Optimal Design and Purposeful Sampling: Complementary Methodologies for Implementation Research

Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 524-532

  Duan, Naihua ^a   Bhaumik, Dulal K ^b   Palinkas, Lawrence A ^c   Hoagwood, Kimberly ^d  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

A optimality; Mixed methods; Multiple aims; Optimal allocation; Purposeful sampling; Total survey error; Weighted A optimality

Indexed keywords

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY;

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84939548540     PISSN: 0894587X     EISSN: 15733289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10488-014-0596-7     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bellhouse, D. R. (1984). A review of optimal designs in survey sampling. The Canadian Journal of Statistics.,12, 53–65.
2. Berger, M. P. F., & Wong, W.-K. (Eds.). (2005). Applied optimal designs. New York: Wiley.
3. Bhaumik, D. K. (1993). On optimal block designs in the presence of a linear trend. Sankhya Series B,55(1), 91–102.
4. Bhaumik, D. K. (1995). Majorization and D-optimality under the nearest neighbor correlation model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B,57(1), 139–143.
5. Bhaumik, D. K., & Whittinghill, D. C. (1991). Optimality and robustness to the unavailability of blocks in block designs. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B,53(2), 399–407.
6. Goos, P., & Jones, B. (2011). Optimal design of experiments: A case study approach. New York: Wiley.
7. Groves, R. M., & Lyberg, L. (2010). Total survey error: Past, present, and future. Public Opinion Quarterly,74(5), 849–879.
8. Heiberger, R. M., Bhaumik, D. K., & Holland, B. (1993). Optimal data augmentation strategies for additive models. Journal of the American Statistical Association,88(423), 926–938.
9. Kiefer, J. (1959). Optimum experimental designs (with discussions). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodology),21, 272–319.
10. Liski, E. P., Mandal, N. K., Shah, K. R., & Sinha, B. K. (2002). Topics in optimal design. New York: Springer.
11. Murray, D. M., Varnell, S. P., & Blitstein, J. L. (2004). Design, analysis of group-randomized trials: A review of recent methodological developments. American Journal of Public Health,94(3), 423–432.
12. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2013). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health. doi:10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.
13. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
14. Raudenbush, S. W. (1997). Statistical analysis and optimal design for cluster-randomized trials. Psychological Methods,2, 173–185.
15. Raudenbush, S. W., & Liu, X. (2000). Statistical power and optimal design for multisite randomized trials. Psychological Methods,5(2), 199–213.
16. Raudenbush, S. W., Spybrook, J., Congdon, R., Liu, X., Martinez, A., Bloom, H., & Hill, C. (2011). Optimal design plus empirical evidence (Version 3.0). http://wtgrantfoundation.org/FocusAreas#tools-for-group-randomized-trials. Accessed 25 Oct 2014
17. Shah, K. R., & Sinha, B. K. (1989). Theory of optimal designs. New York: Springer.
18. Shirakura, T., & Tong, W.-P. (1996). Weighted A-optimality for fractional 2 m factorial designs of resolution V. Journal of Statistical Planning and inference,56, 243–256.
19. Spybrook, J., Bloom, H., Congdon, R., Hill, C., Martinez, A., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2011). Optimal design plus empirical evidence: Documentation for the “Optimal Design” software Version 3.0. http://wtgrantfoundation.org/FocusAreas#tools-for-group-randomized-trials. Accessed 25 Oct 2014