Perceived accuracy in continuous glucose monitoring: Understanding the impact on patients

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 339-341

  Polonsky, William H ^a,b   Hessler, Danielle ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Behavioral Diabetes Institute   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Continuous glucose monitoring; Patient satisfaction; Trust

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE;

ALGORITHM; BLOOD GLUCOSE METER; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HUMAN; HYPOGLYCEMIA; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERSONAL VALUE; QUALITY OF LIFE; REAL TIME CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING; REVIEW; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DIABETES MELLITUS; PSYCHOLOGY;

BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; DIABETES MELLITUS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS;

EID: 84938590340     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1932296814559302     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Holden RJ, Karsh BT. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Info. 2010;43: 159-172.
2. Shaw SGG, Barnett J, Kuljis J, Hone K, Kaczmarski R. Factors determining patients' intentions to use point-of-care testing medical devices for self-monitoring: the case of international normalized ratio self-testing. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013;7:1-14.
3. Diabetes Mine. DexCom DM consumer data manager, September 11, 2006, reader responses. Available at: http://www.diabetesmine.com/2006/09/dexcom-dm-consu. html#comment-22374224. Accessed September 28, 2014.
4. Ramchandani N, Arya S, Ten S, Bhandari S. Real-life utilization of real-time continuous glucose monitoring: the complete picture. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5:860-870.
5. Chamberlain J, Dopita D, Gilgen E. Persistence of continuous glucose monitoring use in a community setting 1 year after purchase. Clin Diabetes. 2013;31:106-109.
6. Polonsky WH, Hessler D. What are the quality of life-related benefits and losses associated with real-time continuous glucose monitoring? A survey of current users. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013;15:295-301.
7. Hessler D, Polonsky WH, Bowman, F, Price D. The subjective experience of CGM-RT use: comparing current user with exusers. Diabetes. 2012;61(suppl 1):A215.
8. Pickup JC, Freeman SC, Sutton AJ. Glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes during real time continuous glucose monitoring compared with self monitoring of blood glucose: meta-Analysis of randomised controlled trials using individual patient data. BMJ. 2011;343:d3805.
9. Shivers JP, Mackowiak L, Anhalt H, Zisser H. "Turn it off!" Diabetes device alarm fatigue considerations for the present and the future. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7:789-794.
10. Roberts R, Walsh J, Heinemann L. Help! Someone is beeping. . . . J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014;8:627-629.
11. Tansey M, Laffel L, Cheng J, et al. Satisfaction with continuous glucose monitoring in adults and youths with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2011;28:1118-1122.
12. Joubert M, Reznik Y. Personal continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in diabetes management: review of the literature and implementation for practical use. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;96:294-305
13. Edelman S, Pettus J, Price, D. How current continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) users translate CGM data into diabetes management: results of a survey. Diabetologia. 2014;57(suppl 1):1020.
14. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group. Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1464-1476.
15. Weinzimer S, Xing D, Tansey M, et al. FreeStyle Navigator continuous glucose monitoring system use in children with type 1 diabetes using glargine-based multiple daily dose regimens. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:525-527.
16. Jenkins AJ, Krishnamurthy B, Best JD, et al. An algorithm guiding patient responses to real-time continuous glucose monitoring improves quality of life. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13:105-109.
17. Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Hessler D, Edelman SV. What is so tough about self-monitoring of blood glucose? Perceived obstacles among patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2014;31:40-46.
18. Polonsky WH, Fisher L. Right answer, but wrong question: self-monitoring of blood glucose can be clinically valuable for noninsulin users. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:179-182.
19. Matuleviciene V, Joseph J, Andelin M, et al. A clinical trial of the accuracy and treatment experience of the Dexcom G4 sensor (Dexcom G4 system) and Enlite sensor (Guardian real-time system) tested simultaneously in ambulatory patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014;16:759-767.
20. Langendam M, Luijf YM, Hooft L, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring systems for type 1 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Library. 2012;18:1-134.