Poly(ester-urethane) scaffolds: Effect of structure on properties and osteogenic activity of stem cells

Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Volumn 9, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 930-942

  Kiziltay, Aysel ^a   Marcos Fernandez, Angel ^b   San Roman, Julio ^b   Sousa, Rui A ^c   Reis, Rui L ^c   Hasirci, Vasif ^a   Hasirci, Nesrin ^a  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b INSTITUTO DE CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGÍA DE POLÍMEROS   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Bone marrow stem cells; Osteogenic activity; Poly(ester urethane); Porosity; Scaffold; Stiffness

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; BONE; CELL CULTURE; CELL ENGINEERING; CELL PROLIFERATION; COMPRESSION TESTING; DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING CALORIMETRY; ESTERS; PORE SIZE; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STEM CELLS; STIFFNESS MATRIX; THERMOGRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS;

BONE MARROW STEM CELLS; MERCURY POROSIMETRY; OSTEOGENIC ACTIVITY; POLY(ESTER URETHANES); POLY(ESTER-URETHANE); POLYESTERURETHANES; PROPERTY; SALT LEACHING; STEM-CELL; STRUCTURE DESIGN;

STIFFNESS;

CALCIUM; LYSINE; POLY(ESTER URETHANE); POLYMER; SODIUM CHLORIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; BOVINE SERUM ALBUMIN; INORGANIC SALT; MERCURY; POLYESTER; POLYURETHAN;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE MINERALIZATION; BONE TISSUE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL VIABILITY; COMPRESSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEGRADATION; DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING CALORIMETRY; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; LEACHING; MALE; MATRIX STIFFNESS; MEASUREMENT; MECHANICAL STIMULATION; MELTING POINT; MERCURY POROSIMETRY; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PORE SIZE; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DESIGN; RAT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STEM CELL CULTURE; THERMOGRAVIMETRY; THERMOSTABILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL SCAFFOLD; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; ANIMAL; BONE; BONE MARROW CELL; BOVINE; CHEMISTRY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECTS; MECHANICAL STRESS; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; STEM CELL;

ANIMALS; BONE AND BONES; BONE MARROW CELLS; CALORIMETRY, DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING; CATTLE; CELL PROLIFERATION; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; LYSINE; MALE; MERCURY; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OSTEOGENESIS; POLYESTERS; POLYURETHANES; POROSITY; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SALTS; SERUM ALBUMIN, BOVINE; STEM CELLS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; THERMOGRAVIMETRY; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84938601638     PISSN: 19326254     EISSN: 19327005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/term.1848     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aksoy EA, Motta A, Fedel M et al. 2008; Plasma protein adsorption and platelet adhesion on heparin-immobilized polyurethane films. J Bioact Compat Pol 23: 505-519.
2. Basu B, Katti D, Kumar A. 2009; Advanced Biomaterials: Fundamentals, Processing, and Applications. Wiley: New Jersey, NJ, USA.
3. Bennett BT. 1994; Regulation and requirements. In Essentials for Animal Research: A Primer for Research Personnel, 2nd edn, Bennett BT, Brown MJ, Schofield JC (eds). National Agricultural Library: Beltsville, MD; 1-9.
4. Burke A, Hasirci N. 2004; Polyurethanes in biomedical applications. In Biomaterials: From Molecules to Engineered Tissues, Hasirci N, Hasirci V. (eds). Kluwer Academic/Plenum: New York.
5. Calil M, Gaboardi F, Bardi M et al. 2007; Enzymatic degradation of poly(ε-caprolactone) and cellulose acetate blends by lipase and α-amylase. Polym Test 26(2): 257-261.
6. Chan BP, Leong KW. 2008; Scaffolding in tissue engineering: general approaches and tissue-specific considerations. Eur Spine J 17(4): 467-479.
7. Diba M, Fathi MH, Kharaziha M. 2011; Novel forsterite/polycaprolactone nanocomposite scaffold for tissue engineering applications. Mater Lett 65(12): 1931-1934.
8. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL. 2005; Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310: 1139-1143.
9. Engler A, Bacakova L, Newman C et al. 2004; Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. Biophys J 86(1): 617-628.
10. Flanagan LA, Ju YE, Marg B et al. 2002; Neurite branching on deformable substrates. NeuroReport 13(18): 2411-2415.
11. Gan Z, Yu D, Zhong Z et al. 1999; Enzymatic degradation of poly(ε-caprolactone)/poly(dl-lactide) blends in phosphate buffer solution. Polymer 40(10): 2859-2862.
12. Harley BA, Leung JH, Silva EC et al. 2007; Mechanical characterization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. Acta Biomater 3(4): 463-474.
13. Hasirci N, Aksoy EA. 2007; Synthesis and modifications of polyurethanes for biomedical purposes. High Perform Polym 19: 621-637.
14. Hasirci N. 1991; Polyurethanes. In High Performance Biomaterials: Comprehensive Guide to Medical and Pharmaceutical Application, Szycher M (ed.). Technomic Publishing: Lancaster, UK.
15. Hasirci V, Tezcaner A, Hasirci N et al. 2003; Oxygen plasma modification of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) film surfaces for tissue engineering purposes. J Appl Polym Sci 87: 1285-1289.
16. Hench LL. 1991; Bioceramics: from concept to clinic. J Am Ceram Soc 74: 1487-1510.
17. Hing KA. 2005; Bioceramic bone graft substitutes: influence of porosity and chemistry. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 199: 184-199.
18. Hollis JM, Flahiff CM. 1995; Factors affecting bone ingrowth. Encyclop Handb Biomater Bioeng 1: 799-821.
19. Hong SG, Lin YC, Lin CH. 2008; Crystallization and degradation behaviors of treated polyhydroxybutyrates. React Funct Polym 68: 1516-1523.
20. Joshi VS, Lei NY, Walthers CM, Wu B, Dunn JCY. 2013; Macroporosity enhances vascularization of electrospun scaffolds. J Surg Res 183: 18-26.
21. Kasper FK, Liao J, Kretlow JD et al. 2008; Flow perfusion culture of mesenchymal stem cells for bone tissue engineering. In Stem Book. Stem Cell Research Community: StemBook, doi/10.3824/stembook.1.18.1: http://www.stembook.org
22. Kayirhan N, Denizli A, Hasirci N. 2001; Adsorption of blood proteins on glow-discharge modified polyurethane membranes. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 1322-1332.
23. Keogh MB, O'Brien FJ, Daly JS. 2010; Substrate stiffness and contractile behaviour modulate the functional maturation of osteoblasts on a collagen-GAG scaffold. Acta Biomater 6: 4305-4313.
24. Kim K, Yeatts A, Dean D et al. 2010; Stereolithographic bone scaffold design parameters: osteogenic differentiation and signal expression. Tissue Eng B Rev 16: 523-539.
25. Kiziltay A, Fernandez AM, San Roman J et al. 2012; Lysine based poly(ester-urethane) films for tissue engineering applications. J Biomater Tissue Eng 2: 1-10.
26. Kutay S, Tincer T, Hasirci N. 1990; Polyurethanes as biomedical materials. Br Polym J 23: 267-272.
27. Lacroix J, Jallot E, Nedelec JM, Lao J. 2013; Influence of glass scaffolds macroporosity on the bioactive process. J Phys Chem B 117: 510-517.
28. Lien SM, Ko LY, Huang TJ. 2010; Effect of crosslinking temperature on compression strength of gelatin scaffold for articular cartilage tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng 30: 631-635.
29. Mistry MA, Mikos AG. 2005; Tissue engineering strategies for bone regeneration. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 94: 1-22.
30. Mandal BB, Gil ES, Panilaitis B et al. 2013; Laminar silk scaffolds for aligned tissue fabrication. Macromol Biosci 13(1): 48-58.
31. Mandal BB, Kundu SC. 2009; Cell proliferation and migration in silk fibroin 3D scaffolds. Biomaterials 30: 2956-2965.
32. Marcos-Fernández A, Abraham GA, Valentín JL et al. 2006; Synthesis and characterization of biodegradable non-toxic poly(ester-urethane-urea)s based on poly(ε-caprolactone) and amino acid derivatives. Polymer 47(3): 785-798.
33. Mitsak AG, Kemppainen JM, Harris MT. 2011; Effect of polycaprolactone scaffold permeability on bone regeneration in vivo. Tissue Eng A 17: 1831-1839.
34. Nelson CE, Gupta MK, Adolph EJ et al. 2012; Sustained local delivery of siRNA from an injectable scaffold. Biomaterials 33: 1154-1161.
35. Ozdemir Y, Serbetci K, Hasirci N. 2002; Oxygen plasma modification of polyurethane membranes. J Mater Sci Mater Meth 13: 1147-1152.
36. Pek YS, Wan ACA, Ying JY. 2010; The effect of matrix stiffness on mesenchymal stem cell differentiation in a 3D thixotropic gel. Biomaterials 31: 385-391.
37. Pelham RJ, Wang YL. 1997; Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Cell Biol 94: 13661-13665.
38. Rada T, Santos TC, Marques AP et al. 2012; Osteogenic differentiation of two distinct subpopulations of human adipose-derived stem cells: an in vitro and in vivo study. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 6: 1-11.
39. Sharaf B, Faris CB, Abukawa H et al. 2012; Three-dimensionally printed polycaprolactone and β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: an in vitro study. J Oral Maxil Surg 70: 647-656.
40. Standard guide for assessing microstructure of polymeric scaffolds for use in tissue engineered medical products. 2010 ASTM F2450-10.
41. Trécant M, Delécrin J, Royer J. 1994; Mechanical changes in macro-porous calcium phosphate ceramics after implantation in bone. Clin Mater 15: 233-240.
42. Ulubayram K, Hasirci N. 1992; Polyurethanes: effect of chemical composition on mechanical properties and oxygen permeability. Polymer 33: 2084-2088.
43. van Griensven M, Diederichs S, Kasper C. 2005; Mechanical strain of bone marrow stromal cells induces proliferation and differentiation into osteoblast-like cells. In Topics in Tissue Engineering, Ashammakhi NA, Reis RL (eds). http://www.oulu.fi/spareparts/ebook_topics_in_t_e_vol2/abstracts/griensven_0102.pdf.
44. Wagoner J, Harley A, Brendan AC. 2011; Mechanobiology of Cell-Cell and Cell-Matrix Interactions. Springer: New York.
45. Yilgor P, Sousa R, Reis RL et al. 2008; 3D plotted PCL scaffolds for stem cell based bone tissue engineering. Macromol Symp 269: 92-99.
46. Yilgor P, Sousa RA, Reis RL et al. 2010; Effect of scaffold architecture and BMP2 BMP7 delivery on in vitro bone regeneration. J Mater Sci Mater Meth 21(11): 2999-3008.
47. Zhang J, Zhang H, Wu L et al. 2006; Fabrication of three-dimensional polymeric scaffolds. J Mater Sci 1: 1725-1731.