An integrated artificial neural network model for the landslide susceptibility assessment of Osado Island, Japan

Natural Hazards

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 1749-1776

  Dou, Jie ^a   Yamagishi, Hiromitsu ^b   Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza ^c   Yunus, Ali P ^a   Song, Xuan ^a   Xu, Yueren ^d   Zhu, Zhongfan ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b Asian Institute of Space Information   (Japan)

^c SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^d INSTITUTE OF GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^e BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

AUC; BPNN; Certainty factor; Landslide susceptibility; Osado Island

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BACK PROPAGATION; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; GEOLOGICAL SURVEY; GIS; INTEGRATED APPROACH; LANDSLIDE; SLOPE ANGLE;

CHUBU; HONSHU; JAPAN; NIIGATA; SADO ISLAND;

EID: 84938990369     PISSN: 0921030X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-015-1799-2     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aleotti P, Chowdhury R (1999) Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. Bull Eng Geol Environ 58:21–44. doi:10.1007/s100640050066
2. Arora MK, Das Gupta AS, Gupta RP (2004) An artificial neural network approach for landslide hazard zonation in the Bhagirathi (Ganga) Valley, Himalayas. Int J Remote Sens 25:559–572. doi:10.1080/0143116031000156819
3. Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65:15–31. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.06.010
4. Ayalew L, Yamagishi H, Marui H, Kanno T (2005) Landslides in Sado Island of Japan: part I. Case studies, monitoring techniques and environmental considerations. Eng Geol 81:419–431
5. Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol Sci J 24:43–69
6. Binaghi E, Luzi L, Madella P et al (1998) Slope instability zonation: a comparison between certainty factor and fuzzy Dempster–Shafer approaches. Nat Hazards 17:77–97. doi:10.1023/A:1008001724538
7. Brabb EE (1984) Innovative approaches to landslide hazard mapping. Proc 4th Int Symp Landslides 1:307–324
8. Chang T-C, Chao R-J (2006) Application of back-propagation networks in debris flow prediction. Eng Geol 85:270–280. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.02.007
9. Chauhan S, Sharma M, Arora MK, Gupta NK (2010) Landslide susceptibility zonation through ratings derived from artificial neural network. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 12:340–350. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2010.04.006
10. Chung C-J, Fabbri AG (1993) The representation of geoscience information for data integration. Nonrenewable Resour 2:122–139. doi:10.1007/BF02272809
11. Conforti M, Pascale S, Robustelli G, Sdao F (2014) Evaluation of prediction capability of the artificial neural networks for mapping landslide susceptibility in the Turbolo River catchment (northern Calabria, Italy). Catena 113:236–250. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2013.08.006
12. Dou J, Qian J, Zhang H et al (2009) Landslides detection: a case study in Conghua city of Pearl River delta. Second Int Conf Earth Obs Glob Chang. doi:10.1117/12.836328
13. Dou J, Oguchi T, Hayakawa YS et al (2014) Susceptibility mapping using a certainty factor model and its validation in the Chuetsu area, Central Japan. Landslide Sci Safer Geoenviron 2:483–489. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05050-8_65
14. Dou J, Chang K, Chen S et al (2015a) Automatic case-based reasoning approach for landslide detection: integration of object-oriented image analysis and a genetic algorithm. Remote Sens. doi:10.3390/rs70404318
15. Dou J, Li X, Yunus AP et al (2015b) Automatic detection of sinkhole collapses at finer resolutions using a multi-component remote sensing approach. Nat Hazards 26:1–24. doi:10.1007/s11069-015-1756-0
16. Dou J, Paudel U, Oguchi T et al (2015c) Differentiation of shallow and deep-seated landslides using support vector machines: a case study of the Chuetsu area, Japan. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 26:227–239. doi:10.3319/TAO.2014.12.02.07(EOSI)
17. Falaschi F, Giacomelli F, Federici PR et al (2009) Logistic regression versus artificial neural networks: landslide susceptibility evaluation in a sample area of the Serchio River valley, Italy. Nat Hazards 50:551–569
18. Farrokhzad F, Barari A, Choobbasti AJ, Ibsen LB (2011) Neural network-based model for landslide susceptibility and soil longitudinal profile analyses: two case studies. J African Earth Sci 61:349–357. doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2011.09.004
19. Feizizadeh B, Jankowski P, Blaschke T (2014) A GIS based spatially-explicit sensitivity and uncertainty analysis approach for multi-criteria decision analysis. Comput Geosci 64:81–95. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2013.11.009
20. Gessler PE, Moore ID, McKenzie NJ, Ryan PJ (1995) Soil-landscape modelling and spatial prediction of soil attributes. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 9:421–432
21. Gökceoglu C, Aksoy H (1996) susceptibility mapping of the slopes in the residual soils of the Mengen region (Turkey) by deterministic stability analyses and image processing techniques. Eng Geol 44:147–161
22. Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31:181–216. doi:10.1016/S0169-555x(99)00078-1
23. Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H (1989) Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw 2:359–366
24. Kanungo DP, Arora MK, Sarkar S, Gupta RP (2006) A comparative study of conventional, ANN black box, fuzzy and combined neural and fuzzy weighting procedures for landslide susceptibility zonation in Darjeeling Himalayas. Eng Geol 85:347–366. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.03.004
25. Kanungo DP, Sarkar S, Sharma S (2011) Combining neural network with fuzzy, certainty factor and likelihood ratio concepts for spatial prediction of landslides. Nat Hazards 59:1491–1512. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9847-z
26. Klimes J (2013) Landslide temporal analysis and susceptibility assessment as bases for landslide mitigation, Machu Picchu, Peru. Environ Earth Sci 70:913–925. doi:10.1007/s12665-012-2181-2
27. Li Y, Chen G, Tang C et al (2012) Rainfall and earthquake-induced landslide susceptibility assessment using GIS and artificial neural network. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:2719–2729. doi:10.5194/nhess-12-2719-2012
28. Miliaresis G, Kokkas N (2007) Segmentation and object-based classification for the extraction of the building class from LIDAR DEMs. Comput Geosci 33:1076–1087. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2006.11.012
29. Nefeslioglu HA, Sezer EA, Gokceoglu C, Ayas Z (2013) A modified analytical hierarchy process (M-AHP) approach for decision support systems in natural hazard assessments. Comput Geosci 59:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2013.05.010
30. Oguchi T (1997) Drainage density and relative relief in humid steep mountains with frequent slope failure. Earth Surf Process Landforms 22:107–120
31. Park S, Choi C, Kim B, Kim J (2012) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, analytic hierarchy process, logistic regression, and artificial neural network methods at the Inje area, Korea. Environ Earth Sci 68:1443–1464. doi:10.1007/s12665-012-1842-5
32. Pavel M, Nelson JD, Jonathan Fannin R (2011) An analysis of landslide susceptibility zonation using a subjective geomorphic mapping and existing landslides. Comput Geosci 37:554–566. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2010.10.006
33. Pourghasemi HR, Mohammady M, Pradhan B (2012) Landslide susceptibility mapping using index of entropy and conditional probability models in GIS: safarood Basin. Iran. Catena 97:71–84. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2012.05.005
34. Pourghasemi H, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C, Moezzi KD (2013) A comparative assessment of prediction capabilities of Dempster–Shafer and weights-of-evidence models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk 4:93–118. doi:10.1080/19475705.2012.662915
35. Pradhan B, Lee S, Buchroithner MF (2010) A GIS-based back-propagation neural network model and its cross-application and validation for landslide susceptibility analyses. Comput Environ Urban Syst 34:216–235. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.12.004
36. Prasad R, Pandey A, Singh KP et al (2012) Retrieval of spinach crop parameters by microwave remote sensing with back propagation artificial neural networks: a comparison of different transfer functions. Adv Sp Res 50:363–370. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2012.04.010
37. Rumelhart D, Hinton G, Williams R (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323:533–536
38. Shi H-Y, Lee K-T, Lee H-H et al (2012) Comparison of artificial neural network and logistic regression models for predicting in-hospital mortality after primary liver cancer surgery. PLoS ONE 7:e35781. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035781
39. Shortliffe EH (1976) Computer-based medical consultations: MYCIN. North-Holland, New York
40. Song JH, Venkatesh SS, Conant EA et al (2005) Comparative analysis of logistic regression and artificial neural network for computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses. Acad Radiol 12:487–495. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2004.12.016
41. Sumer E, Turker M (2013) An adaptive fuzzy-genetic algorithm approach for building detection using high-resolution satellite images. Comput Environ Urban Syst 39:48–62. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.01.004
42. Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240:1285–1293
43. Tien Bui D, Pradhan B, Lofman O et al (2012) Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam: a comparison of the Levenberg–Marquardt and Bayesian regularized neural networks. Geomorphology 171–172:12–29. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.04.023
44. Turner AK, Schuster R (1996) Landslides: investigation and mitigation. Transp. Res. Board, Washington, DC
45. Vahidnia MH, Alesheikh AA, Alimohammadi A, Hosseinali F (2010) A GIS-based neuro-fuzzy procedure for integrating knowledge and data in landslide susceptibility mapping. Comput Geosci 36:1101–1114. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2010.04.004
46. Van Westen CJ, Rengers N, Terlien MTJ, Soeters R (1997) Prediction of the occurrence of slope instability phenomenal through GIS-based hazard zonation. Geol Rundschau 86:404–414. doi:10.1007/s005310050149
47. Yamagishi H (2008) GIS mapping of landscape and disasters of Sado Island, Japan. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XXXVII:1429–1432 (Part B7, Beijing 2008)
48. Yesilnacar E, Topal T (2005) Landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek region (Turkey). Eng Geol 79:251–266. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.02.002
49. Yilmaz I (2009) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: a case study from Kat landslides (Tokat—Turkey). Comput Geosci 35:1125–1138. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2008.08.007
50. Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Pourghasemi HR, Abdullahi S (2015) Landslide susceptibility assessment at Wadi Jawrah Basin, Jizan region, Saudi Arabia using two bivariate models in GIS. Geosci J doi:10.1007/s12303-014-0065-z
51. Zare M, Pourghasemi HR, Vafakhah M, Pradhan B (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping at Vaz Watershed (Iran) using an artificial neural network model: a comparison between multilayer perceptron (MLP) and radial basic function (RBF) algorithms. Arab J Geosci 6:2873–2888. doi:10.1007/s12517-012-0610-x