529-39.
6. Bohen, S. J. and Stiles, J. (1998) 'Experimenting with models of faculty collaboration: Factors that promote their success', New Directions for Institutional Research, 100: 39-55.
7. Bozeman, B. and Corley, E.A. (2004) 'Scientists collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital', Research Policy, 33: 599-616.
8. Bozeman, B. and Gaughan, M. (2011) 'How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaborative motives and strategies of academic researchers', Research Policy, 40: 1393-402.
9. Bozeman, B., Dietz, J. and Gaughan, M. (2001) 'Scientific and technical human capital: An alternative model for research evaluation', International Journal of Technology Management, 22: 636-55.
10. Breschi, S. and Malerba, F. (2011) 'Assessing the scientific and technological output of EU Framework Programmes: Evidence from the FP6 projects in the ICT field', Scientometrics, 88: 239-57.
11. Brown, L. D. and Gardner, J. C. (1985) 'Using citation analysis to assess the impact of journals and articles on contemporary accounting research (CAR)', Journal of Accounting Research, 23: 84-109.
12. Bruce, M., Leverick, F., Littler, D. and Wilson, D. (1995) 'Success factors for collaborative product development: A study of suppliers of information and communication technology', R&D Management, 25: 33-44.
13. Cameron, A. C. and Trivedi, P. K. (1986) 'Econometric models based on count data: Comparison and application of some estimators and tests', Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1: 29-53.
14. Carmeli, A. and Waldman, D.A. (2010) 'Leadership, behavioral context, and the performance of work groups in a knowledgeintensive setting', The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35/4: 384-400.
15. Cole, J. R. and Zuckerman, H. (1987) 'Marriage, motherhood and research performance in science', Scientific American, 256: 119-25.
16. Dasgupta, P. and David, P. A. (1994) 'Toward a new economics of science', Research Policy, 23: 487-521.
17. De Dreu, C. K. W. and West, M. A. (2001) 'Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making', Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 1191-201.
18. Ding, W. W., Murray, F. and Stuart, T. E. (2006) 'Gender differences in patenting in the academic life sciences', Science, 313/5787: 665-7.
19. Duehr, E. E. and Bono, J. E. (2006) 'Men, women, and managers: Are stereotypes finally changing?', Personnel Psychology, 59: 815-46.
20. Eagly, A. H. (2003) 'The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence', Leadership Quarterly, 14: 807-34.
21. Eagly, A. H. (2007) 'Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the contradictions', Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31: 1-12.
22. Eagly, A. H. and Carli, L. L. (2003) 'The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence', Leadership Quarterly, 14: 807-34.
23. Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J. and Makhijani, M. G. (1995) 'Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis', Psychological Bulletin, 117: 125-45.
24. Fox, M. F. (2005) 'Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists', Social Studies of Science, 35: 131-50.
25. Fox, M. F. and Stephan, P. E. (2001) 'Careers of young scientists: Preferences, prospects, and realities by gender and field', Social Studies of Science, 31: 109-22.
26. Frenken, K., Holzl, W. and Vor, F. (2005) 'The citation impact of research collaborations: The case of European biotechnology and applied microbiology (1988-2002)', Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 22: 9-30.
27. Glänzel, W. (2001) 'National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations', Scientometrics, 51: 69-115.
28. Glänzel, W. and Schubert, A. (2001) 'Double effort= double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry', Scientometrics, 50/2: 199-214.
29. Gonzalez-Brambila, C. and Veloso, F. (2007) 'The determinants of research output and impact: A study of Mexican researchers', Research Policy, 36: 1035-51.
30. Hoegl, M. and Gemuenden, H. G. (2001) 'Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence', Organization Science, 12: 435-49.
31. Jassawalla, A. R. and Sashittal, H. C. (1998) 'An examination of collaboration in high-technology new product development processes', Journal of Product InnovationManagement, 15: 237-54.
32. Jeong, S., Choi, J. Y. and Kim, J. (2011) 'The determinants of research collaboration modes: Exploring the effects of research and researcher characteristics on co-authorship', Scientometrics, 89: 967-83.
33. Jeong, S., Choi, J. Y. and Kim, J.-Y. (2014) 'On the drivers of international collaboration: The impact of informal communication, motivation, and research resources', Science and Public Policy, 41: 520-31.
34. Jones, B. F., Wuchty, S. and Uzzi, B. (2008) 'Multi-university research teams: Shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science', Science, 322/5905: 1259-62.
35. Katz, J. S. and Martin, B. R. (1997) 'What is research collaboration?', Research Policy, 26: 1-18.
36. Kiopa, A., Melkers, J. and Tanyildic, Z. (2009) 'Women in academic science: Mentors and career development' in Women in Science and Technology, K. Prpic, L. Oliveira and S. Hemlin (eds), pp. 55-84. Zagreb, Croatia: Institute for Social Research.
37. Lee, F., Caza, A., Edmondson, A. and Thomke, S. (2003) 'New knowledge creation in organizations' in Positive Organizational Scholarship, K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton and R. E. Quinn (eds), pp. 194-206. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
38. Lee, S. and Bozeman, B. (2005) 'The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity', Social Studies of Science, 35: 673-702.
39. Liao, C. H. (2011) 'How to improve research quality? Examining the impacts of collaboration intensity and member diversity in collaboration networks', Scientometrics, 86: 747-61.
40. Mauleón, E. and Bordons, M. (2006) 'Productivity, impact and publication habits by gender in the area of materials science', Scientometrics, 66: 199-218.
41. Mayer, A. P., Files, J. A., Ko, M. and Blair, J. E. (2008) 'Academic advancement of women in medicine: Do socialized gender differences have a role in mentoring?', Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 83: 204-7.
42. Merton, R. K. (1973) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago, IL: University Chicago Press.
43. Moed, H. F. (2008) 'UK research assessment exercises: Informed judgments on research quality or quantity?', Scientometrics, 74: 153-61.
44. Moed, H. F., Burger, W. J. M., Frankfort, J. G. and Raan, A. F. J. van (1985) 'The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance', Research Policy, 14: 131-49.
45. Nemeth, C. J. and Goncalo, J. A. (2005) 'Creative collaborations from afar: The benefits of independent authors', Creativity Research Journal, 17/1: 1-8.
46. OECD. (2002) Frascati Manual. Paris: OECD.
47. Probert, B. (2005) '"I just couldn't fit it in"': Gender and unequal outcomes in academic careers', Gender, Work and Organization, 12: 50-72.
48. Raan, A. F. J. van (2003) 'The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments', Citeseer, 1: 20-9.
49. Rigby, J. and Edler, J. (2005) 'Peering inside research networks: Some observations on the effect of the intensity of collaboration on the variability of research quality', Research Policy, 34: 784-94.
50. Sargent, L. (2004) 'Careers and academic research collaborations: An inductive process framework for understanding successful collaborations', Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64: 308-19.
51. Sambunjak, D., Straus, S.E. and Marusic, A. (2006) 'Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review', Journal of the American Medical Association, 296: 1113-5.
52. Sands, R.G., Parson, L.A. and Duane, J. (1991) 'Faculty mentoring faculty in a public university', Journal of Higher Education, 62: 174-93.
53. Singh, J. (2005) 'Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns', Management Science, 51: 756-70.
54. Vecchio, R. (2002) 'Leadership and gender advantage', Leadership Quarterly, 13: 643-71.
55. Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N. and Malone, T. W. (2010) 'Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups', Science, 330/6004: 686-8.
56. Xie, Y. and Shauman, K. (1998) 'Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle', American Sociological Review, 63: 847-70.