Clinical Risk Score to Predict Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreatoduodenectomy: Independent External Validation for Open and Laparoscopic Approaches

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Volumn 221, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 689-698

  Shubert, Christopher R ^a   Wagie, Amy E ^a   Farnell, Michael B ^a   Nagorney, David M ^a   Que, Florencia G ^a   Reid Lombardo, Kmarie ^a   Truty, Mark J ^a   Smoot, Rory L ^a   Kendrick, Michael L ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Abbreviations and Acronyms CRS PF clinical risk score for pancreatic fistula; EBL estimated blood loss; PD pancreatoduodenectomy; PF pancreatic fistula; POPF postoperative pancreatic fistula

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL RISK SCORE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EXTERNAL VALIDITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; PANCREAS DUCT; PANCREAS FISTULA; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PERCUTANEOUS DRAINAGE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL RISK; VALIDATION STUDY; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC FISTULA;

AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC FISTULA; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84939486094     PISSN: 10727515     EISSN: 18791190     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.05.011     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. G.G. Tsiotos, M.B. Farnell, and M.G. Sarr Are the results of pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer improving? World J Surg 23 1999 913 919
2. C.J. Yeo, J.L. Cameron, T.A. Sohn, and et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes Ann Surg 226 1997 248 260
3. th, D.W. Rattner, A.L. Warshaw, and et al. Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization Arch Surg 136 2001 391 398
4. D.J. Gouma, R.C. van Geenen, T.M. van Gulik, and et al. Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume Ann Surg 232 2000 786 795
5. S. Pedrazzoli, G. Liessi, C. Pasquali, and et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistulas: preventing severe complications and reducing reoperation and mortality rate Ann Surg 249 2009 97 104
6. Y. Vin, C.S. Sima, G.I. Getrajdman, and et al. Management and outcomes of postpancreatectomy fistula, leak, and abscess: results of 908 patients resected at a single institution between 2000 and 2005 J Am Coll Surg 207 2008 490 498
7. J.W. Lin, J.L. Cameron, C.J. Yeo, and et al. Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula J Gastrointest Surg 8 2004 951 959
8. W.B. Pratt, S.K. Maithel, T. Vanounou, and et al. Clinical and economic validation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification scheme Ann Surg 245 2007 443 451
9. Y.M. Yang, X.D. Tian, Y. Zhuang, and et al. Risk factors of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy World J Gastroenterol 11 2005 2456 2461
10. Q. Cheng, B. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and et al. Predictive factors for complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy J Surg Res 139 2007 22 29
11. Y.M. Choe, K.Y. Lee, C.A. Oh, and et al. Risk factors affecting pancreatic fistulas after pancreaticoduodenectomy World J Gastroenterol 14 2008 6970 6974
12. W.B. Pratt, M.P. Callery, and C.M. Vollmer Jr. Risk prediction for development of pancreatic fistula using the ISGPF classification scheme World J Surg 32 2008 419 428
13. C.R. Shubert, M.L. Kendrick, K.M. Thomsen, and et al. Identification of risk categories for in pancreaticoduodenectomy based on diagnosis HPB (Oxford) 17 2015 428 437
14. D.Y. Greenblatt, K.J. Kelly, V. Rajamanickam, and et al. Preoperative factors predict perioperative morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy Ann Surg Oncol 18 2011 2126 2135
15. P. Parikh, M. Shiloach, M.E. Cohen, and et al. Pancreatectomy risk calculator: an ACS-NSQIP resource HPB (Oxford) 12 2010 488 497
16. C. Are, C. Afuh, L. Ravipati, and et al. Preoperative nomogram to predict risk of perioperative mortality following pancreatic resections for malignancy J Gastrointest Surg 13 2009 2152 2162
17. J.S. Hill, Z. Zhou, J.P. Simons, and et al. A simple risk score to predict in-hospital mortality after pancreatic resection for cancer Ann Surg Oncol 17 2010 1802 1807
18. M.P. Callery, W.B. Pratt, T.S. Kent, and et al. A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy J Am Coll Surg 216 2013 1 14
19. B.C. Miller, J.D. Christein, S.W. Behrman, and et al. A Multi-Institutional External Validation of the Fistula Risk Score for Pancreatoduodenectomy J Gastrointest Surg 18 2014 172 180
20. Pancreas Club Calculator ISGPS leak definition. Available at: http://pancreasclub.com/calculators/isgps-calculator/. Accessed May 28, 2015.
21. T. Moriya, C.J. Clark, Y. Kirihara, and et al. Stenting and the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy Arch Surg 147 2012 35 40
22. U. Boggi, G. Amorese, F. Vistoli, and et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review Surg Endosc 29 2015 9 23
23. K.P. Croome, M.B. Farnell, F.G. Que, and et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with major vascular resection: a comparison of laparoscopic versus open approaches J Gastrointest Surg 19 2015 189 194 discussion 194
24. H.J. Asbun, and J.A. Stauffer Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the accordion severity grading system J Am Coll Surg 215 2012 810 819