Assessing the Potential Impacts of Connected Vehicles: Mobility, Environmental, and Safety Perspectives

Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Technology, Planning, and Operations

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 229-243

  Olia, Arash ^a   Abdelgawad, Hossam ^b,c   Abdulhai, Baher ^b   Razavi, Saiedeh N ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c CAIRO UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Connected Vehicle; Microsimulation; Mobility; Safety; V2V

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ADVANCED TRAVELER INFORMATION SYSTEMS; AMPHIBIOUS VEHICLES; CARRIER MOBILITY; CRASHWORTHINESS; ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GAS EMISSIONS; GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM; GREENHOUSE GASES; MOBILE DEVICES; TRAFFIC SIGNS; TRANSPORTATION; VARIABLE MESSAGE SIGNS; VEHICLES;

ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENTS; MICROSIMULATION; SOURCES OF INFORMATIONS; TRAFFIC MICRO SIMULATIONS; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; V2V; VARIABLE MESSAGE SIGN (VMS);

VEHICLE TO VEHICLE COMMUNICATIONS;

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; COMMUNICATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GPS; GREENHOUSE GAS; INFORMATION; MOBILITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SAFETY; SIMULATION; TRANSPORT VEHICLE; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM;

CANADA; ONTARIO [CANADA]; TORONTO;

EID: 84939196916     PISSN: 15472450     EISSN: 15472442     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15472450.2015.1062728     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. J.Archer,, & I.Kosonen, (2000). The potential of microsimulation modelling in relation to traffic safety assessment. Paper presented at the ESS Conference, September, Hamburg, Germany. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Iisakki_Kosonen/publication/228881237_The_potential_of_micro-simulation_modelling_in_relation_to_traffic_safety_assessment/links/0c96053c3a9d575feb000000.pdf
2. J.Archer,, & W.Young, (2009). Signal treatments to reduce heavy vehicle crash-risk at metropolitan highway intersections. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41, 404–411.
3. C.Bachman,, J.R.Matthew,, & B.Abdulhai, (2012). Improved time-to-collision definition for simulating traffic conflicts on truck-only infrastructure. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2237, 31–40.
4. J.Barceló,, A.-G.Dumont,, L.Montero,, & J.Perarnau, (2003). Safety indicators for microsimulation based assessments. CD-ROM. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, January, Washington, DC.
5. M.Barth,, & G.Scora, (2006). Comprehensive modal emission model (CMEM). Version 3.01 user's guide. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
6. P.Bonsall,, R.Liu,, & W.Young,. (2005). Modelling safety-related driving behavior impact of parameter values. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39, 425–444.
7. M.Brian, (2011). Commuting in United States. Publication ACS 15. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
8. Canada's Emission Trend. (2012). Publication En 84-83/2012E. Environment Canada.
9. F.Cunto,, & F.F.Saccomanno, (2009). Simulated safety performance of rear-end and angled vehicle interactions at isolated intersections. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 36, 1794–1803.
10. H.Dia,, & P.Sakda, (2007). Modelling drivers' compliance and route choice behavior in response to travel information. Nonlinear Dynamics, 49 (4), 493–509.
11. F.Dion,, J.-S.Oh,, & R.Robinson, (2011). Virtual testbed for assessing probe vehicle data in IntelliDrive systems, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 12, 635–644.
12. S.El-Tantawy,, S.Djavadian,, M.J.Roorda,, & B.Abdulhai, (2009). Safety evaluation of truck lane restriction strategies using microsimulation modeling. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2099Retrieved from http://trrjournalonline.trb.org/doi/abs/10.3141/2099-14
13. L.Frederic,, J.Robert,, I.Richer,, & J.Bergeron, (2009). Passion for driving and aggressive driving behavior: A look at their relationship. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 3020–3043.
14. N.J.Goodall,, L.S.Brian,, & Byungkyu. (2013). Traffic signal control with connected vehicles. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2381(1), 65–72.
15. N.J.Goodall,, L.S.Brian,, & P.Byungkyu,. (2014). Microscopic estimation of freeway vehicle positions from the behavior of connected vehicles. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/15472450.2014.889926
16. F.Huguenin,, & A.Torday, (2005). Evaluation of traffic safety using microsimulation. Paper presented at the the 5th Swiss Transport Research Conference, STRC, Ascona, Switzerland.
17. M.Islam,, M.Hadiuzzaman,, J.Fang,, T.Qiu,, & K.El-Basyouny, (2013). Assessing mobility and safety impacts of a variable speed limit control strategy. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2364(2013), 1–11.
18. F.P.Jeffrey,. (2004). Reducing aggressive driving and optimizing throughput at work zone merges in Michigan. Publication FHWA-HOP-04-033. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. Retrieved from http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/wz/technologies/michigan/michigan.pdf
19. E.Jeong,, C.Oh,, G.Lee,, & H.Cho, (2014). Safety impacts of intervehicle warning information Systems for moving hazards in connected vehicle environments. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2424, 1119.
20. B.Joe,. (2008). Surrogate safety assessment model (SSAM): Software user manual. Publication FHWA-HRT-08-050. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation.
21. L.Kattan,, M.Moussavi,, B.Far,, C.Harschnitz,, & A.Radmanesh,. (2012). Microsimulation evaluation of the potential impacts of vehicle-to-vehicle communication (V2V) in disseminating warning information under high incident occurrence conditions. International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research, 10 (3), 137–147.
22. J.Lee,, & Park, B. (2008). Evaluation of route guidance strategies based on vehicle-infrastructure integration under incident conditions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2086(1), 107–114.
23. J.Lee,, & B.Park, (2013). Evaluation of variable speed limit under connected vehicle environment. Paper presented at the 2013 International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE), IEEE.
24. T.Martin, (2011). Commuting to work: Results of the 2010 general social survey. Publication 11-008-X. Statistics Canada. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-008-x/2011002/article/11531-eng.pdf
25. M.Minderhoud,, & P.Bovy, (2001). Extended time to collision measures for road traffic safety assessment. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 33, 89–97.
26. J.-S.Oh,, & R.Jayakrishnan, (2002). Emergence of private advanced traveler information system providers and their effect on traffic network performance. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1783(1), 167–177.
27. A.Olia,, B.Abdulhai,, H.Abdeljawad,, & S.Razavi, (2014). Assessing the potential impacts of connected vehicles: Mobility, environmental, and safety perspectives. Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting, number 14-2348. Retrieved from http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1288277
28. A.Olia,, W.Genders,, & S.N.Razavi, (2013). Microsimulation-based impact assessment of the vehicle-to-vehicle system for work zone safety. Paper presented at the CSCE Conference, Montreal, Canada.
29. A.Olia,, P.Izadpanah,, & S.N.Razavi, (2012). Construction work zone traffic management using connected vehicles systems. Paper presented at the CSCE Conference, June, Edmonton, Canada.
30. E.L.Paikari,, S.T.Kattan,, & B.H.Far, (2013). Modeling and simulation of advisory speed and re-routing strategies in connected vehicles systems for crash risk and travel time reduction. Paper presented at the 26th Annual IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE), May, 1–4.
31. E.Paikari,, T.Shahram,, & F.Behrouz, (2014). A simulation-based benefit analysis of deploying connected vehicles using dedicated short range communication. Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Proceedings, IEEE, 980–985.
32. B.Park,, & J.Lee, (2008). Evaluation of vehicle infrastructure integration (VII) based route guidance strategies under incident conditions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2086, 107–115.
33. Traffic safety facts. (2013). DOT HS 811856. Retrieved from http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811856.pdf
34. R.Tudela,, J.A.Aldo,, & S.Alexander,. (2014). Queue spillback detection and signal control strategies based on connected vehicle technology in a congested network. Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting, no. 14–5565, January, Washington DC.
35. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2013). Transportation sector emissions. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/sources/transportation.html
36. A.R.A.Van der Horst, (1991). Time-to-collision as a cue for decision-making in braking. Vision in Vehicles, 3, 19–26.