Completely digital two-visit immediately loaded implants: Proof of concept

Journal of Oral Implantology

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 429-436

  Schnitman, Paul A ^a,b   Han, Rita K ^b  

^a Dental Implants of Boston   (United States)

^b HARVARD SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

CAD CAM restoration milling; Completely digital implant and restoration; Computer planning; Digital implant dentistry; Immediate loading

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

CROWNS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; HUMANS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS;

EID: 84939547797     PISSN: 01606972     EISSN: 15481336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-15-00060     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Dye BA, Xianfen Li, Eugenio D. Beltrán-Aguilar. Selected Oral Health Indicators in the United States, 2005-2008. NCHS NHANES Data Brief No. 96; May 2012.
2. US Market for Dental Implants, Final Abutments and Computer Guided Surgery. British Columbia, iData Research Inc; 2015.
3. American Dental Association. Survey Center. Survey of Current Issues in Dentistry: Surgical Dental Implants, Amalgam Restoration, and Sedation. Chicago, Ill: American Dental Association; 2008.
4. D'Haese J, Van De Velde T, Komiyama A, Hultin M, De Bruyn H. Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:321-335.
5. Schneider D, Marquardt P, Zwahlen M, Jung RE. A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided template-based implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:73-86.
6. Ritter L, Reiz SD, Rothamel D, et al. Registration accuracy of three-dimensional surface and cone beam computed tomography data for virtual implant planning. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23:447-452.
7. Schneider D, Schober F, Grohmann P, Hammerle CHF, Jung RE. In-vitro evaluation of the tolerance of surgical instruments in templates for computer-assisted guided implantology produced by 3-D printing. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:320-325.
8. Cassetta M, Di Mambro A, Giansanti M, Stefanelli LV, Cavallini C. The intrinsic error of a stereolithographic surgical template in implant guided surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;42:264-275.
9. Koop R, Vercruyssen M, Vermeulen K, Quirynen M. Tolerance within the sleeve inserts of different surgical guides for guided implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:630-634.
10. Cassetta M. Accuracy of a computer-aided implant surgical technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013;33:317-325.
11. Park JM, Yi TK, Koak JY, Kim SK, Park EJ, Heo SJ. Comparison of five-axis milling and rapid prototyping for implant surgical templates. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:374-383.
12. D'Haese J, Van De Velde T, Elaut L, De Bruyn H. A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:293-303.