Older Adults' Recognition of Trade-Offs in Healthcare Decision-Making

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Volumn 63, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 1658-1662

  Case, Siobhan M ^a,b   O'Leary, John ^c   Kim, Nancy ^c   Tinetti, Mary E ^c   Fried, Terri R ^c,d  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d VA CONNECTICUT HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

chronic disease; decision making; trade offs

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE MODIFICATION; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECOGNITION; VETERAN; CLINICAL TRIAL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; MULTICENTER STUDY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; TERMINAL CARE;

AGED; CHRONIC DISEASE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HUMANS; MALE; TERMINAL CARE;

EID: 84939542275     PISSN: 00028614     EISSN: 15325415     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.13534     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Lorgunpai SJ, Grammas M, Lee DS, et al., Potential therapeutic competition in community-living older adults in the US: Use of medications that may adversely affect a coexisting condition. PLoS One 2014; 9: e89447.
2. Lee DH, Markwardt S, Goeres L, et al., Statins and physical activity in older men: The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174: 1263-1270.
3. Fried TR, O'Leary J, Towle V, et al., Health outcomes associated with polypharmacy in community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 2014; 62: 2261-2272.
4. Fried TR, Tinetti ME, Iannone L, et al., Health outcome prioritization as a tool for decision making among older persons with multiple chronic conditions. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171: 1854-1856.
5. Institute of Medicine. Dying in America: Improving and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2014.
6. Braddock CH III, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, et al., Informed decision making in outpatient practice: Time to get back to basics. JAMA 1999; 282: 2313-2320.
7. Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, et al., Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med 2005; 20: 531-535.
8. Case SM, Towle VR, Fried TR,. Considering the balance: Development of a scale to assess patient views on trade-offs in competing health outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 2013; 61: 1331-1336.
9. Fried TR, McGraw S, Agostini JV, et al., Views of older persons with multiple morbidities on competing outcomes and clinical decision-making. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008; 56: 1839-1844.
10. Reuben DB, Siu AL, Kimpau S,. The predictive validity of self-report and performance-based measures of function and health. J Gerontol 1992; 47: M106-M110.
11. Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Couper MP, Singer E, et al., Deficits and variations in patients' experience with making 9 common medical decisions: The DECISIONS Survey. Med Decis Making 2010; 30: 85S-95S.
12. Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Borus J, et al., Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 1556-1564.
13. Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, et al., Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: Implications for pay for performance. JAMA 2005; 294: 716-724.
14. Field MJ, Lohr KN,. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1990.
15. Carnett WG,. Clinical practice guidelines: A tool to improve care. Qual Manag Health Care 1999; 8: 13-21.
16. Djulbegovic B, Guyatt GH,. Evidence-based practice is not synonymous with delivery of uniform health care. JAMA 2014; 312: 1293-1294.
17. Montori VM, Brito J, Murad M,. The optimal practice of evidence-based medicine: Incorporating patient preferences in practice guidelines. JAMA 2013; 310: 2503-2504.