The bacterial proteogenomic pipeline

BMC Genomics

Volumn 15, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Uszkoreit, Julian ^a   Plohnke, Nicole ^b   Rexroth, Sascha ^b   Marcus, Katrin ^a   Eisenacher, Martin ^a  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^b RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GENETICS; BACTERIAL GENOME; BACTERIAL PROTEOGENOMICS; BRADYRHIZOBIUM JAPONICUM; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; GENETIC DATABASE; OPEN READING FRAME; PEPTIDE ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SYNECHOCYSTIS; BRADYRHIZOBIUM; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PROCEDURES; PROTEOMICS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); EUKARYOTA;

BACTERIAL PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BRADYRHIZOBIUM; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEOMICS; SYNECHOCYSTIS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 84939489580     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-S9-S19     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Wolters DA, Washburn MP, Yates JR: An automated multidimensional protein identification technology for shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem 2001; 73: 23-5683.
2. Renuse S, Chaerkady R, Pandey A: Proteogenomics. Proteomics 2011; 11: 4-620.
3. Küster B, Mortensen P, Andersen JS, Mann M: Mass spectrometry allows direct identification of proteins in large genomes. Proteomics 2001; 1: 5-641.
4. Fermin D, Allen BB, Blackwell TW, Menon R, Adamski M, Xu Y, Ulintz P, Omenn GS, States DJ: Novel gene and gene model detection using a whole genome open reading frame analysis in proteomics. Genome Biol 2006, 7(4):R35.
5. Bitton DA, Smith DL, Connolly Y, Scutt PJ, Miller CJ: An integrated massspectrometry pipeline identifies novel protein coding-regions in the human genome. PLoS One 2010, 5(1):e8949.
6. Risk BA, Spitzer WJ, Giddings MC: Peppy: proteogenomic search software. J Proteome Res 2013; 12: 6-3019.
7. Tovchigrechko A, Venepally P, Payne SH: PGP: parallel prokaryotic proteogenomics pipeline for MPI clusters, high-throughput batch clusters and multicore workstations. Bioinformatics 2014; 30: 10-1469.
8. Kumar D, Yadav AK, Kadimi PK, Nagaraj SH, Grimmond SM, Dash D:Proteogenomic analysis of Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA110 using GenoSuite, an automated multi-algorithmic pipeline. Mol Cell Proteomics 2013, 12(11):3388-3397.
9. Xu QW, Griss J, Wang R, Jones AR, Hermjakob H, Vizcaíno JA: jmzTab: A Java interface to the mzTab data standard. Proteomics 2014.
10. Elias JE, Gygi SP: Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat Methods 2007; 4: 3-207.
11. Käll L, Storey JD, MacCoss MJ, Noble WS: Assigning significance to peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry using decoy databases. J Proteome Res 2008; 7: 1-29.
12. Eng J, McCormack A, Yates J: An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 1994; 5: 11-976.
13. Kim S, Gupta N, Pevzner PA: Spectral probabilities and generating functions of tandem mass spectra: a strike against decoy databases. J Proteome Res 2008; 7: 8-3354.
14. Perkins DN, Pappin DJ, Creasy DM, Cottrell JS: Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 1999; 20: 18-3551.
15. Craig R, Beavis RC: TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 2004; 20: 9-1466.
16. Sturm M, Bertsch A, Gröpl C, Hildebrandt A, Hussong R, Lange E, Pfeifer N, Schulz-Trieglaff O, Zerck A, Reinert K, et al: OpenMS - an open-source software framework for mass spectrometry. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:163.
17. Koch M, Delmotte N, Rehrauer H, Vorholt JA, Pessi G, Hennecke H:Rhizobial adaptation to hosts, a new facet in the legume root-nodule symbiosis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2010, 23(6):784-790.
18. Jones AR, Siepen JA, Hubbard SJ, Paton NW: Improving sensitivity in proteome studies by analysis of false discovery rates for multiple search engines. Proteomics 2009; 9: 5, 1220-1229.