Reintroduction of Tasmanian devils to mainland Australia can restore top-down control in ecosystems where dingoes have been extirpated

Biological Conservation

Volumn 191, Issue , 2015, Pages 428-435

  Hunter, Daniel O ^a   Britz, Thomas ^a   Jones, Menna ^b   Letnic, Mike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Dingoes; Predator diversity; Rewilding; Tasmanian devils; Trophic cascades

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BIODIVERSITY; CANID; COGNITION; ENDANGERED SPECIES; EXTINCTION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; LIVESTOCK; PREDATOR; REINTRODUCTION; SPECIES DIVERSITY; TOP-DOWN CONTROL; TROPHIC CASCADE; VULNERABILITY;

AUSTRALIA; TASMANIA;

CANIDAE; CANIS FAMILIARIS DINGO; MAMMALIA; SARCOPHILUS HARRISII;

EID: 84938795362     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.07.030     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Allen L.R. Demographic and functional responses of wild dogs to poison baiting. Ecol. Manag. Restor. 2015, 16(1):58-66.
2. Allen B.L., Allen L.R., Leung L.K.-P. Interactions between two naturalised invasive predators in Australia: are feral cats suppressed by dingoes?. Biol. Invasions 2015, 17(2):761-776. (Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10530-014-0767-1 [Accessed April 1, 2015]).
3. Brook L.A., Johnson C.N., Ritchie E.G. Effects of predator control on behaviour of an apex predator and indirect consequences for mesopredator suppression C. Dickman, ed. J. Appl. Ecol. 2012, 49(6):1278-1286. (Available at:http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02207.x).
4. Brüniche-Olsen A., et al. Extensive population decline in the Tasmanian devil predates European settlement and devil facial tumour disease. Biol. Lett. 2014, 10(11):20140619.
5. Claridge, et al. Trends in the activity levels of forest-dwelling vertebrate fauna against a background of intensive baiting for foxes. For. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 260(5):11. (Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112710003233).
6. Colman N.J., et al. Lethal control of an apex predator has unintended cascading effects on forest mammal assemblages. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2014, 281(1782):20133094. (Available at: http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/281/1782/20133094.full).
7. Dambacher J.M., Li H.W., Rossignol P.A. Qualitative predictions in model ecosystems. Ecol. Model. 2003, 161(1-2):79-93. (Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0304380002002958).
8. Dexter N., et al. Predicting ecosystem wide impacts of wallaby management using a fuzzy cognitive map. Ecosystems 2012, 15(8):1363-1379. (Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10021-012-9590-7).
9. Dexter N., et al. Unintended consequences of invasive predator control in an Australian forest: overabundant wallabies and vegetation change. PLoS ONE 2013, 8(8):e69087. (Available at: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069087).
10. Donlan C.J., et al. Pleistocene Rewilding: an Optimistic Agenda for Twenty-First Century Conservation dx.doi.org. Available at:. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3873461?seq=1&show_all_authors_google=true&show_all_authors_jstor=true.
11. Elith J., et al. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 2006, 29(2):129-151. (Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x/full).
12. Estes J.A., et al. Trophic downgrading of planet Earth. Science 2011, 333(6040):301-306. (Available at: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/333/6040/301.full).
13. Fancourt B.A., et al. Devil declines and catastrophic cascades: is mesopredator release of feral cats inhibiting recovery of the eastern quoll. PLoS One 2015, 10(3):e0119303.
14. Finke D.L., Denno R.F. Predator diversity dampens trophic cascades. Nature 2004, 429(6990):407-410. (Available at: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v429/n6990/abs/nature02554.html).
15. Fleming P.J.S., Parker R.W. Temporal decline of 1080 within meat baits used for control of wild dogs in New South Wales. Wildl. Res. 1991, 18(6):729-740. (Available at: http://www.publish.csiro.au/view/journals/dsp_journal_fulltext.cfm?nid=144&f=WR9910729).
16. Foster C.N., Barton P.S., Lindenmayer D.B. Effects of Large Native Herbivores on Other Animals 2014, Journal of Applied Ecology, (Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2664.12268/abstract).
17. Gordon C.E., Feit A., Grüber J., Letnic M. Mesopredator suppression by an apex predator alleviates the risk of predation perceived by small prey. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2015, 282(1802):20142870.
18. Hollings T., Jones M., Mooney N., McCallum H. Trophic cascades following the disease-induced decline of an apex predator, the Tasmanian devil. Conserv. Biol. 2014, 28:63-75. pmid: 24024987. 10.1111/cobi.12152.
19. Hughes C., Gaffney R., Dickman C.R. A preliminary study assessing risk to Tasmanian devils from poisoning for red foxes. J. Wildl. Manag. 2011, 75(2):385-392. (Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.47/full).
20. Johnson C. Australia's Mammal Extinctions: a 50 000Year History 2006, Cambridge University Press.
21. Johnson C.N., VanDerWal J. Evidence that dingoes limit abundance of a mesopredator in eastern Australian forests. J. Appl. Ecol. 2009, 46(3):641-646. (Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01650.x/full).
22. Johnson C.N., Wroe S. Causes of extinction of vertebrates during the Holocene of mainland Australia: arrival of the dingo, or human impact?. The Holocene 2003, 13(6):941-948. (Available at: http://hol.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1191/0959683603hl682fa).
23. Jones M. Character displacement in Australian dasyurid carnivores: size relationships and prey size patterns. Ecology 1997, 78(8):2569-2587. (Available at: http://www.esajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[2569:CDIADC]2.0.CO;2).
24. Jones M., Barmuta L. Diet overlap and relative abundance of sympatric dasyurid carnivores: a hypothesis of competition 1998, 1-12. (Available at: message:<4B37AB316C0B174EBFFD88580967DFD31BF8F5E4@INFPWXM004.ad.unsw.edu).
25. Jones M., Barmuta L. Niche differentiation among sympatric Australian dasyurid carnivores 2000, 1-14. (Available at: message:<4B37AB316C0B174EBFFD88580967DFD31BF8F5E4@INFPWXM004.ad.unsw.edu.au).
26. Jones M., et al. Predators With Pouches: the Biology of Carnivorous Marsupials 2003, CSIRO Publishing.
27. Jones M.E., et al. Conservation management of Tasmanian devils in the context of an emerging, extinction-threatening disease: devil facial tumor disease. EcoHealth 2007, 4(3):326-337.
28. Kearney M.R., Wintle B.A., Porter W.P. Correlative and mechanistic models of species distribution provide congruent forecasts under climate change. Conserv. Lett. 2010, 3(3):203-213.
29. Keith D.A. Ocean Shores to Desert Dunes: the Native Vegetation of New South Wales and the ACT 2004, Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW).
30. Kinnear J.E., Onus M.L., Bromilow R.N. Fox control and rock-wallaby population dynamics. Wildl. Res. 1988, 15(4):435-450.
31. Kosko B. Fuzzy cognitive maps. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1986, 24.
32. Kovacs E.K.E.K., et al. Population and behavioural responses of native prey to alien predation. Oecologia 2012, 168(4):947-957. (Available at: http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=22042524&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks).
33. Letnic M., et al. Does a top predator suppress the abundance of an invasive mesopredator at a continental scale?. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2011, 20(2):343-353. (Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00600.x).
34. Letnic M., Ritchie E.G., Dickman C.R. Top predators as biodiversity regulators: the dingo Canis lupus dingo as a case study. Biol. Rev. 2012, 87(2):390-413. (Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00203.x/full).
35. Letnic M., Fillios M., Crowther M. The Arrival and Impacts of the Dingo. Carnivores of Australia: Past 2014, 55-69. ((Spriggs 2011). Available at: http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=jO0VBQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA53&dq=The+arrival+and+impacts+of+the+dingo&ots=X1bm27K_ne&sig=q82vdyz8GqOUkkVVcA1l4f0Mo2E [Accessed June 4, 2015]).
36. Marks C.A., Wilson R. Predicting mammalian target-specificity of the M-44 ejector in south-eastern Australia. Wildl. Res. 2005, 32(2):151-156. (Available at: http://www.publish.csiro.au/view/journals/dsp_journal_fulltext.cfm?nid=144&f=WR03102).
37. McCallum H., Jones M. To lose both would look like carelessness: Tasmanian devil facial tumour disease. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4(10):e342.
38. Mcilroy J.C. The sensitivity of Australian animals to 1080 poison. II. Marsupial and eutherian carnivores. Wildl. Res. 1981, 8(2):385-399. (Available at: http://www.publish.csiro.au/view/journals/dsp_journal_fulltext.cfm?nid=144&f=WR9810385).
39. Prugh L.R., Stoner C.J., Epps C.W., Bean W.T., Ripple W.J., Laliberte A.S., Brashares J.S. The rise of the mesopredator. Bioscience 2009, 59(9):779-791.
40. Ramsey D.S.L., Norbury G.L. Predicting the unexpected: using a qualitative model of a New Zealand dryland ecosystem to anticipate pest management outcomes. Aust. Ecol. 2009, 34:409-421.
41. Ramsey D., Veltman C. Predicting the effects of perturbations on ecological communities: what can qualitative models offer?. J. Anim. Ecol. 2005, 74(5):905-916. (Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00986.x).
42. Ripple W.J., et al. Status and ecological effects of the world's largest carnivores. Science 2014, 343(6167):1241484. (Available at: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/343/6167/1241484.full).
43. Ritchie E.G., et al. Ecosystem restoration with teeth: what role for predators?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012, 27(5):265-271. (Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.01.001).
44. Robertshaw J., Harden R. The ecology of the dingo in Northeastern New-South-Wales.4. Prey selection by dingoes, and its effect on the major prey species, the swamp wallaby, Wallabia-bicolor (Desmarest). Wildl. Res. 1986, 13(2):141.
45. Robley A., et al. Long-term and large-scale control of the introduced red fox increases native mammal occupancy in Australian forests. Biol. Conserv. 2014, 180:262-269. (Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S000632071400398X [Accessed November 3, 2014]).
46. Seddon P.J., et al. Reversing defaunation: restoring species in a changing world. Science 2014, 345(6195):406-412. (Available at: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi/10.1126/science.1251818 [Accessed July 24, 2014]).
47. Sinclair A.R.E., et al. Predicting effects of predation on conservation of endangered prey. Conserv. Biol. 1998, 12(3):564-575.
48. Soulé M.E., et al. Reconstructed dynamics of rapid extinctions of chaparral-requiring birds in urban habitat islands. Conserv. Biol. 1988, 2(1):75-92.
49. Soule M.E., et al. Ecological effectiveness: conservation goals for interactive species. Conserv. Biol. 2003, 17(5):1238-1250. (Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01599.x/full).