Advancing the rigour and integrity of our science: The registered reports initiative

Stress and Health

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 177-179

  Probst, Tahira M ^a   Hagger, Martin S ^b  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTHOR; DATA ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; EDITORIAL; HEALTH; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; REGISTERED REPORT; REGISTERED REPORTS INITIATIVE; REVIEW; STRESS; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; PROCEDURES; RESEARCH; STANDARDS;

HUMANS; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; PEER REVIEW; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH REPORT;

EID: 84938589132     PISSN: 15323005     EISSN: 15322998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/smi.2645     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Brembs, B., Button, K., &, Munafò, M., (2013). Deep impact: Unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291.
2. Chambers, C. D., (2013). Registered Reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49 (3), 609-610.
3. Chambers, C. D., Feredoes, E., Muthukumaraswamy, S. D., &, Etchells, P., (2014). Instead of 'playing the game' it is time to change the rules: Registered Reports at AIMS neuroscience and beyond. AIMS Neuroscience, 1 (1), 4-17.
4. Editorial (2005). The cost of salami slicing. Nature Materials, 4, 1. DOI: 10.1038/nmat1305.
5. Harzing, A.W., (2007) Publish or Perish, available from http://www.harzing.com/pop.htm
6. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., &, Jennions, M. D., (2015). The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science. PLoS Biology, 13 e1002106. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106.
7. Landis, R. S., Cortina, J. M., &, Rogelberg, S. G., (2014). Journal of Business and Psychology. http://www.springer.com/cda/content/document/cda-downloaddocument/JBP+RR+Special+Issue+May+5RL.pdf?SGWID=0-0-45-1458040-p35536793
8. Special trial initiative announcement: Provisional acceptance based on a peer-reviewed proposal: An alternative publication model in the search for scientific truth. Retrieved from http://www.springer.com/cda/content/document/cda-downloaddocument/JBP+RR+Special+Issue+May+5RL.pdf?SGWID=0-0-45-1458040-p35536793
9. Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., &, Motyl, M., (2012). Scientific utopia II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7 (6), 615-631.
10. Simons, D. J., Holcombe, A. O., &, Spellman, B. A., (2014). An introduction to registered replication reports at Perspectives on Psychological Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 552-555. DOI: 10.1177/1745691614543974.
11. Westreich, D., (2015). Editorial: A lasting impact. American Journal of Epidemiology, 181 (11), 829-831.