Evaluation of the production and management of ecosystem services in urban parks of São Paulo;Avaliação em emergia como ferramenta de gestão nos parques urbanos de São Paulo

Gestao e Producao

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 443-458

  Mariano, Mirtes Vitoria ^a   De Almeida, Cecilia Maria Villas Bôas ^a   Bonilla, Silvia Helena ^a   Agostinho, Feni ^a   Giannetti, Biagio Fernando ^a  

^a PAULISTA UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Emergy; Environmental accounting; Environmental indicators; Urban parks

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939479908     PISSN: 0104530X     EISSN: 18069649     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/0104-530X712-13     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Akbari, H., Pomerantz, M., & Taha, H. (2001). Cool surfaces and shade trees to reduce energy use and improve air quality in urban areas. Solar Energy, 70(3), 295-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0038- 092X(00)00089-X.
2. Almeida, C. M. V. B., Barrella, F. A., & Giannetti, B. F. (2007). Emergetic ternary diagrams: five examples for application in environmental accounting for decision-making. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(1), 63-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.07.002.
3. Bolund, P., & Hunhammar, S. (1999). Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 29(2), 293-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0.
4. Brabec, E., Schulte, S., & Richards, P. L. (2002). Impervious surfaces and water quality: a review of current literature and its implications for watershed planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 16(4), 499-514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/088541202400903563.
5. Centro de Previsão de Tempo e Estudos Climáticos - CPTEC (2010). Índices pluviométrico. Recuperado em 02 de janeiro de 2011, de http://www.cptec.inpe.br
6. Centro de Referência para Energia Solar e Eólica Sergio Brito - CRESESB (2011). Insolação anual. Recuperado em 19 de março de 2011, de http://www.cresesb. cepel.br
7. Chen, W. Y., & Jim, C. Y. (2008). Assessment and valuation of the ecosystem services provided by urban forests. In M. M. Carreiro, Y.-C. Song & J. Wu (Eds.), Ecology, planning, and management of urban forests: international perspectives (pp. 53-83). New York: Springer.
8. Conway, T. M., & Urbani, L. (2007). Variations in municipal urban forestry policies: a case study of Toronto, Canada. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(3), 181-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.07.003.
9. Dang, X., & Liu, G. (2012). Emergy measures of carrying capacity and sustainability of a target region for an ecological restorations programme: a case study in Loess Hilly Region, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 102, 55-64. PMID:22425879
10. Demetrio, F. J. C. (2011). Avaliação da sustentabilidade do Brasil com a contabilidade em emergia (Tese de doutorado). Universidade Paulista, São Paulo.
11. Dimoudi, A., & Nikolopoulou, M. (2003). Vegetation in the urban environment: microclimatic analysis and benefits. Energy and Building, 35(1), 69-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00081-6.
12. Duan, N., Liu, X. D., Dai, J., Lin, C., Xia, X. H., Gao, R. Y., Wang, Y., Chen, S. Q., Yang, J., & Qi, J. (2011). Evaluating the environmental impacts of an urban wetland park based on emergy accounting and life cycle assessment: a case study in Beijing. Ecological Modelling, 222(2), 351-359.
13. Escobedo, F. J., Wagner, J. E., Nowak, D. J., De la Maza, C. L., Rodriguez, M., & Crane, D. E. (2008). Analyzing the cost effectiveness of Santiago, Chile's policy of using urban forests to improve air quality. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(1), 148-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.029. PMid:17275162
14. Giannetti, B. F., Barrela, F. A., & Almeida, C. M. V. B. (2006). A combined tool for environmental scientists and decision makers: ternary diagrams and emergy accounting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(2), 201-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.09.002.
15. Giannetti, B. F., Ogura, Y., Bonilla, S. H., & Almeida, C. M. V. B. (2011). Emergy assessment of a coffee farm in Brazilian Cerrado considerering form the environmental services, negative externalities and fair price. Agricultural Systems, 104(9), 679-688.
16. Google (2012). Google earth. Recuperado em 04 de julho de 2012, de http://earth.google.com
17. Higgins, J. B. (2003). Emergy analysis of the Oak Openings region. Ecological Engineering, 21(1), 75-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2003.09.007.
18. Huang, S. L., Wang, S. H., & Budd, W. W. (2009). Sprawl in Taipei"s peri-urban zone: responses to spatial planning and implication for adapting global environmental change. Landascape and Urban Planning, 90(1-2), 20-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.010.
19. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - IBGE. Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão (2011). Cidades. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE. Recuperado em 2 de novembro de 2011, de http://www.ibge.gov.br/cidadesat/topwindow.html
20. Kliass, R. G. (1993). Parques urbanos de São Paulo. São Paulo: PINI. 211 p.
21. Lin, W., Wu, T., Zhang, C., & Yu, T. (2011). Carbon savings resulting from the cooling effect of green areas: a case study in Beijing. Environmental Pollution, 159(8-9), 2148-2154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.02.035. PMid:21444136
22. Lu, H. F., Campbell, D. E., Li, Z. A, & Ren, H. (2005). Emergy synthesis of an agro-forest restoration system in lower subtropical China. Ecological Engineering, 27, 175-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.12.002.
23. McPherson, E. G., & Simpson, J. R. (2002). A comparison of municipal forest benefits and costs in Modesto and Santa Monica, California, USA. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 1(2), 61-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1078/1618-8667-00007.
24. McPherson, G., Simpson, J. R., Peper, P. J., Maco, S. E., & Xiao, Q. (2005). Municipal forest benefits and costs in five US cities. Journal of Forestry, 103, 411-416.
25. Meyer, W. B., & Turner, B. L. (1994). Changes in land use and land cover: a global perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Millward A. A., & Sabir S. (2011). Benefits of a forested urban park: what is the value of Allan Gardens to the city of Toronto, Canada? Landscape and Urban Planning, 100, 177-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.11.013.
27. Nowak, D. J., & Dwyer, J. F. (2000). Understanding the benefits and costs of urban forest ecosystems. In J. E. Kuser (Ed.), Handbook of urban and community forestry in the Northeast (pp. 11-25). New York: Kluwer Academic.
28. Odum, H. T. (1996). Environmental accounting: emergy and decision making. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 370 p.
29. Odum, H. T., Doherty, S. J., Scatena, F. N., & Kharecha, P. (2000). Emergy evaluation of reforestation alternatives in Puerto Rico. Forest Science, 46(4), 521-530.
30. Oliveira, S., Andrade, H., & Vaz, T. (2011). The cooling effect of green spaces as a contribution to the mitigation of urban heat: A case study in Lisbon. Building and Environment, 46(11), 2186-2194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.04.034.
31. Qin, P., Wong, Y. S., & Tam, N. F. Y. (2000). Emergy evaluation of Mai Po mangrove marshes. Ecological Engineering, 16(2), 271-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(00)00104-X.
32. Rosenfeld, A. H., Akbari, H., Bretz, S., Fishman, B. L., Kurn, D. M., Sailor, D., & Taha, H. (1995). Mitigation of urban heat islands: materials, utility programs, updates. Energy and Building, 22(3), 255-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-7788(95)00927-P.
33. Secretaria do Verde e Meio Ambiente - SVMA (2010). Sâo Paulo: Parques. Recuperado em 18 de março de 2010, de http://www.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/cidade/secretarias/meio-ambiente/
34. Silva, L. O. (1993). Subsídios para formulação de uma política para áreas verdes no Município de São Paulo. In A. Phillipi Jr. (Ed.), A questão ambiental urbana: cidade de São Paulo (pp. 425-449). São Paulo: SVMA.
35. Su, C., Fu, B., He, C., & Lü Y. (2012). Variation of ecosystem services and human activities: a case study in the Yanhe Watershed of China. Acta Oecologica, 44, 46-57.
36. Tilley, D. R., & Swank, W. T. (2003). Emergy-based environmental systems assessment of a multi-purpose temperate mixed-forest watershed of the southern Appalachian Mountains, USA. Journal of Environmental Management, 69(3), 213-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.08.002. PMid:14580723
37. Ton, S., Odum, H. T., & Delfino, J. (1998). Ecological-economic evaluation of wetland management alternatives. Ecological Engineering, 11, 291-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(98)00039-1.
38. Ukidwe, N. U., & Bakshi, B. R. (2005). Flow of natural versus economic capital in industrial supply networks and its implications to sustainability. Environmental Science & Technology, 39(24), 9759-9769. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es050627n. PMid:16475364
39. Ulgiati, S., Zucaro, A., & Franzese, P. P. (2010). Shared wealth or nobody's land? The worth of natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 70(4):778-787. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.11.015.
40. Xiao, Q., & McPherson, E. G. (2002). Rainfall interception by Santa Monica's municipal urban forest. Urban Ecology, 6(4), 291-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:UECO.0000004828.05143.67.
41. Xiao, Q., McPherson, E. G., Simpson, J. R., & Ustin, S. L. (1998). Rainfall interception by Sacramento's urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture, 24, 235-244.
42. Zhao, S., Da, L., Tang, Z., Fang, H., Song, K., & Fang, J. (2006). Ecological consequences of rapid urban expansion: Shangai, China. Research Communications, 4(7), 341-346.