Tunable lotus-leaf and rose-petal effects via graphene paper origami

Extreme Mechanics Letters

Volumn 4, Issue , 2015, Pages 18-25

  Cao, Changyong ^a,b   Feng, Yaying ^a   Zang, Jianfeng ^a,c   López, Gabriel P ^a,b   Zhao, Xuanhe ^a,d  

^a Duke University   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^d Massachusetts Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Graphene paper; Lotus leaf effect; Origami; Rose petal effect; Superhydrophobicity; Tunable adhesion

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; CONTACT ANGLE; COST EFFECTIVENESS; DROPS; ELASTOMERS; GOLD COATINGS; GRAPHENE; METALLIC FILMS; WETTING;

GRAPHENE PAPERS; LOTUS LEAF; ORIGAMI; PETAL EFFECTS; SUPERHYDROPHOBICITY;

SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

EID: 84939142915     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23524316     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eml.2015.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Barthlott W., Neinhuis C. Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 1997, 202.
2. Feng L., et al. Petal effect: A superhydrophobic state with high adhesive force. Langmuir 2008, 24(8):4114-4119.
3. Zhang X., et al. Superhydrophobic surfaces: from structural control to functional application. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18(6):621-633.
4. Dawood M., et al. Mimicking both petal and lotus effects on a single silicon substrate by tuning the wettability of nanostructured surfaces. Langmuir 2011, 27(7):4126-4133.
5. Yan Y., Gao N., Barthlott W. Mimicking natural superhydrophobic surfaces and grasping the wetting process: A review on recent progress in preparing superhydrophobic surfaces. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 169(2):80-105.
6. Howarter J.A., Youngblood J.P. Self-cleaning and anti-fog surfaces via stimuli-responsive polymer brushes. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19(22):3838-3843.
7. Lee H., Lee B.P., Messersmith P.B. A reversible wet/dry adhesive inspired by mussels and geckos. Nature 2007, 448(7151):338-341.
8. Orner B.P., et al. Arrays for the combinatorial exploration of cell adhesion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126(35):10808-10809.
9. Dorrer C., Rühe J. Wetting of silicon nanograss: From superhydrophilic to superhydrophobic surfaces. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20(1):159-163.
10. Cao C., et al. Harnessing localized ridges for high-aspect-ratio hierarchical patterns with dynamic tunability and multifunctionality. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26(11):1763-1770.
11. Balu B., et al. Tunability of the adhesion of water drops on a superhydrophobic paper surface via selective plasma etching. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2009, 23(2):361-380.
12. Lai Y., et al. Designing superhydrophobic porous nanostructures with tunable water adhesion. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21(37):3799-3803.
13. Rahmawan Y., Xu L., Yang S. Self-assembly of nanostructures towards transparent, superhydrophobic surfaces. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1(9):2955-2969.
14. Ding Y.-H., et al. Surface adhesion properties of graphene and graphene oxide studied by colloid-probe atomic force microscopy. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 258(3):1077-1081.
15. Mahadevan L., Rica S. Self-organized origami. Science 2005, 307(5716):1740.
16. Zang J., et al. Multifunctionality and control of the crumpling and unfolding of large-area graphene. Nature Mater. 2013, 12(4):321-325.
17. Zang J., et al. Stretchable and high-performance supercapacitors with crumpled graphene papers. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4:6492.
18. Kim P., et al. Tunable optical diffuser based on deformable wrinkles rational design of mechano-responsive optical materials by fine tuning the evolution of strain-dependent wrinkling patterns. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2013, 1:381-388.
19. Liu Y., et al. Three-dimensional folding of pre-strained polymer sheets via absorption of laser light. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 115(20):204911.
20. Efimenko K., et al. Nested self-similar wrinkling patterns in skins. Nature Mater. 2005, 4(4):293-297.
21. Lin P.-C., Yang S. Spontaneous formation of one-dimensional ripples in transit to highly ordered two-dimensional herringbone structures through sequential and unequal biaxial mechanical stretching. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90(24):241903.
22. Lin P.-C., Yang S. Mechanically switchable wetting on wrinkled elastomers with dual-scale roughness. Soft Matter 2009, 5(5):1011-1018.
23. Li B., et al. Mechanics of morphological instabilities and surface wrinkling in soft materials: a review. Soft Matter 2012, 8(21):5728-5745.
24. Dikin D.A., et al. Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide paper. Nature 2007, 448(7152):457-460.
25. Park S., et al. Hydrazine-reduction of graphite- and graphene oxide. Carbon 2011, 49(9):3019-3023.
26. Sun J.-Y., et al. Folding wrinkles of a thin stiff layer on a soft substrate. Proc. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2012, 468(2140):932-953.
27. Chen D., et al. Surface energy as a barrier to creasing of elastomer films: An elastic analogy to classical nucleation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109(3):038001.
28. Wang Q., Zhao X. A three-dimensional phase diagram of growth-induced surface instabilities. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5(8887).
29. Shu Y., Krishnacharya K., Pei-Chun L. Harnessing surface wrinkle patterns in soft matter. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20(16):2550-2564.
30. Callies M., Quéré D. On water repellency. Soft Matter 2005, 1(1):55-61.
31. Whyman G., Bormashenko E., Stein T. The rigorous derivation of Young, Cassie-Baxter and Wenzel equations and the analysis of the contact angle hysteresis phenomenon. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 450(4-6):355-359.
32. Tian S., et al. Robust adhesion of flower-like few-layer graphene nanoclusters. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2.
33. Chen Z., et al. Superhydrophobic graphene-based materials: Surface construction and functional applications. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25(37):5352-5359.
34. Feng H., et al. A low-temperature method to produce highly reduced graphene oxide. Nature Commun. 2013, 4:1539.
35. Sun X.-Y., et al. Anisotropic vacancy-defect-induced fracture strength loss of graphene. RSC Adv. 2015, 5(18):13623-13627.
36. Cassie A., Baxter S. Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1944, 40:546-551.
37. Checco A., et al. Collapse and reversibility of the superhydrophobic state on nanotextured surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 112(21):216101.
38. Checco A., Rahman A., Black C.T. Robust superhydrophobicity in large-area nanostructured surfaces defined by block-copolymer self assembly. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26(6):886-891.
39. Shreshta J., et al. Adaptive wettability-enhanced surfaces ordered on molded etched substrates using shrink film. Smart Mater. Struct. 2013, 22(1):014014.
40. Lai Y., et al. In situ surface-modification-induced superhydrophobic patterns with reversible wettability and adhesion. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25(12):1682-1686.
41. Cao Y., Hutchinson J.W. Wrinkling phenomena in neo-Hookean film/substrate bilayers. J. Appl. Mech. 2012, 79(3):031019.