Combined use of lidar data and multispectral earth observation imagery for wetland habitat mapping

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

Volumn 37, Issue , 2015, Pages 56-64

  Rapinel, Sébastien ^a   Hubert Moya, Laurence ^a   Clémentb', Bernard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ RENNES 2   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

Author keywords

CORINE biotopes; Object based classification; Vegetation formations; Very high spatial resolution; Wetland function

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; HABITAT TYPE; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; LIDAR; MAPPING; MULTISPECTRAL IMAGE; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; WETLAND;

EID: 84938751712     PISSN: 15698432     EISSN: 1872826X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2014.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Alber, A., Piégay, H., 2011. Spatial disaggregation and aggregation procedures for characterizing fluvial features at the network-scale: application to the Rhône basin (France). Geomorphology 125,343-360.
2. Alexandridis, T.K., Lazaridou, E., Tsirika, A., Zalidis, G.C., 2009. Using Earth Observation to update a Natura 2000 habitat map for a wetland in Greece. J. Environ Manage. 90, 2243-2251.
3. Amiaud, B., Bouzillé, J.-B., Tournade, F., Bonis, A., 1998. Spatial patterns of soil salinities in old embanked marshlands in western France. Wetlands 18,482-494.
4. Axelsson, P., 1999. Processing of laser scanner data-algorithms and applications ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 54,138-147.
5. Baker, C, Lawrence, R., Montagne, C, Patten, D., 2006. Mapping wetlands and riparian areas using Landsat etm1 imagery and decision-tree-based models Wetlands 26, 465-474.
6. Bater, C.W., Coops, N.C., 2009. Evaluating error associated with LiDAR-derived DEM interpolation. Comput. Geosci. 35, 289-300.
7. Baudry, J., Burel, F., Aviron, S., Martin, M., Ouin, A., Pain, G., Thenail, C, 2003. Temporal variability of connectivity in agricultural landscapes: do farming activities help? Landscape Ecol. 18,303-314.
8. Blaschke, T., 2010. Object-based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J. Photogramm Remote Sens. 65, 2-16.
9. Boggs, G.S., 2010. Assessment of SPOT 5 and QuickBird remotely sensed imagery for mapping tree cover in savannas. Int. J. Appl. Earth Observ. Geoinform. 12, 217-224.
10. Bork, E.W., Su, J.G., 2007. Integrating LiDAR data and multispectral imagery for enhanced classification of rangeland vegetation: a meta-analysis. Remote Sens Environ. 111, 11-24.
11. Brinson, M., 2009. The United States HGM (Hydrogeomorphic) Approach. In: The Wetlands Handbook. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 486-512.
12. Chust, G., Galparsoro, I., Borja, Á., Franco, J., Uriarte, A., 2008. Coastal and estuarine habitat mapping, using LiDAR height and intensity and multispectral imagery Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Sci. 78,633-643.
13. Clément, B., Aidoud, A., Lebas, J.F., Nogues, E., 2011. Restauration de latourbière de Landemarais, vingt années de suivi. Sciences, Eaux & Territoires, 48-53.
14. Clément, B., Maltby, E., Hogan, D., McInnes, R., 1996. Relationships between vegetation, hydrology and properties in river marginal wetlands of the river Torridge basin. In: Hydrologie dans les pays celtiques. INRA, Paris, pp. 304-314.
15. Cowardin, L.M., Myers, V.I., 1974. Remote sensing for identification and classification of wetland vegetation. J. Wildl. Manage. 38,308-314.
16. Davies, C.E., Moss, D., Hill, M.O., 2004. European environment agency-European topic centre on nature protection and biodiversity. In: EUNIS Habitat Classification Revised 2004.
17. Davranche, A., Lefebvre, G., Poulin, B., 2010. Wetland monitoring using classification trees and SPOT-5 seasonal time series. Remote Sens. Environ. 114, 552-562.
18. Devillers, P., Devillers-Terschuren, J., Ledant, J., 1991. CORINE Biotopes Manual. Habitats of the European Community. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
19. Dissanska, M., Bernier, M., Payette, S., 2009. Object-based classification of very high resolution panchromatic images for evaluating recent change in the structure of patterned peatlands. Canadian J. Remote Sens. 35,189-215.
20. Dogan, O.K., Akyurek, Z., Beklioglu, M., 2009. Identification and mapping of submerged plants in a shallow lake using quickbird satellite data. J. Environ. Manage 90, 2138-2143.
21. Ecker, K., Waser, L.T., Küchler, M., 2010. Contribution of multi-source remote sensing data to predictive mapping of plant-indicator gradients within Swiss mire habitats Bot. Helv. 120, 29-42, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00035-010-0070-4.
22. Ellenberg, H., Weber, H.E., Dull, R., Wirth, V., 1991. Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. E. Goltze.
23. Feilhauer, H., Schmidtlein, S., 2011. On variable relations between vegetation patterns and canopy reflectance. Ecol. Inform. 6, 83-92.
24. Feilhauer, H., Thonfeld, F., Faude, U., He, K.S., Rocchini, D., Schmidtlein, S., 2013 Assessing floristic composition with multispectral sensors-a comparison based on monotemporal and multiseasonal field spectra. Int. J. Appl. Earth Observ Geoinform. 21, 218-229.
25. Friedl, M.A., Brodley, C.E., 1997. Decision tree classification of land cover from remotely sensed data. Remote Sens. Environ. 61,399-409.
26. Gilmore, M.S., Wilson, E.H., Barrett, N., Civco, D.L., Prisloe, S., Hurd, J.D., Chadwick, C, 2008. Integrating multi-temporal spectral and structural information to map wetland vegetation in a lower Connecticut River tidal marsh. Remote Sens. Environ 112, 4048-4060.
27. Goodwin, N.R., Coops, N.C., Culvenor, D.S., 2006. Assessment of forest structure with airborne LiDAR and the effects of platform altitude. Remote Sens. Environ. 103, 140-152.
28. Grootjans, A.P., Diggelen, R. van, Wassen, M.J., Wiersinga, W.A., 1988. The effects of drainage on groundwater quality and plant species distribution in stream valley meadows. Vegetatio 75,37-48.
29. Harris, A., Bryant, R.G., 2009. A multi-scale remote sensing approach for monitoring northern peatland hydrology: present possibilities and future challenges. J Environ. Manage. 90, 2178-2188.
30. Hay, G.J., Castilla, G., 2008. Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (GEOBIA): A new name for a new discipline. In: Object-Based Image Analysis, Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Berlin, pp. 75-89.
31. Hellesen, T., Matikainen, L, 2013. An object-based approach for mapping shrub and tree cover on grassland habitats by use of LiDAR and CIR orthoimages. Remote Sens. 5, 558-583.
32. Hopkinson, C, Chasmer, L.E., Sass, G., Creed, I.F., Sitar, M., Kalbfleisch, W., Treitz, P., 2005. Vegetation class dependent errors in LiDAR ground elevation and canopy height estimates in a boreal wetland environment. Canadian J. Remote Sens. 31, 191-206.
33. Johansen, K., Phinn, S., Witte, C, 2010. Mapping of riparian zone attributes using discrete return LiDAR, QuickBird and SPOT-5 imagery: assessing accuracy and costs. Remote Sens. Environ. 114, 2679-2691.
34. Ke, Y., Quackenbush, L.J., Im, J., 2010. Synergistic use of QuickBird multispectral imagery and LiDAR data for object-based forest species classification. Remote Sens. Environ. 114,1141-1154.
35. Laben, C.A., Brower, B.V., 2000. Process for enhancing the spatial resolution of multispectral imagery using pan-sharpening. U.S. Patent 6011875.
36. Laliberte, A., Koppa, J., Fredrickson, E., Rango, A., 2006. Comparison of nearest neighbor and rule-based decision tree classification in an object-oriented Environment. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IEEE International Conference, Denver, pp. 3923-3926.
37. Lanoé, E., 2008. Diagnostics phyto-écologiques et paysager des marais de la basse vallée du Couesnon et de leur rôle fonctionnel potentiel en terme d'accueil de l'avifaune. In: MasterThesis. Université Rennes1.
38. Maltby, E., 2009. Functional Assessment of Wetlands: Toward Evaluation of Ecosystem Services. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge.
39. Maltby, E., Barker, T., 2009. The Wetlands Handbook. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.
40. Mitsch, W.J., Gosselink, J.G., 2007. Wetlands, 4th ed. Wiley, Oxford.
41. Mountrakis, G., Im, J., Ogole, C, 2011. Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 66, 247-259, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.11.001.
42. Ozesmi, S.L., Bauer, M.E., 2002. Satellite remote sensing of wetlands. Wetlands Ecol Manage. 10,381-402.
43. Rapinel, S., 2012. Contribution de la télédétection à l'évaluation des fonctions des zones humides: de l'observation à la modélisation prospective. In: Ph. D. Thesis Université Rennes 2.
44. Rapinel, S., Hubert-Moy, L, Clément, B., Nabucet, J., Cudennec, C, 2013. Ditches' network extraction and hydrogeomorphological characterization using LiDARderived DTM in wetlands. Hydrol. Res., http://dx.doi.org/10.216/nh.2013.121.
45. Reitberger, J., Schnörr, C, Krzystek, P., Stilla, U., 2009. 3D segmentation of single trees exploiting full waveform LiDAR data. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens 64, 561-574.
46. Rosso, P.H., Ustin, S.L., Hastings, A., 2006. Use of LiDAR to study changes associated with Spartina invasion in San Francisco Bay marshes. Remote Sens. Environ. 100, 295-306.
47. Sanchez-Hernandez, C, Boyd, D.S., Foody, G.M., 2007. Mapping specific habitats from remotely sensed imagery: support vector machine and support vector data description-based classification of coastal saltmarsh habitats. Ecol. Inform. 2, 83-88.
48. Schmidtlein, S., Zimmermann, P., Schüpferling, R., Weiß, C, 2007. Mapping the floristic continuum: ordination space position estimated from imaging spectroscopy J. Veg. Sci. 18, 131-140.
49. Shuman, C.S., Ambrose, R.F., 2003. A comparison of remote sensing and groundbased methods for monitoring wetland restoration success. Restor. Ecol. 11, 325-333.
50. Smeeckaert, J., Mallet, C, David, N., Chehata, N., Ferraz, A., 2013. Large-scale classification of water areas using airborne topographic LiDAR data. Remote Sens Environ. 138, 134-148.
51. Sofia, G., Fontana, G.D., Tarolli, P., 2014. High-resolution topography and anthropogenic feature extraction: testinggeomorphometric parameters in floodplains Hydrol. Processes 28, 4, 2046-2061.
52. Xie, Y., Sha, Z., Yu, M., 2008. Remote sensing imagery in vegetation mapping: a review. J. Plant Ecol. 1,9-23, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtm005.