Knowledge, understanding, and uptake of noninvasive prenatal testing among Latina women

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 748-753

  Farrell, Rachel ^a,c   Hawkins, Anne ^a,b,d   Barragan, Deborah ^b,e   Hudgins, Louanne ^a,b   Taylor, Joanne ^a,b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; COMPREHENSION; EMPLOYMENT STATUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; KNOWLEDGE; LANGUAGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; NONINVASIVE PRENATAL TESTING; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRENATAL SCREENING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CALIFORNIA; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ETHNOLOGY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HISPANIC; MATERNAL SERUM SCREENING TEST; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PREGNANCY; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UTILIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CALIFORNIA; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HISPANIC AMERICANS; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; LANGUAGE; LINEAR MODELS; MATERNAL SERUM SCREENING TESTS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PREGNANCY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84938744806     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: 10970223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.4599     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Lo Y, Corbetta N, Chamberlain P, et al. Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum. Lancet 1997;350:485-7.
2. Chiu RW, Chan KC, Gao Y, et al. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy by massively parallel genomic sequencing of DNA in maternal plasma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105(51):20458-63.
3. Fan CH, Gu W, Wang J, et al. Non-invasive prenatal measurement of the fetal genome. Nature 2012;487:320-6.
4. Fan C, Quake S. Sensitivity of noninvasive prenatal detection of fetal aneuploidy from maternal plasma using shotgun sequencing is limited only by counting statistics. PLoS One 2010;5(5):e10439.
5. Ashoor G, Argyro Syngelaki RM, Wagner M, et al. Chromosome-selective sequencing of maternal plasma cell-free DNA for first-trimester detection of trisomy 21 and trisomy 18. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206(322):e1-5.
6. Bianchi D, Platt L, Goldberg J, et al. Genome-wide fetal aneuploidy detection by maternal plasma DNA sequencing. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119(5):1-13.
7. Palomaki G, Deciu C, Kloza E, et al. DNA sequencing of maternal plasma reliably identifies trisomy 18 and trisomy 13 as well as Down syndrome: an international collaborative study. Genet Med 2012;14(3):296-305.
8. Sparks A, Struble C, Wang E, et al. Noninvasive prenatal detection and selective analysis of cell-free DNA obtained from maternal blood: evaluation for trisomy 21 and trisomy 18. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206(4):319-27.
9. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion: noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120(6):1532-4.
10. Devers P, Cronister A, Ormond KE, et al. Noninvasive prenatal testing/noninvasive prenatal diagnosis: the position of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns 2013;22(3):291-5; Epub 2013 Jan 22.
11. Gregg AR, Gross SJ, Best RG, et al. ACMG statement on noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy. Genet Med 2013;15(5):395-8; Epub 2013 Apr 4.
12. Griffiths C, Kupperman M. Perceptions of prenatal testing for birth defects among rural Latinas. Matern Child Health J 2008;12:34-42.
13. Press N, Browner C. Characteristics of women who refuse an offer of prenatal diagnosis: data from the California maternal serum alpha fetoprotein blood test experience. Am J Med Genet 1998;78:433-45.
14. Baker D, Teklehaimanot S, Hassan R, et al. A look at a Hispanic and African American population in an urban prenatal diagnostic center: referral reasons, amniocentesis acceptance, and abnormalities detected. Genet Med 2004;6(4):211-8.
15. State of California, Department of Public Health, Birth Records. 2011. Retrieved from http://www.cdph.ca.gov/data/statistics/Pages/StatewideBirthStatiscalDataTables.aspx.
16. U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the United States. 2012. Retrieved from: http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0080.pdf.
17. Marteau T, Dormandy E. Facilitating informed choice in prenatal testing: how well are we doing? Am J Med Genet 2001;106:185-90.
18. Allyse L, Sayres LC, Goodspeed TA, et al. Attitudes towards non invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy among US adults of reproductive age. J Perinatol 2014;34:429-34.
19. Tischler R, Hudgins L, Blumenfeld YJ, et al. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis: pregnant women's interest and expected uptake. Prenat Diagn 2011;31:1292-9.
20. Chetty S, Garabedian MJ, Norton ME. Uptake of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in women following positive aneuploidy screening. Prenat Diagn 2013;33:542-6.