Quantum chemistry structures and properties of 134 kilo molecules

Scientific Data

Volumn 1, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Ramakrishnan, Raghunathan ^a   Dral, Pavlo O ^b,c   Rupp, Matthias ^a   Von Lilienfeld, O Anatole ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR KOHLENFORSCHUNG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^d ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOLECULAR LIBRARY; ORGANIC COMPOUND;

CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; FACTUAL DATABASE; MOLECULAR LIBRARY; THERMODYNAMICS;

DATABASES, FACTUAL; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; ORGANIC CHEMICALS; SMALL MOLECULE LIBRARIES; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84938679411     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20524463     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2014.22     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Curtarolo, S. et al. The high-throughput highway to computational materials design. Nature Mater 12, 191-201 (2013).
2. Kirkpatrick, P. & Ellis, C. Chemical space. Nature 432, 823 (2004).
3. Koch, W. & Holthausen, M. C. A Chemist's Guide to Density Functional Theory (Wiley, 2002).
4. National institute of standards and technology. http://srdata.nist.gov (accessed 31 March 2014).
5. Jurečka, P., Šponer, J., Cerný, J. & Hobza, P. Benchmark database of accurate (MP2 and CCSD(T) complete basis set limit) interaction energies of small model complexes, DNA base pairs, and amino acid pairs. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8, 1985-1993 (2006).
6. Řezáč, J., Riley, K. E. & Hobza, P. S66: a well-balanced database of benchmark interaction energies relevant to biomolecular structures. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7, 2427-2438 (2011).
7. Lynch, B. J. & Truhlar, D. G. Small representative benchmarks for thermochemical calculations. J. Phys. Chem. A 107, 8996-8999 (2003).
8. Fink, T., Bruggesser, H. & Reymond, J.-L. Virtual exploration of the small-molecule chemical universe below 160 daltons. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 1504-1508 (2005).
9. Martin, K. & Grimme, S. Mindless DFT benchmarking. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 5, 993-1003 (2009).
10. Virshup, A. M., Contreras-García, J., Wipf, P., Yang, W. & Beratan, D. N. Stochastic voyages into uncharted chemical space produce a representative library of all possible drug-like compounds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 19, 7296-7303 (2013).
11. Ruddigkeit, L., van Deursen, R., Blum, L. C. & Reymond, J.-L. Enumeration of 166 billion organic small molecules in the chemical universe database GDB-17. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52, 2864-2875 (2012).
12. Curtiss, L. A., Redfern, P. C. & Raghavachari, K. Gaussian-4 theory using reduced order perturbation theory. J. Chem. Phys. 127, 124105 (2007).
13. Rupp, M., Tkatchenko, A., Müller, K.-R. & von Lilienfeld, O. A. Fast and accurate modeling of molecular atomization energies with machine learning. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 058301 (2012).
14. Hachmann, J. et al. The harvard clean energy project: large-scale computational screening and design of organic photovoltaics on the world community grid. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2, 2241-2251 (2011).
15. Norskov, J. K., Bligaard, T., Rossmeisl, J. & Christensen, C. H. Towards the computational design of solid catalysts. Nature Chem. 1, 37-46 (2009).
16. Weininger, D. SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1.Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci. 28, 31-36 (1988).
17. Sadowski, J. & Gasteiger, J. From atoms and bonds to 3-dimensional atomic coordinates-automatic model builders. Chem. Rev. 93, 2567-2581 (1993).
18. Stewart, J. J. P. MOPAC2012, Version 13.136L, Stewart Computational Chemistry (Colorado Springs, 2012).
19. Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 09, Revision d.01 (Gaussian, Inc., 2009).
20. Heller, S. R. & McNaught, A. D. The IUPAC international chemical identifier (InChI). Chemistry International 31, 7-9 (2009).
21. O'Boyle, N. M. et al. Open Babel: an open chemical toolbox. J. Chem. Inf. 3, 33 (2011).
22. Wodrich, M. D., Corminboeuf, C., Schreiner, P. R., Fokin, A. A. & Schleyer, P. v. R. How accurate are DFT treatments of organic energies? Org. Lett. 9, 1851-1854 (2007).
23. Curtiss, L. A., Redfern, P. C. & Raghavachari, K. Gaussian-4 theory. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 084108 (2007).
24. Montgomery, J. A. Jr, Frisch, M. J., Ochterski, J. W. & Petersson, G. A. A complete basis set model chemistry. VI. use of density functional geometries and frequencies. J. Chem. Phys. 110, 2282-2827 (1999).
25. Montgomery, J. A. Jr, Frisch, M. J., Ochterski, J. W. & Petersson, G. A. A complete basis set model chemistry. VII. use of the minimum population localization method. J. Chem. Phys. 112, 6532-6542 (2000).
26. Curtiss, L. A., Redfern, P. C., Raghavachari, K. & Pople, J. A. Gaussian-3X (G3X) theory: use of improved geometries, zero-point energies, and Hartree-Fock basis sets. J. Chem. Phys. 114, 108-117 (2001).
27. Curtiss, L. A., Redfern, P. C. & Raghavachari, K. Assessment of Gaussian-3 and density-functional theories on the G3/05 test set of experimental energies. J. Chem. Phys. 123, 124107 (2005).
28. Chan, B. & Radom, L. BDE261: a comprehensive set of high-level theoretical bond dissociation enthalpies. J. Phys. Chem. A 116, 4975-4986 (2012).
29. Boese, A. D. et al. W3 theory: robust computational thermochemistry in the kJ/mol accuracy range. J. Chem. Phys. 120, 4129-4141 (2004).