Meta-analyses triggered by previous (false-)significant findings: Problems and solutions

Systematic Reviews

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Schuit, Ewoud ^a,b,c   Roes, Kit C B ^a   Mol, Ben W J ^d   Kwee, Anneke ^a   Moons, Karel G M ^a   Groenwold, Rolf H H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bias; Meta analysis; Power; Type I error

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); NULL HYPOTHESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLE SIZE; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL BIAS; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; THERAPEUTIC ERROR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PUBLISHING; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; PUBLICATION BIAS;

EID: 84939139109     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20464053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-015-0048-9     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Riley RD, Lambert PC, bo-Zaid G. Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting. BMJ. 2010;340:c221.
2. Simmonds MC, Higgins JP, Stewart LA, Tierney JF, Clarke MJ, Thompson SG. Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice. Clin Trials. 2005;2(3):209-17.
3. Pereira TV, Horwitz RI, Ioannidis JP. Empirical evaluation of very large treatment effects of medical interventions. JAMA. 2012;308(16):1676-84.
4. Ioannidis JP. Why most discovered true associations are inflated. Epidemiology. 2008;19(5):640-8.
5. Pereira TV, Ioannidis JP. Statistically significant meta-analyses of clinical trials have modest credibility and inflated effects. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(10):1060-9.
6. Zollner S, Pritchard JK. Overcoming the winner's curse: estimating penetrance parameters from case-control data. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;80(4):605-15.
7. Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005;2(8):e124.
8. Ioannidis JP. Effect of formal statistical significance on the credibility of observational associations. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168(4):374-83.
9. Kjaergard LL, Villumsen J, Gluud C. Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(11):982-9.
10. Pogue J, Yusuf S. Overcoming the limitations of current meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 1998;351(9095):47-52.
11. Wetterslev J, Thorlund K, Brok J, Gluud C. Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(1):64-75.
12. Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, Schulz KF, Juni P, Altman DG, et al. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ. 2008;336(7644):601-5.
13. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177-88.
14. Barr DR, Sherrill ET. Mean and variance of truncated normal distributions. Am Stat. 1999;53(4):357-61.
15. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; 2014. URL http://www. R-project.org/.
16. Cornell JE, Mulrow CD, Localio R, Stack CB, Meibohm AR, Guallar E, et al. Random-effects meta-analysis of inconsistent effects: a time for change. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(4):267-70.